User talk:Joohnny braavoo1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Joohnny braavoo1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that a talk page exists at Talk:List of Turkic dynasties and countries. You have never used it. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at List of Turkic dynasties and countries shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
- LouisAragon (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Joohnny_braavoo1 regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing, ethnic warring, and lack of competence. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. See also your last block message from June, and this complaint that was left on my talk page on April 30. That editor stated "I believe they lack the competency in language, POV, and maturity to edit this encyclopedia properly." Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]