User talk:CommsPro123

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Hankypanky789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 20:19, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CommsPro123. You have new messages at Ashbeckjonathan's talk page.
Message added 01:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

My talkpage is not for paid editors. Here and at Talk:Service delivery platform you have admitting to being a paid editor, so I'm not going to help you. For reference, I don't have the time to adopt people anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Service delivery platform. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Don't remove talkpage comments, as you did here. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up on edits and experimenting. I'll use the sandbox and won't engage in any further edits on the delivery services platform talk page. Hankypanky789 (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CommsPro123. You have new messages at Ashbeckjonathan's talk page.
Message added 21:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 21:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

CommsPro123 (talk) 16:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How do I find an editor to help me edit my first article? I'd like to make sure all the necessary elements are included, and I've already reviewed the "create your first article" page, as well as articles on notability, reliable sources, and the correct tone to use in the article.

If I believe I have a conflict of interest, can I still publish pages/submit articles for review?

Looking to avoid trouble.. Very new to this and already got scolded once for accidentally editing a page I hadn't even realized I'd edited.

Thanks!

I guess I could help/adopt you. Need any specific thing? Also, we strongly suggest not to make articles that you have a conflict of interest in, because you might not use a neutral point of view. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Xavient Information Systems, from its old location at User:CommsPro123/sandbox. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. APerson (talk!) 18:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CommsPro123. You have new messages at Ashbeckjonathan's talk page.
Message added 23:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 23:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CommsPro123. You have new messages at APerson's talk page.
Message added 02:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

APerson (talk!) 02:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xavient Information Systems (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xavient Information Systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, CommsPro123. You have new messages at APerson's talk page.
Message added 18:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

APerson (talk!) 18:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Xavient Information Systems has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Xavient Information Systems. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 07:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Xavient Information Systems has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Xavient Information Systems. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 04:33, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Citing Outside Press Releases as Sources

I'm working on finding sources for a new article and within Wikipedia's guidelines, read that press releases issued by the company the page is being developed for are not acceptable, since they are not "independent sources." However, are press releases from a separate organization that mention the company acceptable?

For example, if I am writing a page about Blue Elephants Inc., I will not use any press releases put out by Blue Elephant. But if Google puts out a news release mentioning Blue Elephant and its products, am I allowed to cite that release as a source?

Thanks,

CommsPro123 (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In your hypothetical situation, I'm not sure that Google would release a "press release" mentioning Blue Elephant. They might have a news story, but there would be no reason for them to have a press release. The issue is the depth of coverage. If Google had an article where they said "Many companies build widgets. One such company is Blue Elephant" then you could use that to verify that Blue Elephant makes widgets, but since it is only a trivial mention it would not demonstrate notability. You need significant coverage, not just mentions. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 18:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying between notability and being allowed to use information from another company's news story, Primefac. My question though is really if I'm allowed to use another company's press release as a source when I'm building a page. (I admit using Google as an example wasn't the best idea.) I understand your point that mentions, whether in a news release or news story, don't constitute notability. Notability aside for the moment, could I use another company's press release as a source? Thanks and sorry for the confusion! CommsPro123 (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xavient Information Systems (August 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please, I would not resubmit as all of this is boiling to there simply not being enough substance for confidently establishing its own notability yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Xavient Information Systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Xavient Information Systems[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Xavient Information Systems, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It is a rejected submission at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over six months. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — O Fortuna!^{Imperatrix mundi.} 18:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adopt-a-user[edit]

Hello. This is a courtesy note to inform you that I have removed the "adopt me" template from your User page. You have not been active on Wikipedia for a considerable time. Its presence misleads others into thinking that you are still seeking to be adopted and to be guided by another editor under the Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user scheme. Obviously, you are free to reinsert it if you return to active editing and want to seek adoption again. (Just 'undo' my edit in the history of your user page to put it back). For simple questions about editing, just ask any of us at The Teahouse. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 04:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]