User talk:HotHat/Archived Talk of 2012-05

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2012[edit]

I reverted your edit to a date at Ashes Remain. Per WP:MOSNUM, dates come in the following order: day, month, and year.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

True, I've seen WP:STROGNNAT, but let me explain that the Wikipedia community has pretty much adopted the DMY style, and editors are expected to use it. I recommend you consult someone more experienced for this scenario, as it is too complicated for me to explain from start to finish. Also, I don't understand what you mean by Ashes Remain is "based out of the US."
Also, a closer glance at some of teh BLPs you've created has revealed to me that they might not be notable, and I will be considering an AFD.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Charts[edit]

Both are available on Billboard.biz, but that requires pay. The pages I use:

What those are is a mirror of the weekly Billboard chart. These update every week as well. You can't find older charts on these, however.Toa Nidhiki05 13:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's very, very difficult to find chart data since they want you to pay - thankfully Nielsen BDS posts the charts online, but it is still only weekly and you can't find old archives. I'd love to see data from the Christian Digital Songs chart, but I haven't found a way to see that chart yet.
Great job on the Christian music articles, BTW - the topic is severely underrepresented on here. I've done what I can on artists I like, but it is good to see other editors working to improve CCM articles. :) Toa Nidhiki05 16:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Lost Get Found. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zhou Yu (talk) 04:39, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Moriah Peters for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moriah Peters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moriah Peters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 22:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andy Cherry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Cherry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Cherry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 21:31, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Cappa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Cappa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Cappa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 21:42, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Free (Dara Maclean song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Housekeeping-useless; does not meet all criteria at WP:SONG. (Requesting rd to You Got My Attention)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 21:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back[edit]

Hello, HotHat. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added 22:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hello, HotHat. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:Help[edit]

I've commented on a few of them but you might want to avoid requesting help from multiple people at one; while in this case you are bringing in editors with experience in the topic area, some people might accuse you of meatpuppetry. I don't think that is the case but others may view it oppositely. Just be careful. :) Toa Nidhiki05 22:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppetry is when you give another editor specific directions on how to participate in a discussuion. This is more of a case of canvassing. HotHat--you can bring issues to a large audience--and avoid canvassing--by posting a neutrally worded notice at a wikiproject, e.g. WT:XNB. Good luck! TTFN – Lionel (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Will follow in future, Thanks!HotHat (talk) 04:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Samestate[edit]

Looks fine to me. Charted song, and I see a couple sources. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 05:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for creating the Samestate article, and working to improve Wikipedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto for me--keep up the great work. You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Lionelt's talk page.Lionel (talk) 08:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luminate[edit]

I honestly don't think there is an option other than .biz unless you can somehow find an archive online... It's unfortunate but the full chart is only available on .biz. :( Toa Nidhiki05 12:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wish I can get a membership at some point but I don't have the money currently. Toa Nidhiki05 22:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nomination 2004 Estoril Open[edit]

Hi, please note that the article 2004 Estoril Open has been nominated for deletion along with the subarticles Men's Singles and Men's Doubles. Discussion can be found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 Estoril Open--Wolbo (talk) 23:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Input[edit]

Thanks for telling me... I'm surprised they don't have a page, honestly. Toa Nidhiki05 00:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Christian artists are sorely underrepresented here, and you do great work finding them and giving them solid articles. Keep it up yourself. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I really have nothing to add since my deletion was nearly three years ago and the article had gone through the AfD being discussed one year after my deletion. Was my deletion correct back then? Probably not since there was some claim to notability with the connection to Delirious?. However, my opinion is that the AfD supersedes my speedy deletion. The discussion on Seraphimblade's talk page pretty much covers what you should do. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Barnstar
Thanks for bringing One Sonic Society back from the dead. Fences&Windows 08:45, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]