User talk:Hellofriendshello
Hellofriendshello, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Hellofriendshello! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC) |
July 2020[edit]
Your recent editing history at International Baccalaureate shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
WP:BRD does not mean that you ignore a removal and restore your content, and it does not mean that you post something ot the talk page and immediately restore it yet again. It means that the contested content is discussed on the article's talk page until editors reach a consensus on what should be included. Meters (talk) 23:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Hellofriendshello. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page International Baccalaureate, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. As you've stated clearly at Talk:International Baccalaureate, both yourself and a big enough number of your friends that you needed to express it as a magnitude were directly affected by what you are writing about. If that's not a conflict of interest, I've never seen one. Pleass follow best practices as outlined in the links contained in this message, and restrict your editing on the subject of IB in the COVID19 world to edit requests on the article's talk page. This isn't the place to try to affect any kind of change. See WP:ADVOCACY and WP:RGW. Thanks John from Idegon (talk) 04:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Savaajankovic, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Jasper Deng (talk) 17:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 02:57, 10 July 2020 (UTC)- For advice on avoiding future blocks: generally if you find that you are facing disagreement over content you are adding to an article, it is more productive to discuss and achieve consensus first before attempting to restore the content. Repeatedly reinserting content in light of disagreement is considered edit warring and can lead to blocks, even if you are "right" about the content—see the edit warring policy for more information. Mz7 (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)