This is an archive of past discussions with Joshua Issac. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thoran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
ACC thanks you
The Account Creation Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Joshua Issac, for going above and beyond the call of volunteering. Joshua Issac was instrumental in clearing the ACC backlog and handling over 100 requests in one day. Mlpearc (powwow) 18:18, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you see another one that looks like that (young athlete called Uttam indulging in self-promotion), it's a sock of User:Indianathlete2016. Don't bother welcoming - just tag as a sock. He'll be back. If he doesn't get in the 2016 squad he might give up... Peridon (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for notifying me. I'll keep it in mind. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:57, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaheh Hallegua (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bender235 (talk) 10:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PayPal 14, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Jose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for February 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Travancore–Dutch War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pallipuram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odanad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Durga temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imperial Legislative Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Four (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Land reform in Kerala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Help with a certain formatting edit you made.
Hello, I wish to bring to your attention an edit you had made on the BPL Group page, about three months back in Dec 2013.
While the converted US$ values are displayed alongside the INR my issue is with the display of 2014 term values in brackets in the "Performance" section. More precisely with the fact that the INR value while correctly multiplied by the current exchange rate is shown to be exactly ten times more than it is.
One crore (seven zeroes) is ten million (six zeroes). E.g here in the first line of the paragraph US$ 12 million should be Rs 73.2 crores and not Rs 732 crores as is being shown. Every single instance where these 2014 terms come in this issue arises of the value being shown as 10 times more. Kindly rectify this or post back on my talk page on how to correct this and I shall do accordingly. Regards. 117.194.229.67 (talk) 14:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for notifying me. This issue is caused by a problem with the {{INRConvert}} template; I shall try to get it fixed. --Joshua Issac (talk) 08:49, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That was a different issue. The conversion error for crore has now been fixed. The template code was dividing the number given by a million instead of a crore, which was why the converted values were ten times what they should have been. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:28, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for April 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belize–India relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troupe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The name 'Travancore' is an anglicisation of the Malayalam word തിരുവിതാംകൂർ, pronounced tiruvitāṁkūr (as given in the Wikipedia article). 'Travancore' is used more frequently in older articles, but the newer spelling Thiruvithamkoor (or -core ) is closer to the original pronounciation. As this page is of little interest outside Kerala, it would probably be better to use the name used in Kerala, and to provide suitable redirects, with explanation, wherever needed. Please see the section “Spelling and grammar” at 'Travancore:Talk'. Jose Mathew C (talk) 07:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Joshua Issac. You have new messages at Talk:Travancore. Message added 01:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ones' complement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
use because of issues such as the offset of −1, that negating zero results in a distinct [[[negative zero]] bit pattern, less simplicity with arithmetic [[Carry (arithmetic)|borrowing]],
The vast majority of Muslims do not regard Ahmadiyya as a sect of the religion. Even amongst sunni and shia there is consensus that the sunnis and shias are muslims. There is no such established scholarly consensus, ijma, with regards to Ahmadis.
Ahmadiyya believe that the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was not the last prophet - henceforth by rejecting the most fundamental Islamic doctrine after tawhid,
they are considered by the overwhelming majority to be a different religion all together - not an Islamic sect.
Unless you have overwhelming scholarly evidence that Ahmadiyya is a actually a sect across the Islamic thought spectrum then unfortunately it cannot be edited back into the template.
Anyway, appreciate your work on wikipedia.
Happy editing! (Wiki id2(talk) 14:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC))[reply]
i saw you reverted then unreverted, just wondering, is what i did wrong? i see others do it all the time for indef blocked users so I was just following suit.--Львівське (говорити) 14:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Generally, comments from sockpuppets are struck out after they are blocked; this, I observed in the AfD archives. I reverted the strikeout because I did not find any convention towards striking out comments made by indefinitely blocked editors (posted before they were blocked), in general, but I recognised afterwards that it would be easier for the closing editor to discern the blocked editor's comments if the tags that you added next to them were present; so I partially self-reverted to restore these tags. I should have explained my rationale to you immediately after I made the changes, and I apologise for not having done so until you asked. --Joshua Issac (talk) 14:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, just wanted to make sure I wasn't doing anything abnormal --Львівське (говорити) 15:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Padmanabhapuram Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padmanabha (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I just checked at WP:TSC and agree with the hyphens in the current location at ARM System-on-Chip Architecture. This sort of thing might be worth noting for the future. All the best. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 08:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for notifying me. I agree with the change, too; I should have read WP:DASH more carefully before renaming the page. --Joshua Issac (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Page move: Leawood
Hello! I noticed that you move Leawood, Kansas to Leawood. We have a discussion going on at Talk:Leawood#Move page and don't understand the reasoning. Would you please provide some detail why you made the move for this article?--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Financial Switch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seeking word of advice
Hello Joshua Issac,
Myself Yashpal Sengar from Dehradun,India. I am a new user. If you can tell me how to consider whether the material or article which we are referencing from the published book is a good source or poor source of information.
