User talk:Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out.
Awesome username! William Ortiz (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out. (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome[edit]
Hello Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out., and welcome to Wikipedia! We're really glad you've chosen to sign up for an account; it offers numerous benefits in case you weren't already aware of them.
Thankyou for your contributions if you've been editing before you got this message. If you haven't, don't worry: there are numerous ways you can contribute to Wikipedia if you're not sure where to start yet. Either way, we hope you'll like the place and decide to stay. We all remember what it's like to be new, so don't let others scare you off.
Useful links[edit]
Here's some useful links that will help you get started.
Wikipedia:How to edit a page - it's a lot easier than you might think.
Tutorial - a collection of pages explaining the most important things for contributing to Wikipedia.
Sandbox - the best place for trying things out. If previous edits you made to articles have been reverted because they were experimental or unconstructive, this is the place to make test edits.
Wikipedia:Where to ask a question - Wikipedia has numerous places for you to put your questions and comments forward.
Wikipedia:Five pillars - Wikipedia's official policies and guidelines are summarized here.
Wikipedia:Manual of Style - our style guide outlines our standards for ensuring that we present information in a consistent manner that promotes cohesion and professionalism.
Contributing[edit]
With these references at hand, we hope you find it easier to contribute to Wikipedia. Here's a brief synopsis of some ways you can:
- We obviously wouldn't have an encyclopedia without articles. This page shows how you can help them grow.
- Removing vandalism and keeping the integrity of articles intact is a great way of contributing. More information on how to do so can be found here.
- Fixing typos, correcting poor grammar and repairing broken links are just some examples of useful, behind the scenes contributions. Even just making things look nice makes using Wikipedia more pleasant for everybody.
- If you like working with images, you might be interested in the Graphic Lab. Similarly, this page shows you how to work with images in Wikipedia articles.
- This page lists the many types of tasks you can do to maintain Wikipedia.
- There are numerous WikiProjects that aim to provide coordination and collaboration on particular subjects. From this list, you can join a project and contribute within an area that interests you.
Of course, there are many ways of contributing, but I hope that this message is helpful to you, and that you'll enjoy editing Wikipedia and continue to do so. You can respond to this message by clicking here if you have a comment or need help - don't forget to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page and write your query there. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! WilliamH (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks!--Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out. (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks![edit]
Thanks for the copy edit on Ubuntu! Very helpful! --Falcorian (talk) 07:18, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Mozilla Firefox[edit]
Please understand something. Vandalism is editing to intentionally cause harm or detract from a page. Removing inane chatter that is unrelated to article improvement is not only NOT vandalism, but is an established practice under talk page guidelines.--Oni Ookami AlfadorTalk|@ 19:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just FYI, I filed a formal WP:WQA complaint here, in part because of what I consider to be a personal attack against you. Please add that page to your watch list until resolved. Thanks. --Art Smart (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
I thought I'd drop by and explain why the RD templates are considered high-risk -- it's not a case of "balls" being added temporarily. Rather, a persistent malicious editor has found a way to exploit Wikipedia's interface and template system such that the entire screen is replaced by a picture (usually of Avril Lavigne). It's difficult for us to track down the attacked page, and until repaired, it's impossible for anyone to use any page on Wikipedia that includes the attacked page. So it's not just a question of users temporarily seeing "Ref Desk: Balls" between Entertainment and Miscellaneous. A fix to the underlying software has been requested, but until that's implemented, this sort of preemptive protection is likely to remain the norm. I hope this explains why we've taken the stance we have. — Lomn 19:22, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Unblock[edit]
Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What makes Alison think I'm Primetime? I don't see any relation.
Decline reason:
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Primetime confirms that you were using the same IP address as him. That's a pretty good indicator. Please request unblocking on your main account only. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:33, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I can tell you with about 100% certainty that I am not Primetime or using the same IP address as Primetime. Could Alison paste the results of the checkuser here? I'd love to see this. It's complete B.S.
Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I can tell you with about 100% certainty that I am not Primetime or using the same IP address as Primetime. Could Alison paste the results of the checkuser here? I'd love to see this. It's complete B.S.
Decline reason:
Try emailing her. According to our privacy policy, checkuser results cannot be publicly posted. However, I'm about 100% certain Alison knows what she's talking about and wouldn't have marked it confirmed if it wasn't certain. Now please stop abusing this template, it's supposed to be used to request unblocks only. — Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello. I'm new here, but I'm sure I can help out. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can Alison respond with an explanation of why I am Primetime? Hersfold doesn't know anything, yet says that he's 100% certain that I am Primetime. Try not to cover up your stupid mistakes. I want a full accounting of them in public, here.
Decline reason:
Probably could, but I looked at the checkuser report and it checks out - no pun intended. You'll stay blocked and I'm protecting this page. Toddst1 (talk) 23:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.