User talk:HarryPotterNot

{{unblock}} I Think I Should Be Unblocked . First You Should Explain What I Did Wrong. HarryPotterNot (talk) 19:25, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I WIll FInd A Way To Be Great Person Here . Look I Do Not Know WHat I Did Wrong Here. HarryPotterNot (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Explain REason ..[edit]

Can You Explain WHat I Did Wrong Here . HarryPotterNot (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarryPotterNot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Have Not Been Explained Of How Come I Was Blocked . There Is No Explanation No Proof. HarryPotterNot (talk) 20:00, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A good first step regaining your ability to edit would be to stop creating multiple accounts. TN X Man 20:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I THink THis Person Should Be Unblocked Too . ip|1=173.178.93.250 HarryPotterNot (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Block ..[edit]

{{unblock-ip|1=173.178.93.250|2=Wikipedia is not a toy.|3=TenOfAllTrades}}

| For TnxMan ..[edit]

Okay Boy . I WIll Stop Making Multiple Account Here. Now What SHall I DO. HarryPotterNot (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I Know WIki Pedia Is Not A TOy . I Did Not Say It Was. Did I. HarryPotterNot (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How Long Am I Blocked For . HarryPotterNot (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarryPotterNot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

.. I Real Want To Be UnBlocked . This Is Not Right. HarryPotterNot (talk) 21:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Sandstein 21:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HarryPotterNot (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Understand What I Have Been Blocked For And Will Not COntinue To Make Disruptive C omment . I Will Make UseFul Contributions Instead. HarryPotterNot (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no reason to believe you - especially since after you said this, you did this edit. I recommend that you go away from Wikipedia for a few months, then come back and try requesting an unblock again, and refrain from any edits off this page, from any account or anonymously, until you are unblocked. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The note about multiple accounts aside, while I don't immediately see a reason not to assume good faith here, I feel that, based on the syntax, formatting, etc., of your contributions, WP:COMPETENCE might be an issue here. Could you be more specific as to (a) what you believe led to this block, (b) what behavior you would change, and (c) what you plan on editing? --Kinu ^t/_c 22:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: since I blocked your IP address 173.178.93.250 (talk · contribs), I am not going to handle your unblock request. Your statement, "I Understand What I Have Been Blocked For And Will Not COntinue To Make Disruptive C omment" seems unconvincing to me considering your list of edits on 173.178.93.250 and your multiple blocks. Please explain how you plan to edit constructively and how will you go about in doing so. Elockid ^(Talk) 23:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]