User talk:Justanotherescapee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Dubstep ballet for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dubstep ballet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubstep ballet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey Review me! 18:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Vesey,

Please tell me when the final deletion decision will be made? Is there anything more I can do to assist in this process, and keep the (valid) entry? I think this 'dubstep ballet' entry is a very important article for Wikipedia.

On behalf of all the LUMESians and all the dubstep ballet folks, many thanks.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:58, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

The basic Wikipedia rule is that something has to exist in reliable sources (not necessarily online--could be in books instead etc.) before it can have an article. See WP:GNG and WP:RS for the basic policies, and WP:SCRABBLE for a good example of how this plays out. This rule is in place so that people can't just write whatever they want, and ensures that Wikipedia contains factual information - by saying everything has to be sourced to a reliable source, we have a degree of quality control.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Justanotherescapee. You have new messages at I Jethrobot's talk page.
Message added 10:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 10:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]