User talk:Jeremiah/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Thank you for reverting that nasty vandalism![edit]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to the page about Kurt Cobain's death. You must have spotted it right before I did. I was about to revert it in accordance with policy, but you beat me to it. As soon as I saw it, and realized that it had to be vandalism, I began to research the procedure for reporting/reverting vandalism, since this was my first time seeing any. By the time I got past the wikipedia:vandalism policy page, you had already fixed it (I assume that was you). I dislike seeing my user name anywhere near such stuff. I hope you placed one of those blatantvandal warnings on the talk page of the offender, as I was about to (try to) do. By the way, your user page is impressive. 

Anyway, my question is: How does one figure out who vandalized a page?

Fellow wikignome Oatmealcookiemon

The picture in "Indiana University Art Museum"[edit]

Can you please describe the picture in "Indiana University Art Museum?" Is it a generic museum, or that museum specifically?

—Vespristiano 23:04, 2004 Jan 10 (UTC)

IU Art Museum pic[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Artmuseu.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell (talk) (help)[[]] 17:35, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)

Trellick Tower pic[edit]

I've uploaded a colour picture of Ernö Goldfinger's Trellick Tower, which was requested on image requests. This makes Image:Trellictower.jpg, which you uploaded, an orphan and obsolete, so I've put it on Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Just wanted to let you know. Dbiv 18:24, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Chemistry portal FA[edit]

Hi,

I just wanted to explain why I reverted gramicidin from being the FA on the chemistry portal. When the portal was set up we (at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry) agreed to just use articles that had achieved FA status for this purpose. The person who set up the portal, User:~K, has taken on the responsibility of picking the "FA of the month", and we are trusting that we can generate enough FAs to keep the page supplied. Until the gramicidin article achieves FA status, I'm afraid it shouldn't be put as the portal featured article. Please consider joining the WikiProject, or the related Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals so we can get your help in writing the next chemistry FA! Cheers, Walkerma 17:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, thanks for the prompt reply. One of the best ways is sign up here and/or here, then to look at the Chemicals worklist (well established) or the Chemistry worklist (not substances, & still pretty new). Find a topic or set of related topics you want to work on, then maybe tell us with a note in the comments column of the worklist or on the project talk page. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to ask on the appropriate project talk page. The chemists on Wikipedia are a friendly group, so people will try & help you out as much as possible. Thanks, Walkerma 18:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:O-chlorophenol.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:O-chlorophenol.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tardigrades.jpg[edit]

While completing the move of Image:Tardigrades.jpg to Commons, I tried to clarify the somewhat ambiguous license tag on the image. Could you please check that the tag ({{CopyrightedFreeUse}}) I placed on the image accurately reflects the actual permission given, or change it if it doesn't? Thanks for your time, —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 22:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to Great Pyramid of Giza[edit]

Thanks for cleaning up the damage. I was having a literall war with that prankster and he was vandalizing as quick as I could revert and try to lay in a warning. Not sure how that one last prank was left in the article. Maddening to say the least. Open edit policy from IP addresses doesn't help at all (my two bits). Cheers, HJ 14:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canalbridge300.jpg[edit]

I have tagged Image:Canalbridge300.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Chick Bowen 17:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for United States Civil Flag[edit]

I removed this entry from the AfD log as no afd had yet been started. Please follow all the instructions at WP:AFD#How to list pages for deletion. Steps 2 and 3 appear in the box that will be on the article's page after you add the {{subst:Afd1}} tag. Regards, Flyguy649 talk contribs 18:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you figured things out! Flyguy649 talk contribs 19:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Are you concerned that people haven't agreed to delete? Don't be! Your nomination was in good faith. Flyguy649 talk contribs 20:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's since been closed as delete and deleted. see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Civil Flag. Cheers, Flyguy649 talk contribs 14:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Us-civil.svg[edit]

Jgassens, the image you nominated for deletion is on Wikimedia Commons, and therefore cannot be deleted through Wikipedia. I commented at the deletion page and then noticed this, and so removed it. My argument for why it shouldn't be deleted is, however, below:

  • That's not a valid reason for deletion. Also, the image was generated my me from an existing raster image. A search on the web will show countless references to this design—it is quite notable. The fact that it is not an official flag is completely irrelevant to whether or not it should be kept. What your argument behind the 50 stars comment is, I do not know.