Hello Yashpal Sengar, welcome to Wikipedia. I suggest reading Wikipedia's guideline for identifying reliably sources (WP:RS). It details how one may determine whether a source (like a book) is reliable by Wikipedia's standards, based on who wrote it (someone knowledgable in the field or someone who is not), the publisher (a publisher with high standards or one without), use by other entities (the book is used by scholars or the book is only used by politicians), et cetera. The guideline WP:RS has more details on this. There is also a reliable sources noticeboard, where other Wikipedians will help you find out whether a particular source is reliable or not. If you still have any doubts or questions, feel free to ask. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Pierre-Jules Boulanger.png
Thank you for uploading File:Pierre-Jules Boulanger.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 03:03, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph should be deleted. It is not in the public domain as I had thought it was when I uploaded it six years ago. --Joshua Issac (talk) 02:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Joshua Isaac, thank you for all your contributions to WikiProject India related articles! Keep up the good work as you are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 06:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Praxis intervention, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bottom-up (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Katar (dagger) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
]. They were ornately crafted and their hilts were covered in gold foil. These katar were shown at [[the Great Exhibition] of 1851 in [[The Crystal Palace|Crystal Palace]], [[London]]. Since then,
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Provincial council may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
* [[Provincial councils of Sri Lanka]], local government bodies in Sri Lanka]]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Al-Quds Brigades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your ACC account
Your ACC account is up for suspension. Please log in to reset the counter :) Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
I would like to know about your contributions in Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARUN ARR (talk • contribs) 13:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit: Just thought I'd explain what it was apparently doing there. Wikipedia has murky policies about linking to Tor hidden service addresses (.onion URLs) because they're not registered, are prone to being hijacked, there's a lack of reliable sources, etc. It looks like the screenshot image contains the .onion url, and the caption you removed indicates the existence of the "censored" address there. Should've been caught and removed a long time ago, along with the image, but since Tor Mail is gone now there doesn't seem to be any harm in keeping the screenshot. Anyway, good catch. --— Rhododendritestalk \\ 19:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks for explaining that to me. --Joshua Issac (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Androphobia_(3rd_nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BakerStMD T|C 23:14, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Polyadic space
Hello. I've just done a few copy-edits on the new article titled Polyadic space. In particular, I set the title phrase, polyadic space, in bold type at its first appearance, as is normally done in Wikipedia articles.
However, currently no other articles link to that one. If you know of others that should link to it, could you add the links? Michael Hardy (talk) 20:46, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:Adwaita.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ADDING INFO TO THE PAGE _ ROOP DURGAPAL
Can u please add two new references to ROOP DURGAPAL page
Thanks for making the page look better. But please add "akbar birbal" to her television career section as it was a special guest appearance in a comedy show & is a landmark in her television career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roopfan (talk • contribs) 06:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi . Can you please edit Roop Durgapal's image also ? You can find recent pictures from commons. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roopfan (talk • contribs) 07:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also almora is in uttarakhand not uttar pradesh. You can check the reference link too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roopfan (talk • contribs) 07:07, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi please edit the page roop durgapal well. One user called chander has been removing info added by u & adding false info. The link clearly says she entered akbar birbal in march 2015 as a special guest appearance but he has edited it back to 2014 & removed her special guest appearance role along with her place of birth which is Almora in Uttarakhand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roopfan (talk • contribs) 09:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Uttarakhand did not exist as a state when the subject was born; it was created in 2000. Chander's addition of the 2014 date was most likely a mistake. I will discuss the issue further on the talk page of the article. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence
For fixing up B. R. Ambedkar's page on the occasion of his 124th birthday. -- haminoon (talk) 10:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your vandalization in the wiki page on Kasaragod are not acceptable by Wikipedia standards.
Kannada is one among the prinicipal languages of Kasaragod. Malayalam was elevated as one of the official language only in 1956. Kannada has a history of nearly 800 years in Kasaragod. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpbolumbu (talk • contribs) 20:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have not edited that page for nearly a year, and I have never vandalised that page, or any other page. Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors (see the linked guideline).
Now, on to the matter of the content: Kasaragod does not have an official language. Its administrative language is Malayalam. If you want to add the name of the city in Kannada, then find and add reliable sources to the article to show that Kannada is one of the major language used in the city. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kannada is also the administrative language in the district of Kasaragod. There is no city by this name. Kpbolumbu (talk) 03:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article you linked is about the city, not about the Kasaragod district. I have reverted your edit to the article that added the claim that Kannada is an administrative language in the city. The Languages of Kasaragod web page by the Department of Tourism (Kerala) lists Malayalam as the sole administrative language. Like I wrote before, claims should be backed up by reliable sources. --Joshua Issac (talk) 11:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you have to remove the links which mentioned the administrative languages and add another link which you claim to be original?Kpbolumbu (talk) 16:44, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a copy of my mail to the department of Kerala on the misrepresentation if facts.
