User talk:Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Explain[edit]

"There's always a place in me you can call home" seems to be your motto. Can you please explain what this means?? Lostfan333 (talk) 22:36, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

it's a song Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 22:45, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to John McAfee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missed a word?[edit]

Can you check you edit to the talk page 'Reverse racism', you may have missed a 'not' if I read you right. I write this in good faith sorry if i miss understood. You can delete this afterwards either way Dushan Jugum (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edit was now reverted due to not being sourced, I will find the sources (as most of these ideas are commonly discussed and I will add it back in with the typo removed Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 00:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No no, not that, you said on the talk page that Reverse racism is real. But the context of your sentence implies you meant that you think it is not. I don't have a dog in the fight, just letting you know. "I believe that it is real, but it's still a contentious topic, so it needs an article, unfortunately". Dushan Jugum (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I ever said or implied that it wasn't real then I apoligise, I absolutely do think it is real, but my article (although not sourced) was meant to be as unbiased as possible in writing an overview of what the concept of anti-white racism is, The article currently is slightly biased towards saying that it isn't since it says "scholars" believe reverse racism isn't real, and at the beginning launches into saying that people believe affirmative action is racist, when the concept of anti white racism applies to many other things, (basically anything), the fact they decided to start the article off with that was probably done to misrepresent the concept of anti white racism to just be about people who don't like affirmative action programs and not literally anything that's racially prejudiced against white people, it makes no sense to start a wikipedia article about such a broad concept and immediately focus the article around specific programs, when i find the sources I will write down the concept of reverse racism and the debate surrounding it in as much of an unbiased way as i can, without letting my own views come into it, the problem is those at wikipedia love to slant things in their direction Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 00:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Completely my mistake. Dushan Jugum (talk) 00:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2032 United States presidential election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 22:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok it didn't really need to be made i just was bored lol Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 22:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2032 United States presidential election, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2032 United States presidential election and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:2032 United States presidential election during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been previously warned about disruptive editing and vandalism, and looking through your recent edits, I see obvious vandalism on the 11th, what appears to be vandalism on September 26th, and finally there are your unexplained recent trolling edits to Éric Zemmour. Given your previous history of vandalism and disruptive editing, which you have been blocked for previously, I am blocking you indefinitely. You will need to make a commitment to stop your problematic editing if you want to appeal this block. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to explain things about my edit to that page (which wasn't a troll) but you literally have pronouns in your bio, so your opinion will have to be discarded, i have nothing more to say Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 23:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that's relevant. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 23:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong: I'm glad you're not going to waste our time with a bullshit "explanation" - with an opinion like that, you're not welcome here. Don't come back ✨ ~TNT (she/her • talk) 23:26, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
i'm not expecting to be allowed back, especially after speaking like that to an admin, but if it's my "opinion" that plays any part in me being unbanned, you can say goodbye to being able to call yourselves an "unbiased" site Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 23:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If not allowing bigotry is "biased", then sign me up! Now, off you fuck ~TNT (she/her • talk) 23:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, pronoun user "There's always a place in me that you can call home" ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
11:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Block endorsed. I was pretty close to doing the same thing. (And gave them their first block.) Talk page access will be revoked if there are any more unconstructive comments. Either come up with a unblock rationale or stop responding. Sergecross73 msg me 23:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have nothing more to say, you may do that. Justknowthatyourenotinthisthingalong (talk) 23:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Talk page access revoked. Sergecross73 msg me 23:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]