User talk:Jhv.wilder

This is Jhv.wilder's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Jhv.wilder. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:11, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diannaa, I apologise if some of my initial edits have not met with Wikipedias standards, I hope to improve and be able to add in a small way to the quality of content on the community going forward. Regards Harry

Jhv.wilder (talk) 22:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wallingford Rowing Club (July 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wallingford Rowing Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wallingford Rowing Club, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jhv.wilder! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Jhv.wilder, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Wallingford, Oxfordshire have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:55, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please do not insert duplicate pictures on the Waitrose article, one pic is quite enough. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 12:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Agatha Christie into Wallingford, Oxfordshire. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:12, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Wallingford, Oxfordshire[edit]

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Today I found some additional copyright violations in your additions to Wallingford, Oxfordshire. I already warned you about this on August 2. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law and the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:39, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa,

I apologise it is not my intention to violate the policies of Wikipedia, I believed that I had adequately referenced the sources which were open sources without copyright, some of the texts are over a hundred years old.

I am new to this and have only just worked out how to reply to you hence another apology for the lateness of my reply. My intentions are however good and if you find more infractions in my existing work I would appreciate the chance to re-write them. Regards Harry

August 2018[edit]

I realise that you are new to Wikipedia, but please stop your current promotion of all things relating to Wallingford - they are unnecessary. Also please stop the excess linking of Wallingford and read WP:OVERLINK, which explains overlinking. Thank you and regards, David J Johnson (talk) 10:10, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi David you are correct I am a recent user of Wikipedia and as such would welcome advice from a user with your extensive experience. especially with items such as linking.

However, I must point out that there is a difference between what you call "promotion" and simply taking on an underdeveloped page and including it where relevant on other pages. The historical/location/other pages that I am including Wallingford in are pages that it should have been included in at an earlier junction. Just because up to now it has been overlooked does not mean that to should continue. I am sure you would agree with that sentiment. With regards to your deletion of anything that I am putting up it is appearing prejudicial I am researching and improving the Wallingford page therefore it makes sense to add this information into other pages where it is omitted, as an example Agatha Christie did die in the town of Wallingford at her home of Hithercroft house therefor that is a factually accurate addition.

I hope you can see that this is being done with the best of intentions of improving the resource and falling out with other members of the community is not something I came here to do. I look forward to working with you in the future. Regards HarryJhv.wilder (talk) 10:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You will note that I have corrected a large number of typos in the text of Wallingford. Please check your contributions by using the "Show preview" button at the foot of the page before publishing any alterations/new content. Also much of the recent additions read like a travel guide - something that Wikipedia definately is not. David J Johnson (talk) 19:31, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another point: each addition needs to have a citation. Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for information on this topic. I've placed some more handy links at the top of this page. Another great resource is the Teahouse, where you'll find editors experienced in helping new users. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see further comments on your contributions to Wallingford, Oxfordshire on the article Talk page. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 22:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jhv.wilder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wallingford Rowing Club[edit]

Hello, Jhv.wilder. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Wallingford Rowing Club.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]