User talk:ImperatorExercitus/Archives/2009/March

Re:Welcome[edit]

Thanks a lot :) I've just installed Lupin and Twinkle. Nice page, by the way...ForHerMajesty (talk) 22:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...i just noticed all your thousands of working against vandalism...that just blows my mind away! is there a way that i can reward u? ForHerMajesty (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your thousands of anti-vandalism edits (and for bringing me here!) ForHerMajesty (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ForHerMajesty (talk) 22:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...thanks a ton! Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 22:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA nom[edit]

Hi, ImperatorExericitus. You nominated England as a Good Article, but it was kinda premature.

This shows you've edited the article less than 10 times and had never edited it before late yesterday; in fact, on a closer look, it looked like you nominated it before having touched it. Articles containing multiple cleanup tags, and other significant content problems, cannot pass as a GA. I removed it from the nominations list and explained why on the article's talk page as that seemed the best course of action in this case.

Your enthusiasm for pushing articles on the 'pedia toward GA is admirable. If you intend on nominating or reviewing articles in the future though, you should please first make sure that you are familiar with the criteria and how they are applied to the article under review. You can find information on that at WIAGA (also RGA) and GNGA. Thank you kindly. –Whitehorse1 13:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! Now that I look back on it, it does seem sorta early...anyways, I'm going to work on it for some time, and then renominate it after all the issues on the talk page have been fixed. Again, thank you! Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 13:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome—and props for taking the feedback graciously! :) Good luck with the article; it looks like a project big enough to keep someone busy for months! –Whitehorse1 16:07, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heh...I'll probably take a few months; anyways, I've formatted a list for the Engineering and Innovation and replaced a bunch of bad refs w/ better ones (mainly books now) Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 16:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

how did you get the number of links to update on the Wikipedia:Disambiguation_pages_with_links page[edit]

--Anshuk (talk) 04:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I actually counted the remaining ones manually, which can be easily done by setting the limit to 1000+ and then reducing the numbers with each go. For example, 1000, then 500, then 100, then ~3. Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 12:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what the? you gotta be kidding.. :) Thanks anyways. --Anshuk (talk) 15:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Admin Coaching (Again)[edit]

Well, aside from the admins listed at the coaching page, a post to WT:RFA might attract some willing admins. Regards, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Park[edit]

I've undone this edit. I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but it hasn't worked; as far as I can see every single change has either made the prose more awkward ("located in", "all property had"), or changed the meaning to something completely inaccurate ("although the river was culverted soon afterwards, land between the river and Lordship Lane developed". – iridescent 22:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the review at WP:ER! I'll keep what you said in mind. When you say I've had edit-conflicts with you, d'you mean with Huggle? Anti venin 11:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beano/done Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 12:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! So I'd guess you aren't using Huggle? Huggle's pretty fast. Anyway. Apologies for that one. =P I'll go a bit slower next time. :) Anti venin 13:36, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. We'll talk later. Cheers. Anti venin 13:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Brachistrone[edit]

It makes no difference to me, although the user may have been looking for the real article to do his homework and wrote this when he/she couldn't find it. Also, I thought WP:HOMEWORK applies only to help and reference desks. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 18:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks for the heads-up, I didn't even notice that the banner was still there. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 21:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Burning of the Valleys[edit]

Besides sharing a name - the book you linked to in the AFD for that article seems to be about a completely unconnected series of events. Can you elaborate further the connect between the two? --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beano/done Cheers. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 02:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Pringle (Royal Navy officer)[edit]

Please restore this article which has not had adequate discussion per the normal AFD process. In particular, discussions should remain open for 5 days. Colonel Warden (talk) 11:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beano/done

Pringle is certainly real and so the article should have been stubbed and kept for improvement per WP:IMPERFECT. Please could you userfy it for me. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

...for increasing the quality of the article England! When I asked you to improve an article about England, I didn't expect that much... Here's a little treat:

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Here's for all your work on the article England, whether it be fixing/adding references, copyediting, or adding more information. Keep up the good work! ForHerMajesty (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, how did you get the little notice on the top of your talk page? The one with the "evertime you click "save this page"...". ForHerMajesty (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-down load | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Ta[edit]

