User talk:Indimpdd

Nomination of Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Red links

Please read Wikipedia:Red link. Red links for subjects that should have articles but do not, are not only acceptable, but needed in the articles. They serve as a clear indication of which articles are in need of creation, and encourage it. Please do not remove red links unless you are certain that Wikipedia should not have an article on that subject.

I am fairly sure that there should be an article called either City Today (newspaper) or Mysuru Today. I am not sure what exact relationship is between them. If you are going to cite Indian newspapers in articles, then it is very much in your interest that there should be articles on those newspapers, because it helps readers realise that you are citing independent reliable sources.

It is of course true, that too many red links in an article can be a problem.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

User:Toddy1 So, you want me to create a article for City Today (newspaper) ? Indimpdd (talk) 12:10, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Oh yes please-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, Sure.Indimpdd (talk) 12:23, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi

I was surprised that you started Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi. The content:[1] "No reason for deletion the page ? Indimpdd (talk) 13:38, 2 August 2020 (UTC)" reveals that you have not understood why the page was deleted. This worries me because, my impression is that you are a good person, who is sincerely trying to make Wikipedia better.

People explained their reasoning for and against deleting the page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Hamza Ashraf Kichochawi. I am not asking you to agree with people. But please make an effort to understand their point of view. There will be other deletion discussions about other articles in the future. -- Toddy1 (talk) 15:35, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

I have answered all the questions in favour to the page i created but their was not reply for my comments, so i sayed that there should be clean reason in deletion log for deleting the article, so i can understand when and how to edit the page and make it better and notable. Indimpdd (talk) 17:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

But people did reply to your comments in the discussion. Several people in the discussion made reference to WP:GNG. Because you insisted that the sources cited in the article were good quality sources (you were right, they were), I put in a table showing how the sources matched up to the guidelines in WP:GNG. I also fixed problems with how the sources were described in the article. The sources only mentioned him in passing.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

People did replied me but not commented on all my points on page and the reference were reliable and independent of the subject so i think the reference was enough to prove him notable. Indimpdd (talk) 13:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahmad Shah I, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sorath. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:47, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arshadul Qadri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nazim Al-Haqqani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 20:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello, i want to work on this article; Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf. Can someone help me to make this deleted article as a draft so that i may make this article good, i have left a message to the deletion administrator but there was no respond for my message, so please someone help me !Indimpdd (talk) 14:30, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Indimpdd, So this article was deleted by a deletion discussion, which means that the article is not notable, i.e. the guy is not famous enough to have an article. It will not be undeleted so soon after a deletion discussion. I reccomend you focus on editing some existing articles for a while to get a feel for what is and isn't notable, before making articles from scratch. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

User:CaptainEek, I intend to work on it and i want it to move to draftication, further the reviewer will notice down that the article is notable or not, so i will help the article to make notable and add reliable sources. Indimpdd (talk) 12:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

A deletion discussion also determines what is and isn't notable. This deletion discussion found this page not notable I'm afraid. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 19:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Tafsir e Ashrafi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tafsir e Ashrafi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Syed

I don't think that adding even more references should be the main focus on the Syed article. It is the quality of the references, and even more importantly, you should focus on the article text and explain what Syed has done throughout his career. Geschichte (talk) 14:39, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Geschichte, If the article is moved to draft i will add all the details what he have done throughout his career.Indimpdd (talk) 12:51, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tafsir e Ashrafi (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tafsir e Ashrafi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tafsir e Ashrafi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Indimpdd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tame (talk) 05:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf

Hello, Indimpdd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tafsir e Ashrafi has been accepted

Tafsir e Ashrafi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Tafsir e Ashrafi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tafsir e Ashrafi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafsir e Ashrafi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf (March 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Deleted in 2020 which means sources would need to show something since that time to merit notability. Unfortunately, the sources in this draft all precede that time so no sense in evaluating them. Based on the moves back and forth to draft, I would suggest AfD should this be moved into mainspace again. And, requesting page protection from creation at the conclusion of the AfD.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:36, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf

Hello, Indimpdd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Syed Mohammed Noorani Ashraf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 22 September 2023 (UTC)