"Dear sir,
As per reliable sources Kannada is also an administrative language in Kasaragod district. Please do the needful to add the details of Kannada as second administrative language in Kasaragod.
I am a resident of neerchal in Kasaragod and am aware of linguistic scenario of the district and hence this post. Please revert for clarifications.
I did not remove any links. I only removed the claim you added that Kannada is an administrative language of Kasaragod, because it is not a claim supported by any reliable sources. I added a link to the web page I mentioned above because the claim about Malayalam being an administrative language was not sourced, either, so I needed to add the link as proof that the claim is true.
If the Department of Tourism amends their website and adds information to say that Kannada is an official language of Kasaragod, then it may be added to the article. But this can only be done after such information has appeared on the linked web page, or another source that meets Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline. --Joshua Issac (talk) 19:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Your fundamental viewpoints are quite self explanatory. There was a reliable link which stated that Kannada is the second administrative language. This website has edited the information given in that original source. You also deleted that source. I am the one who added the link (which you have replaced with present unaccetable lnk) which mentioned about Kannada being second administrative language. Even if they don't edit their page I am going to stand up for my language. I live in a democratic nation state.
Facts:
1. Almost all Kannada newspapers have separatly edited pages for Kasaragod.
2. Kannada has existed here since Tenth century CE.
3. Kasara is the name of a tree in Kannada. In the town also there are pure Kannada names like Anebagilu and Koodalu.
4. There are good private and government schools which have Kannada As the main language.
5. Kasaragod has a rich history of Yakshagana which represents the cultural identity of Kannada and its heritage.
Once again, I am going to stand us for my language.Kpbolumbu (talk) 15:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"The official principle languages of Kasaragod District are Malayalam and KANNADA. All orders, circulars, forms, notice boards (including the name boards) should be Bilingual and should be and are available in Kannada and Malayalam.
This system is prevalent from the day Kasaragod was born. Of course I am not the person who is sitting with soft copies of all orders but I am a common man with common sense and general knowledge. Still I am providing you a latest link from the election commission of India.
Please refer the page Number 379 of that handbook in which it clearly states that the approved languages for Kasaragod District are Malayalam and Kannada.
I hope this answers your baseless challenge and proves that Malayalam and Kannada are indeed Principle Languages of Kasaragod " This might help you, this is already there in talk page of Kasaragod town wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpbolumbu (talk • contribs) 04:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was a reliable link which stated that Kannada is the second administrative language. This website has edited the information given in that original source. You also deleted that source. I am the one who added the link (which you have replaced with present unaccetable lnk) which mentioned about Kannada being second administrative language.
There were no sources in the article supporting the claim of Kannada being a second administrative language. I did not delete any sources. The link I presented meets Wikipedia reliable sources criteria, so it is not unacceptable.
Even if they don't edit their page I am going to stand up for my language. I live in a democratic nation state.
Wikipedia is not a democracy. Living in a democratic nation state gives you rights in that state, but those rights do not extend to editing Wikipedia, which is a privately-owned website. All edits to Wikipedia must conform to its policies and guidelines.
The new sources you have provided here do not say that Kannada is an administrative language, but they do prove that it is a significant minority language in Kasaragod, spoken by over one-third of its inhabitants. The correct action per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section#Foreign language and Wikipedia:WikiProject India#Indic scripts in lead is to add a Name section to the article and mention the Kannada name there. I also suggest starting a new section at Talk:Kasaragod to suggest adding the name in the Kannada script to the infobox, and presenting the sources there to support the suggestion. --Joshua Issac (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Missing BC"
Just to note that WP:ERA covers this, we don't change the established nomenclature without a discussion as to why the particular articles should be one or the other. And we actually don't need all the BCE's in that article unless the context makes it necessary. Dougweller (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for notifying me of this issue. I did not actually change the nomenclature, since the section just before the one I edited used AD, which is what I had used as a guide to choose between BC and BCE in my edit. It was not clear from the context whether the referred Kingdom of Judah and United Monarchy were AD or BC kingdoms, hence my addition of the "missing BC". Also, the AD/BC system has been the established nomenclature since 2001, from the first revision of the article, until it was changed earlier today. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Common law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodbridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Reference errors on 17 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pushd and popd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bash. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on File:V8 JavaScript engine logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 15:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Virtonomics. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
--Joshua Issac (talk) 14:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ones' complement may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
