User talk:Goodtiming8871/Archive 5
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to MILHIST
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Anotherclown (talk) 09:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Peace Treaty with North Korea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article appears to imply that there has been a diplomatic attempt to have a "Peace Treaty" with North Korea, when this has in fact not happened. It is also written in a poor standard of english and does not provide any proof or evidence, merely stating "Peace Treaty with North Korea is a peace agreement with North Korea will be an agreement to end the war officially on the Korean Peninsula as a follow-up to the 1953 Armistice Agreement, which was intervened by the United Nations after the Korean War." The article seems to be based on ones own personal view that current geopolitical events could eventually lead to a peace agreement, however, there is very little, if any evidence to support that this has been proposed at any diplomatic level as of yet. While I would like if such a peace treaty was agreed upon, this article contains fictional information.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Dear Fayenatic London, Thank you for your contribution and helping our global community via Wikipedia. With respect to your diligent work for helping numerous people in several countries, I believe that you would be a good role model for the valuable hero of internet world for our children. :) Concerning the enhancement task of the topic above and other articles, I would keep talking to my friends near my place and in other countries, and find the way to help our society via Free Encyclopedia like Wiki. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 22:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Peace Treaty with North Korea for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peace Treaty with North Korea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peace Treaty with North Korea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 04:11, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of ZETRON
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on ZETRON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:43, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
Technology update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225
General project update:
- On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
- Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
Technology update:
- Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
General project update:
- The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
No underscores in wikilinks
@Goodtiming8871: In this recent edit you added a wikilink with an underscore (_) that should have been a space. (I corrected it.) Please keep this in mind in the future. For further examples of properly formatted wikilinks, see MOS:LINK. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
@Goodtiming8871: I looked at some of your other recent edits and noticed that you edited at least a couple of 'See also' sections that had lists of wikilinks in alphabetical order, and you did not maintain the alphabetical order when you added more links. Please try to keep these lists of links in alphabetical order if they are already in such order. Thanks, Biogeographist (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your kind guide, the alphabetical order : it would be useful for other people Goodtiming8871 (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Mindfulness Acceptance and Commitment Therapy listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mindfulness Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Since you had some involvement with the Mindfulness Acceptance and Commitment Therapy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Biogeographist (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Brisbane meetup - Sunday 10 December 2017 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Sunday 10 December 2017 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Goodtiming8871. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
New Years new page backlog drive
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup: Saturday 13 January 2018 at The Edge, State Library of Queensland
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
 | |
If you are in or near Brisbane, please join us on Saturday 13 January 2018 any time from noon to 4pm at The Edge at the State Library of Queensland. For more details and to sign up, please go to the meetup page. See you there! Kerry (talk) 05:34, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Donate icon
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
- We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
New Year Backlog Drive results:
- We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!
General project update:
- ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
- Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Goodtiming8871
I'd look into trying...but I'm not on a computer! (I'm on a phone) :'-( --Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 06:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- OK! Thanks, Gdtmg8877--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 06:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Seo Hoon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 07:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
- updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.
For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
New Page Review Newsletter No.10
ACTRIAL:
- ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.
Paid editing
- Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
- While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.
News
- The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Inter-Korean House of Freedom has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
ToThAc (talk) 13:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018
ACTRIAL:
- WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.
Deletion tags
- Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.
Backlog drive:
- A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
Editathons
- There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
Paid editing - new policy
- Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.
Subject-specific notability guidelines
- The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
- Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Not English
- A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.
News
- Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
- The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 North Korea–United States summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
5G
Hi - your section on "Deployment of 5G infrastructure" (and accompanying plot) doesn't really make technical sense or fit into the flow of the article. I imagine other people will come along and delete it as well. Hawerchuk (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Hawerchuk, Would you be able to elaborate your thought why it does not make technical sense if possible? I would be able to update the content if necessary. From my understanding of deployment of 5G infrastructure, the millimetre waves of 5G frequencies and the previous 3G/4G network which is centimetres waves; it would be the significant difference between 5G and 4G network because of the requirements of small cells to cover distances of 250-300 m Goodtiming8871 (talk) 02:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi - I think you made the edits "Network Bandwidth", "Deployment of 5G Infrastructure" and "Small Cell". They are not technically accurate. e.g. "Network Bandwidth" says sub-6 GHz throughputs with 64-QAM are ~ 4Gbps, but it cites an article talking about how mmWave 64-QAM deployments get 4 Gbps. Hawerchuk (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Hawerchuk, regarding the previous reference below,
<ref>https://telecom.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/some-aggressive-oem-partners-may-launch-5g-smartphones-this-year-qualcomm/64095139Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page).
" The average user experience can be quite different due to usage of massive MIMO and beam forming techniques in 5G. Now, for millimeter wave on the other hand, we use 800 MHz of spectrum, but we use a lower order modulation; we use a 64 QAM there. But in spite of that, we actually get to 4 Gbps, so there it’s not so much on the difference between 28 and 39 GHz because the amount of bandwidth is the same... What matters is the ability to have a dense network, a very dense topology and then making sure that all the beam-steering and beam-switching algorithms are implemented in the network. And as long as you have that, the user experience is again pretty good."
