User talk:João Cannabrava

November 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blonde (2022 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Epic" category[edit]

Hi there. I'd recommend probably not spending your time adding that category to articles. It doesn't really make any sense. What exactly is such a vague term supposed to do to help the reader? As you say, it's not a genre. It's vague and subjecting, and probably doesn't pass WP:DEFINING. I imagine it will be nominated for deletion. Sergecross73 msg me 14:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then we should name "category: science fiction video games" and "category: fantasy video games" for deletion too, João Cannabrava (talk) 15:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those are established video game genres, as reported by reliable sources. I have never heard of a source describing a video game as "epic" in the genre sense. WPscatter ^t/_c 17:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Those are not vague categories. Sci-fi and fantasy are well-defined genres and cannot be mistaken for something subjective. Epic on the other hand reads like "awesome" if one's unfamiliar with the genre/theme. ~~ lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 17:34, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Epic video games has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Epic video games has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. silvia (inquire within) 17:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- ferret (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]