User talk:Jstaniek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome from Redwolf24[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We as a community are glad to have you and thank you for creating a user account! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get orphans.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome.

Redwolf24 The current date and time is 24 May 2024 T 18:56 UTC.

P.S. I like messages :-P

File:Kexi logo.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kexi logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:00, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kugar[edit]

Dear Jaroslaw. As main developer of Kexi you know that Kexi’s report tool (introduced in Kexi 2.2) is meant to replace Kugar. I don’t understand why you make such a fuss about this topic. It’s not like I wrote about Kugar in Calligra’s article in great detail (doing so would be indeed wrong). It’s just a small link and the link happens to be in Calligra’s components list under Kexi because Kexi is no longer in the component list of KOffice (you moved Kexi out of KOffice in 2010, remember?). Kugar has its own article for details.

As for database management or creator: Kexi markets itself as MS Access for Linux. The Access article says: “Microsoft Access, also known as Microsoft Office Access, is a database management system from Microsoft”. So, when Kexi is Access for Linux and Access is a database management system, why isn’t Kexi a database management system? Here’s a quote from that one’s article: “A database management system (DBMS) is a software package with computer programs that controls the creation, maintenance, and use of a database.” Doesn’t Kexi do just that? --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • I agree with you that the Access file format wording is irritating. I'll fix is during this weekend.
  • To explain the mentioning of Kugar further: In the table every Calligra component that supersedes a KOffice component has an entry what it supersedes (Sheets was KSpread and so on). Thinking even further, my mistake was not to mention Kugar but instead not to list Words as replacement for KWord.
  • As for what Kexi is: I have to confess that my knowledge about databases is too limited. I copied the table from OpemOffice’s or LibreOffice’s article (incl. the DBMS part from OO/LO Base). From a Wikipedia point of view however, it'll be handy to link to an overview article. Would “Visual DBMS and RAD tool” (or something along these lines) with links to appropriate articles OK? --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 02:31, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Any chance you can get your hands on recent Calligra Active screenshots? --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 02:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jstaniek. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jstaniek. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jstaniek. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]