It is a simulation of the peak network bandwidth with a 64 QAM modulation between 28 and 39 GHz(millimetre wave),
I did not add this previous reference value to the chart as it is not the real-world style tests but peak rate simulation. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 05:12, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I have no idea what you mean here. My suggestion is to remove the sections or make them technically accurate. Hawerchuk (talk) 16:59, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi User:Hawerchuk,
As you might be busy and I also busy, I don't have enough time to explain all of your inquiries although I answered three of your inquiries.
If you think your point is correct, please place the reference to your point as I placed the proper references for my technical description. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 10:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
2018 North Korea–United States summit
Hello, I'm Signedzzz. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2018 North Korea–United States summit without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. zzz (talk) 06:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. zzz (talk) 09:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please don't create the disruptive edit as zzz removed my reply of zzz's question, and removed the previous talk subject - I don't think that it is allowed action on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines - the dated of zzz's action: on 09:42, 15 June 2018
I don't believe that it was a disruptive edit if I left reason for the edit after replacing the contents. I recovered the contents and subject. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 05:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
NPP Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Goodtiming8871, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.
Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!
- As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
- Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar:
. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 
, 
, 
, 
. - Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Mobile Phone radiation and health Effect
- Please refrain from making edits about Mobile phone radiation and health and 5G (about 5G and health) without first seeking consensus on the Talk page for your changes, rather than engaging in multiple reverts. As a long-time contributor to the article about Mobile Phone Radiation and Health, I can say it is contentious topic, and it is best to discuss changes at Talk first.
- Edits about health issues/effects must rely on WP:MEDRS, a higher standard than the usual WP:RS
- I realize English is not your first language, but I find it challenging to understand some of your comments. I will try my best to understand you, and hope you will try your best to be as clear as possible.
- On Talk pages, make sure to thread your comments, where appropriate, so that other editors can more easily follow the discussion thread.
--papageno (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi papageno, Regarding 5G and health, Mobile phone radiation and health, I agree that it is disputable agenda. I will check the health issues/effects with WP:MEDRS - reliable sources: regarding the EMI and Human Health issues. EMI and Human: it is getting too much closer.... That's problem. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- No, I did not use the word disputable (click for definition), I said contentious (click for definition). It is not disputable at all.
- How dangerous radio waves are to human health is generally related to how energetic they are when they arrive at a human being and follow well-understood laws of physics.* Distance between a transmitter and recipient is only one factor. Frequency, terrain/built environment, and interference from other transmitters are three more. Power output of the transmitter base station, antenna type, cable type and cable length from transmitter to antenna are still others that combine to give a factor called effective radiated power at the transmitting antenna. Proximity to a radio source is not, by itself, a problem.
- *Yes, biology and physics are two separate branches of sciences, but biology cannot contravene the laws of physics.
- PS See How I've threaded your comment and mine using colons to create indents? It makes it easier for users to follow a conversation. Read more at Wikipedia:THREAD in the section titled "Indentation".
- --papageno (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Qui1che, Thank you for your update. Goodtiming8871 (talk)
Re.: "User page - about me" at User talk:Qui1che
Message added 23:30, 22 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your secondary account
I don't understand why your secondary account has an unconnected name, wouldn't it make more sense to delete that account and create one called (for example) Goodtiming8871b, to avoid potential accusations of sockpuppetry if you and your secondary account both post to the same page? Rolf H Nelson (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Thank you for your kind suggestion, I saw other experienced people use the secondary account with the different name to the primary account ID and just notifying it to their user page. However, I would try to replace the old one with the similar name later - (example: goodtiming1788?) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sounds like a good idea. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited IP PBX, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
|
Hello Goodtiming8871, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
- June backlog drive
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
- New technology, new rules
- New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
- Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
- Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.
- Editathons
- Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.
- The Signpost
- The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse reply
I replied to your Teahouse question. You can click this link and scroll to the bottom to read it: WP:TH — pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 01:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. zzz (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Brisbane meetup
Come along! Kerry (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
|
|
Brisbane Meetup
|
| |
Brisbane meetup this Saturday
This is just a friendly reminder of the Brisbane meetup that is occurring this Saturday at the Queensland Art Gallery café, which you have expressed an interest in attending. Please check the meetup page as some of the details may have changed since you last looked. I look forward to seeing you there! Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Archiving_a_talk_page manual
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Archiving_a_talk_page/Archive_1#Alternative_methods
Cut and paste procedure
Simplified procedure for archiving
|
|---|
That is it, you are finished! |
Archiving_a_talk_page Automatic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Archiving_a_talk_page
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- IP PBX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Audio
- Panmunjom Declaration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Donghae
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 North Korea–United States summit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Yi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of David C. Kang (disambiguation)
A tag has been placed on David C. Kang (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
- disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Gorthian (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
It's redirected to the David Kang (disambiguation) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |