User talk:HPK at DevResearchEval

This is HPK at DevResearchEval's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome![edit]

Hello, POEV Evaluation, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you very much for this! We would be happy for you to review this article (on Scaling Impact). I had perhaps misunderstood that the article would automatically be reviewed when we submitted for review given we declared a potential conflict of interest -- but this would be a pre-review that you are suggesting? We are open to it.

We are a bit unsure of how the review process proceeds - I notice a couple of comments appeared. Are we required to address them or who decides what needs to be addressed? Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

On the username - I can request a change of username using the link you have shared, thank-you!

POEV Evaluation (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewers are experienced editors, and are the gatekeepers to paid editors creating articles. Since you are receiving comments from gatekeepers there is a strong pragmatic need to take them into account. Not doing to will hinder the putative acceptance of this draft as an article (0.99 probability)

That a thing is Creative Commons elsewhere solves copyright issues, but does not solve wording. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. It does not care what an entity wishes to say about itself. Instead, it records what others have said about the entity in references.

Wikipedia is an amateur project. Paid editing is tolerated bit not encouraged nor assisted except by serendipity. Put plain, why should an amateur editor help a paid editor get paid for editing Wikipedia? You are being paid to learn how to write and to write. Thus you should be able to produce material that is immediately acceptable. If not then you provide the entity paying you with no vale, even negative value by virtue of not getting it right. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:30, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you! I received a rejection of submission later from a second reviewer, which made clear the next steps of editing and resubmitting. HPK at DevResearchEval (talk) 18:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scaling Impact has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scaling Impact. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:24, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you. I have again tried to edit it down to cut the wordiness-- I am not sure how much simpler it can be made without losing all meaning. Presumably, someone interested in this topic and looking to learn about it on Wikipedia would already know what the linked terms mean, or would be willing to follow them and find out as needed. Are there specific terms that you find are not understandable or don't make sense in this paragraph? As for "word salad" article linked in your comment, note the definition on that page suggests it is a "symptom of a neurological or mental disorder.". I can assure you that is not what this lede is... it is written by people who know this topic very well and this is not particularly constructive (in fact, probably not very appropriate) feedback. ~~ HPK at DevResearchEval (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scaling Impact has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scaling Impact. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:25, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scaling Impact has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scaling Impact. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:58, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scaling Impact (July 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

Impenetrable, despite comments about the lede.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scaling Impact and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HPK at DevResearchEval! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scaling Impact (August 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There appears to be a single secondary source for this article, but that source does not contain the bi-gram "scaling impact." Without secondary sources there can be no tertiary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scaling Impact and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 03:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scaling Impact[edit]

Hello, HPK at DevResearchEval. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scaling Impact, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scaling Impact[edit]

Hello, HPK at DevResearchEval. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scaling Impact".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research Quality Plus[edit]

Hello, HPK at DevResearchEval. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research Quality Plus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]