If you decide to attempt to have it deleted on Commons, you will, I hope, notify me of this so that I may make my voice heard. Lexicon (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I don't see it that way. The article states that it is not a flag of the United States. There are plenty of unofficial flags on Wikipedia. If enough people are using it as a civil flag, it is irrelevant that it is not an official civil flag. That's not to say that I feel that it's terribly relevant, but the fact that it's not legally recognized is not an issue here. It's also not a "hoax" in the way you're thinking—the flag's "creation" may be a "hoax", but the article is not a hoax, it is a description of the flag and its history (however recent). Lexicon (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for informing me. Lexicon (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't take it personal[edit]

Don't worry about it. Just tone it down on the talk page. People have different views. Most are open to new ideas (I am--note how I changed my vote). As for calling you reversion vandalism, it wasn't anything personal and was in no way a negative reflection on you. As was pointed out by an admin, it is bad form to remove such information when the issue is the quality of sourcing. People looking to discuss the deletion need the full picture about the article. Deleting what may, or may not be a quality source hinders this. No hard feelings. CraigMonroe 01:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flag[edit]

I believe I've been convinced now that, contrary to my original opinion, we really don't need an article on this. >Radiant< 12:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:1GRM.gif. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:1GRM.pdb.gif. The copy called Image:1GRM.pdb.gif has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome to the MCB project. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch. All the best Tim Vickers 16:28, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rotaxane image[edit]

I wanted to thank you for expanding the synthesis section. I hope you don't mind that I updated the illustration that you added. M stone 21:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week[edit]

WikiProject Pharmacology is currently organizing a new Collaboration of the Week program, designed to bring drug and medication related articles up to featured status. We're currently soliciting nominations and/or voting on nominations for the first WP:RxCOTW, to begin on September 5, 2007. Please stop by the Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week page to participate! Thanks! Dr. Cash 17:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week[edit]

Aspirin has been selected as this week's Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week! Please help us bring this article up to featured standards during the week. The goal is to nominate this at WP:FAC on September 10, 2007.

Also, please visitWP:RxCOTW to support other articles for the next COTW. Articles that have been nominated thus far include Doxorubicin, Paracetamol (in the lead with 4 support votes so far), Muscle relaxant, Ethanol, and Bufotenin.

In other news:

  • The Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology main page has been updated and overhauled, to make it easier to find things, as well as to highlight other goals and announcements for the project.
  • Fvasconcellos notes that discussion is ongoing regarding the current wording of MEDMOS on including dosage information in drug articles. All input is welcome.

Dr. Cash 00:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paraquat[edit]

Sorry about that. I was looking at [1] listed at the bottom of the page, and so I thought what you filled in was in error. --Rifleman 82 14:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update[edit]

Here's a brief update in some of the recent developments of WikiProject Pharmacology!

  • Aspirin has just completed its two week run as the first Collaboration of the Week! Many thanks to those editors that contributed; the article got a lot of good work accomplished, and in particular, much work was done in fixing up the history section. It's still not quite "done" yet (is a wikipedia article really ever done?), but after two weeks I think it's more important to push onwards with the development of the new collaboration of the week program. I will be fixing up Aspirin in the next few days and possibly nominating it for either GA or FA status.
  • Please remember that Wikipedia is not a forum for discussing or dispensing medical advice amongst users. Specifically, talk pages of articles should only be used to discuss improving the actual article in question. To help alleviate this situation, the template {{talkheader}} may be added to the top of talk pages, reminding users of the purpose of such pages. Additionally, unsigned comments and comments by anonymous users that are inappropriate may be removed from talk pages without being considered vandalism.

You are receiving this message because you are listed as one of the participants of WikiProject Pharmacology.

Dr. Cash 04:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Possibly unfree Image:1GRM.pdb.gif[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:1GRM.pdb.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. C.m.jones 09:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC) C.m.jones 09:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Pharmacology Update[edit]

Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:

  • The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to Collaboration of the Month, based on current participation levels. It is also more likely that articles collaborated on for one month are more likely to achieve featured quality than articles worked on for only a week or two.

Dr. Cash 22:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Diphenylene.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Diphenylene.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:07, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:O-chlorophenol.gif missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:O-chlorophenol.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diphenylalanine.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Diphenylalanine.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 14:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion[edit]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gramicidins3d.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gramicidins3d.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion[edit]

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

See new chem project proposal[edit]

See new chem project proposal

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry/Participants#Proposal_for_project.

Michael T. Strianese[edit]

I have to take issue with your edit summary here; calling a redirect "subverting the system" is uncharitable at best. In order to make it past speedy, an entry only has to make a claim to notability, this is a far lower standard than actually being notable, see here for the exact wording. CEOs are not notable simply by virtue of being CEOs of notable companies. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jeremiah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jeremiah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jeremiah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jeremiah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Homodimer.JPG[edit]

Notice

The file File:Homodimer.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra (logo).jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeremiah/Archive_1&oldid=1150574714"