User talk:Jer10 95/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your recent edit to Space Colonization has been removed. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Michaelbusch 21:05, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:WEAF014975_450.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:WEAF014975_450.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I have submitted the article Partal space shuttle Discovery disaster for deletion, since it just duplicates material from STS-114, the word "partal" appears to be a misspelling of "partial", and the incident described was not a disaster, since the damage involved was minor at most and no deaths or injuries resulted. --Metropolitan90 22:58, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Putting my things in deletion
Would you please Stop deletiong things that are made my me. Here is the Things that you deleted or will be deleted :
- Partal Space Shuttle Discovery disaster
- Template: On launch pad
- LaCrosse technology, Is on the the Article: Lacrosse (disambiguation)
- Space Colonization, Created by another person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jer10 95 (talk • contribs)
- Your articles are being deleted or tagged for deletion for good reason. Please refer to the list of links placed by SchuminWeb above for how to write articles that won't be deleted. Tonywalton | Talk 12:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on La Crosse Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why La Crosse Technology is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:La Crosse Technology. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Tonywalton | Talk 12:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Lacrossetech.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lacrossetech.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 16:30, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
