User talk:HadeanJohn

Welcome![edit]

Hello, HadeanJohn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:HadeanJohn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deppty (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Deppty, thank you for the message, albeit a deletion can hardly be considered warm.

I thought the purpose of the user page was to identify oneself as seen here User:Deppty. Apologies for the amateurism on my part. Do I not need a user page to be auto-confirmed later down the line?

Thank you. HadeanJohn (talk) 16:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:HadeanJohn[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:HadeanJohn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Deppty (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, HadeanJohn. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hadean Supercomputing, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hadean Supercomputing moved to draftspace[edit]

I have moved Hadean Supercomputing back to draft space. As a paid editor representing the company, you should not create or edit articles about the company. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 11:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadean Supercomputing (June 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hadean Supercomputing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hadean Supercomputing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HadeanJohn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 12:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadean Supercomputing (June 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not interested in the routine business activities of the company; a Wikipedia article about this company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Please also see WP:ORGDEPTH and Your First Article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hadean Supercomputing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hadean Supercomputing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @331dot and thanks for reviewing the article. Your comment is much appreciated. I will re-edit the piece and condense to purely independent sources. However, I'm curious to know your thoughts on the article here. It contains direct company website links, a large number of unreferenced statements and references with no significant coverage - all of which are breaches of the notability and independence standards. Here's an example. HadeanJohn (talk) 10:35, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see other stuff exists. Each article or draft is judged on their own merits. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. We can only address what we know about. If you want to use other articles as a model or example, use those classified as good articles. I have marked the article you pointed out as problematic. If you would like to continue to help out, you are welcome to identify other problematic articles that need attention. We could use the help. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hadean Supercomputing (July 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Press releases (straight up or warmed over) and interview-based coverage are not the in-depth coverage in independent secondary sources that we're looking for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hadean Supercomputing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 09:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stuartyeates. There are very few firms that are involved in providing the Web 3.0 infrastructure that's bringing about the metaverse, arguably increasing need for such an article. That is why the company has been independently covered by tech publications like TechRadar, VentureBeat and TechCrunch.

Also, per WP:ORGCRITE: "A company, is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."

- Surely breaking a world record of most concurrent players in a single virtual battle is noteworthy? Covered in an independent feature by various outlets including VentureBeat.

- Millions of dollars in investment funding is also a huge point of interest, particularly when it comes from tech giants like Epic - covered by Bloomberg.

- In the world of defence, the company is also drawing frequent media attention with new multi-million partnerships as seen here in features by Shephard Media.

- The impact of Hadean's technology is also picked up by national media like the Daily Express, as seen here..

All of these examples represent earned coverage that reflect Hadean's impoartance as a deep-tech company.

Please help me spot the difference with references seen in a larger, but similar company, such as this.

The draft only refers to a historical timeline and there's no product placement.

I look forward to hearing from you. HadeanJohn (talk) 16:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hadean Supercomputing moved to draftspace[edit]

Please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As you have already been advised, you should not move the draft to mainspace yourself. bonadea contributions talk 17:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:HadeanJohn, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=HadeanJohn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 17:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hadean Supercomputing[edit]

Hello, HadeanJohn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hadean Supercomputing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hadean Supercomputing[edit]

Hello, HadeanJohn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hadean Supercomputing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]