User talk:Jan Filein

For User Rr123456 (and/or other Mad Dogg Company fans)[edit]

Dear Rr123456, since I was born I am the male and not female. Please stop referring to me as to "she".

I also don't own any Aerospinning company. Please, stop fabricating stuff just because I am Czech and I happen to live in capital city where you obviously have some legal problems. Please, stop stalking me on Facebook. Yes, I am regular visitor to GoFitness gym which as far as I know is not in any legal battles and even if it were I don't care as long as they don't rise cost of their spinning lessons.

And yes I am attending spinning classes there (plus in one other place in Prague) which I believe does not make me perpetrator in any conspiracy of Czechs against your employer Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.

I understand you are defending your employer but this is not a reason for any kind of censorship on Wikipedia. Seeing people trying to suppress information makes me angry and even more determined so your actions are if nothing then counterproductive. OTOH I admit that I can make mistakes so if I do, please, point the mistakes to me with proper explanation I will do my best to avoid any types of mistakes. I would like to make quality contributions to Wikipedia.

Also your manipulation attempts on indoor cycling and Mad Dogg Athletics pages is taking my valuable time and forcing me to focus on few articles I originally didn't have any intention to get stuck with. And I really don't enjoy some silly revert-wars just to preserve my few contributions (that I - as a newbie - was so proud of and thus I took extra care to make them objective and well sourced...).

Please, stop threatening me on my Discussion page. We are civilized people - if you want to influence my views and/or actions then use arguments and not threats.

I repeat my invitation for an argument-based discussion on any topic I contributed.

--Filein 01:20, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Your recent editing history at Mad Dogg Athletics shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Drmies (talk) 21:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're also obviously not editing in a neutral manner in that article. Whatever the other side does is irrelevant: you should edit neutrally and provide only information that's backed up ty reliable sources--and given the sources you had been adding (which were unacceptable) I'll point you to WP:RS. There is enough disruption at that article, and the next thing to happen, if this continues, is the blocking of editors. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know about three revert rule. I will act accordingly. --Filein 08:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, you probably should have read this warning, and various other guidelines and policies, before you threw yourself back into that edit war over this copyright stuff. You are blocked for 48 hours. Drmies (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, you have a point there. I am not appealing then. --Filein 11:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Unfortunately the only outcome so far is that the facts were again removed from the article[1] without any real discussion taking place (despite your call for discussion). But Wikipedia is a collaboration tool so I leave it for others to care. I hope that the only "others" who persistently care will not be exclusively Mad Dogg Athletics employees. --Filein 11:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Drmies (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]