User talk:Historyday01/Archive 7

2022 comment

hi! Have you seen emojitown? Its a new animated series on YouTube, Joanie (the pink haired character) is LGBT (see episode 'when your crush doesn't like you back') Babpp (talk) 18:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

I haven't, but I'll have to give it a try. Historyday01 (talk) 18:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for adding more content and doing some cleanup to the BCPL re: unionization drive. The changes look great. 69.243.31.235 (talk) 15:42, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks! I heard about it in the news a while back and I was glad it was added on here. There's also a unionization drive at the Pratt too, which I was glad to see as well. Historyday01 (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hailey's On It! (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Casualdejekyll was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hailey's On It! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

casualdejekyll 04:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok, that's fair. I wasn't sure if it was time to publish it yet, or not. But, I imagine there will be some news about it which will come in 2023, especially about its exact release date, as that's usually what Disney does before releasing a new animated series. Historyday01 (talk) 04:19, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Maryland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital News Service.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited LGBT rights in Massachusetts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cotton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Notifying

Hello! I saw your notification about Cardcaptor Sakura Clear Card at WT:LGBT, and would suggest leaving a similar neutral notification at WT:ANIME (a WikiProject concerned with the article), lest someone accuse you of WP:CANVAS. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 21:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

@RoxySaunders Ok, sure I can do that. Historyday01 (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aztec Batman: Clash of Empires

Hello, Historyday01. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aztec Batman: Clash of Empires, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kara Eberle (April 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kara Eberle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Well, I'm not altogether surprised by this result. I wasn't even the one that submitted it for review, as I created it as a draft and wanted to work on it more. I will say that Eberle's main role is voicing Weiss Schnee in RWBY presently, so that's what most of the articles are. I already created a Google News alert for Eberle and if any more articles come across, I'll be sure to add them in. Historyday01 (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Historyday01! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Bob Morley

As the BLPN discussion shows, the entire removal was based on issues with the sources themselves for a contentious BLP topic. You're on your 3rd revert by the way. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I only did it because I wanted to make a point, to put down my thoughts for the record. As I said in my message, PLEASE participate in the talk page discussion on Talk:Bob Morley before removal of content. If there is consensus there to remove the section, THEN the content can be removed. You are just jumping the gun on this, which I find sad to see. Historyday01 (talk) 19:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

WP:BLPRESTORE, WP:BURDEN and WP:ONUS does not work that way with contentious BLP topics. Soni removed the entire section on a good faith BLP objection over the sources. Giving a variation of That's the best we got and continuing to use them is not fixing the issue. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Ok, but it still seemed like you are jumping the gun on this. I proposed compromise text which Soni said was fine, so I implemented it, which seemed like the sensible thing to do. It is as simple as that. It almost seems like you didn't read/follow the discussion at Talk:Bob Morley#Reliability of sources. This whole discussion (especially on the Morley page) is growing very timesome, and your wrongheaded edits aren't helping. These discussions are why I generally dislike writing biographies, but there's no backing out of this discussion now. Please do not contact me about this topic on my talk page ever again. Thanks. These issues should be hashed out on the BLP noticeboard and the Talk:Bob Morley.Historyday01 (talk) 19:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Give it a day for uninvolved editors to chime in on the BLPN thread. If Soni decides to reinstate your compromise text, I'm not going to object either. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

I said uninvolved editors.[1] Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)