User talk:Jngilmar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problems with Image:PT658 wiki.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded, Image:PT658 wiki.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Ytny 03:30, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of depth[edit]

Thanks for the source on PT boat. A minor note: watch out for deleted spaces when you take out tags... (It's EZ to miss them, I know.) And welcome! BTW, if you want to "blue" your userpage, let me know; I'll let you have any userboxes I've got, or links to where they are, & any help I can be. Trekphiler (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not copy and paste text from commercial media into Wikipedia[edit]

Your addition to Z Special Unit has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Nick-D (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jngilmar. You have new messages at Nick-D's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talk page posting[edit]

Hi, Jngilmar. I saw your message to me at the PT-658 talk page and replied there. Thanks for your work on the article. Although it is OK to use the edit summary to make very brief comments that are directed to another specific contributor, it is better to post those message on that contributor's talk page. In this instance, I still saw the message right away, because the PT-658 article and its talk page are on my watchlist (which I check frequently when online and logged in). My watchlist is also how I learned about your recent edits to the article so fast. One other thing I wanted to mention: When you post on any talk page (an article's talk page or a contributor's/editor's talk page), you should "sign" your post by writing ~~~~ (four tildes) at the end, which gets converted automatically to your user name (with a link to your page) and the date and time when you save the page. Using the "show preview" button will also convert the four tildes into that kind of "signature", in case you want to try it without actually saving your post, or before you've finished writing your post. SJ Morg (talk) 08:35, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at PT boat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - BilCat (talk) 02:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]