Heh, thanks for the thanks :). Happy to have helped. - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Str sniper rifle[edit]

is a copyvio. It might be a good idea to check when there is no wikimarkup on the page at all. Lets drink Tea 01:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. However, I Prodded it for inclusion, which it also meets. :) Cheers. I'^mperator 01:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweden[edit]

http://sydsvenskan.se/kultur-och-nojen/article416044/Forfattare-sagar-forslag-om-fusion.html | http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsydsvenskan.se%2Fkultur-och-nojen%2Farticle416044%2FForfattare-sagar-forslag-om-fusion.html&sl=sv&tl=en&history_state0=

http://sydsvenskan.se/kultur-och-nojen/article410869/Svenska-bocker-laggs-ut-pa-Google.html | http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsydsvenskan.se%2Fkultur-och-nojen%2Farticle410869%2FSvenska-bocker-laggs-ut-pa-Google.html&sl=sv&tl=en&history_state0=

http://blogg.sydsvenskan.se/mildner/2008/11/18/vad-vinner-vi-vad-forlorar-vi/ | http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fblogg.sydsvenskan.se%2Fmildner%2F2008%2F11%2F18%2Fvad-vinner-vi-vad-forlorar-vi%2F&sl=sv&tl=en&history_state0=

http://sydsvenskan.se/kultur-och-nojen/article341290/Waltics-manga-ansikten.html | http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsydsvenskan.se%2Fkultur-och-nojen%2Farticle341290%2FWaltics-manga-ansikten.html&sl=sv&tl=en&history_state0=

http://sydsvenskan.se/kultur-och-nojen/article312174/De-svarade-pa-enkaten-om-fildelning.html | http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsydsvenskan.se%2Fkultur-och-nojen%2Farticle312174%2FDe-svarade-pa-enkaten-om-fildelning.html&sl=sv&tl=en&history_state0=

∗ \ / (⁂) 21:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC) :)[reply]

Done. Enjoy! Cheers. I'^mperator 21:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFC/R[edit]

I know it's a pain, but do you know that we we try to keep track of all articles (including redirects) created through AFC? For redirects you can just add

{{WPAFC|class=redir}}

to the talkpage. By the way, thanks for all your good work in the project! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I didn't know that! Thanks for the heads up. ^_^ Cheers. I'^mperator 10:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know question[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Bovista nigrescens at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Or should I say, fixed :P Cheers. I'^mperator 22:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (DYK)[edit]

Hi, thanks for verifying my entry at Template talk:Did you know (about Arthur W. Ryder). And thanks also for saying "nice work". :-) Shreevatsa (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no problem! :) Could you return the favour by reviewing my DYK submissions? They're the Bovista nigrescens and Agaricus lilaceps articles under March 22. Thanks in advance! Cheers. I'^mperator 13:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry I took so long to reply. I was told that "returning the favour" was somewhat frowned upon, and I saw that your hooks have already been verified now (great!), so I decided to pay it forward instead and verified some 5–7 hooks :) Cheers, Shreevatsa (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) (Also, feel free to move this back to my talk page if you'd rather it stay there than here.)[reply]

Meh...no problem ;) In fact, I've just gone and verified a few more hooks too =D Cheers. I'^mperator 00:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for February has been published. March's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 19:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Agaricus lilaceps[edit]

On March 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agaricus lilaceps, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 04:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Agaricus lilaceps veil.JPG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agaricus lilaceps veil.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 16:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, with File:Agaricus lilaceps.JPG, there is no indication on the website that the material is released under the GFDL. A great source for free images of mushrooms (if there aren't any on Wikimedia Commons) is Mushroom Observer. Any of the images uploaded under CC-by-SA-3.0 (but NOT CC-by-NC-SA-3.0) may be used freely. If you still can't find anything, try listing it at Wikipedia:FUNGI#Pictures. You're welcome to contact me on my talk page if I can be of any help. J Milburn (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry I uploaded the two images; I must have misread the copyright :/ Thanks for uploading the image that is now in use for Agaricus lilaceps! :D For some odd reason, mushroom observer isn't working for me...Could you delete the two unfree images for me? Thanks. Cheers. I'^mperator 17:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mushroom Observer is a little slow at times. I'll delete those images now, thanks for understanding. J Milburn (talk) 17:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bovista nigrescens[edit]

On March 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bovista nigrescens, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 01:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]