User talk:Iamthedeus

This user may have left Wikipedia. Iamthedeus has not edited Wikipedia since March 24, 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Iamthedeus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Tim Q. Wells 05:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Filmmaking Announcement[edit]

A PROPOSED PROJECT MERGER with WikiProject Films is under consideration. All opinions and questions are strongly encouraged! Girolamo Savonarola 01:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to List of popular songs based on classical music[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of popular songs based on classical music. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Will ^(talk) 21:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections[edit]

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Censorship[edit]

I am in strong agreement over the censorship of Wikipedia. I believe your statement regarding censorship in the "profanity" article is correct and in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. However, I must stress the importance of following guidelines in relation to the discussion page. Please see my note on the discussion page of the "profanity" article. If Wikipedia guidelines are not adhered to, there is a risk of being banned -- this obviously applies to all users and is not a personal threat. Thanks for your time. --82.11.217.185 (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your response to my post in the Profanity discussion page; I have responded there. Do you have an account (thus user page) or do you always edit anonymously? If you would like to discuss the matter of my post further, I believe it would be wise to keep it out of the Profanity discussion page as it doesn't really pertain. --Iamthedeus (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved here[edit]

As the discussion about the appropriateness of my comment in the Profanity talk page did not really pertain to the Profanity page or to the content of what I was saying, I have moved it here. Iamthedeus (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not the person that edited the article, and in fact I agree with your point on not editing out these profane words. You provide guidelines for others on how the main article should be edited, yet you breach guidelines which apply to this edit page. The Wikipedia guidelines clearly state that "personal attacks" and "insults" (Wikipedia then cites two examples, calling someone an "idiot" or a "fascist"). Wikipedia also clearly states that users should not "threaten people". I believe the phrase "So fuck off, cunts" is a clear breach of both these guidelines. Your post is excessively long, and so I would request that the post be edited to be shorter and to be in line with Wikipedia guidelines. My post may be deleted once this has taken place. --82.11.217.185 (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would have to disagree somewhat with your assertion that my post included "personal attacks" and "insults". The vast majority of what I was saying doesn't qualify as this because everything I was saying was (in my opinion) true, not just blind insults: "Of all the places to impose your irrational and fascist obsession with ..."; "you dogmatic little fucks". Well, they were being irrational and fascist and dogmatic, as I was stressing throughout my post. And these were not ad hominem attacks; they were quite content-related criticisms, because it was the irrationality and dogma of these people that was the very cause of the problem I was addressing.

However, even if you disregard this, what I wrote still couldn't be classified as personal attacks, because throughout I was clearly not addressing only one person (presumably the person who censored the words), but rather censormongers in general; hence "if some of you dogmatic little fucks" and "So fuck off, cunts". Nonetheless, I do admit that the latter was largely an expression of anger and isn't saying anything relevant (as the other ones are), so I've removed it (though I'm not sure how you figure it qualifies as a threat).

Also, I do agree that my post was overlong, so I've deleted some of the more superfluous parts. In any case, I appreciate your bringing these points up, but I believe that most of what I had was acceptable for the reasons I've just outlined. Perhaps, if you see this and want to discuss it further, you can give me your account name and we'll discuss it on our talk pages so that we don't clog up this page. Thanks --Iamthedeus (talk) 01:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spot Welders - please advise[edit]

I am trying to resolve the NPOV issues with the Spot Welders article. They are a post-production and editorial house. Would you please review the article and make any changes or else notes in the talk page? thanks! Shamus00 (talk) 04:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections[edit]

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. You can also add your name to any of our many task forces!

It's also time to start the WikiProject Films coordinator selection process! We are aiming to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open![edit]

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

The September 2008 WikiProject Films coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of candidates. Additionally, we are keeping nominations open during the voting period, in case any additional editors wish to nominate themselves. Please vote here by September 28!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning up vandalism[edit]

Hello, when you encounter vandalism, please revert it rather than trying to clean it up manually. An IP editor vandalised the structure article, and then you simply removed the malformed section heading rather than restoring the article to its previous state. I've cleaned up the article, but it's important to know how to fix vandalism in case you encounter it in the future. Graham87 06:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rusty chain[edit]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:RustyChainEdit1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Iamthedeus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]