User talk:J-stan/Archives/2007/June
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Editor review
I reviewed you. Shalom Hello 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
My signature
Hi; I have no wish to give offence, but my signature is bright red with the "talk" in black, and several editors have commented on the brightness and harmony of the colour combination. Do you have a software problem?--Anthony.bradbury"talk" 23:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I can see the difference now. didn't catch the talk part. That's actually pretty cool! J-stan 23:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
emotive
FYI "emotive" is a word. It's a synonym of "emotional, but is used almost exclusively to describe art and music (as far as I know) to denote a particularly emotional/emotive piece, when "emotional" isn't quite the right word. Emotive gives a sense of process (like the words "constructive" or "deductive" do), whereas emotional makes it sound less like a process and more like a mood. But in the context of the article, "emotional" is better, since it's talking about somebody's mood! That's my random trivia FYI for the day. See you 'round. --Cheeser1 03:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ok I see now. I think if we really put in some effort, We can really improve the emo article. It's a matter of hard work, and a lot of reverting vandalism. J-stan 15:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Hi J-stan/Archives/2007. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance. |
|