User talk:Itsonline6
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Itsonline6, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 10:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
April 2023[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
You have tried this edit twice now with no success. Please review WP:EPTALK and consider discussing your proposal on the article talk page. Further attempts without discussion may be considered disruptive. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
September 2023[edit]
Edits like this one involve words or phrases that we consider to be a form of loaded language, known on Wikipedia as puffery or "peacock terminology". It can also been seen as a weasel word that isn't supported directly by a reliable source. When editors make these assumptions, it is considered original research. Please avoid these kinds of words and phrases unless you are quoting a source. If you have any questions, leave me a message or ask for help at the Teahouse. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)