You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for supporting me in the RFA. I am grateful for your response, and it really means a lot to be appreciated. Thanks again! hmwithtalk 09:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You supported my candidacy in my recently completed request for adminship. The debated ended 40/4/1 and I'm now an administrator. I'd just like to say thanks for taking the time to consider me, and thanks for the confidence in me. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified.
Just wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 09:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for participating in either of my unsuccessful requests for adminship. Although the experience was frustrating, it showed me some mistakes I was making, and I hope to learn from those mistakes.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Terence, next time you're on IRC please come to the #countervandalism channel so we can review your ban that was placed on you from the VCN. Thanks! -Pilotguyhold short 20:34, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for commenting on my RfA, which closed successfully with a tally of 76/0/1! I hope I will meet your expectations, and be sure I will continue trying to be a good editor as well as a good administrator :) If I may be of any assistance to you in the future (or if you see me commit some grievous error :), please drop me a line on my Talk page.
Again, thank you, and happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Terence, your !vote on this is placed midway in the oppose section but your edit summary said s, and because you offered no rationale for !voting either way, I just wondered if this was what you'd meant to do. Cheers! The Rambling Man 12:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you visiting and commenting at my RfA, I have tried to expand on my philosophy and answers, and hope that these address your concerns. Even if they don't, thanks for stopping by. DrKiernan 12:41, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you still drop by from time to time, please take a few minutes to revisit that particular RfA. I believe that some of your concerns have been adressed and that strong arguments against the "no need for tools" argument have been made. So perhaps you will change your mind. Best, Pascal.Tesson 14:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi - I would request you not to remove the entire passage as my statement was an important addition from my side. I most strenuously object to the removal of my core statement. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 19:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was that really you? I find the edit summary uncharacteristic of you. Resurgent insurgent 14:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sent you an email. And yes that was me. RegardsTerence 13:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for your support in my recent RfA, which passed successfully at 40/2/1, making me Wikipedia's 1,250thadministrator. Your comments were much appreciated, and I will endeavour to fulfil your expectations as an admin.
Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:23, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for supporting my RfA, which closed successfully yesterday... W00t! I hope to be a great admin (and editor) and I'm sure you can tell that my use of a large, boldfaced, capital "T" and a big checkmark image in this generic "thank you" template that I swiped from some other user's Talk Page that I totally mean business! If you need anything in the future or if you see that I've done something incorrectly, please come to my Talk Page and let me know. So now I've got a bunch of reading to do.... see you around! - eo 13:36, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I64s. Thank you for your support and kind words in my RfA, which passed with 95 support, 1 oppose, and 1 neutral !votes. It means a lot to me to have your individual support and the collective support of so many others. I truly will strive to carry myself at a level representing the trust bestowed in me as I use the mop to address the never-ending drips of discontent in need of caretaker assistance.
Hiho, we seem to have a bit of a situation going on at Anglo-Chinese School. Would you be so kind as to weigh in? Thanks =) InfernoXV 18:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 17:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You opposed my RFB, citing a possible conflict of interest. I'm not sure if you're aware, but I've said that if made a bureaucrat, I will not write any stories on bureaucratic actions, and I've also agreed that if, for some reason, it was believed that I had used one power inappropriately with respect to the other, that I would resign my bureaucratic bit immediately. Ral315» 14:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Terence, you originally indicated here that you were interested to attend the meetup. However, due to the lack of response, the date of the meetup has been changed to November. Please refer to this page for more information. -- ZhongHan(Email) 04:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Terence, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3).
I shall continue to work on behalf of the community's interests and improve according to your suggestions.
Most sincere regards, Húsönd 23:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obrigado, Terence, por participares no meu RfB, que terminou sem sucesso com um resultado final de (80/22/3).
Continuarei a trabalhar em prol dos interesses da comunidade e a melhorar segundo vossas sugestões.
Calorosos cumprimentos, Húsönd 23:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks in part to your support, I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to live up to your confidence and kind words. Andre (talk) 09:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
