User talk:GiantSnowman/2024

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Fish slice

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Carbon source (biology) • Online encyclopedia

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Administrators' newsletter – January 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).

Administrator changes

added Clovermoss
readded Dennis Brown
removed

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:54, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Happy New Year, GiantSnowman!

Happy New Year!

GiantSnowman,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks, same to you! GiantSnowman 15:16, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Take a look

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FC_Steaua_Bucure%C8%99ti#

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadionul_Steaua_(2021)

Discussion and unexplained format reverts happened in these cases, just if might be able to clear things. Even few seasons have linked non-existing club:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1191506236 93.138.220.238 (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

WP:AIV against vandalism / WP:RFPP for page protection / WP:ANI if the community needs to take a deeper look. GiantSnowman 18:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Pedro Muñoz (Chilean footballer)

Happy New Years and hope you had a great holiday break!

Also, any chance you can merge Pedro Muñoz (Chilean footballer) into Pedro Emiliano Muñoz, with the title "Pedro Muñoz (Chilean footballer)". They are duplicate pages that have been around for years now. Cheers!--Ortizesp (talk) 03:38, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

No, their histories are parallel. You just need to redirect one to the other. GiantSnowman 18:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Date format changes

Hi, I'm confused by your recent edit to William Bronston which changed the date format in the references only. Consistency is only required in the body of the article and I don't believe it's helpful to change the date format for the references away from YYYY-MM-DD without any real reason. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 19:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Which dates remain unchanged in the body? I cannot see anything. The script should change everything. GiantSnowman 19:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
That's my confusion. As far as I'm aware, there's no requirement or need for the date format in the references to be aligned with that in the body. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 19:19, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
It's standard per MOS:DATEFORMAT, certainly a lot more easily readable than YYYY-MM-DD. GiantSnowman 19:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
I do not see that anywhere in the text there, in fact it states that the YYYY-MM-DD date format is perfectly acceptable in the references section. Is there a specific quote or section you could point me towards that says otherwise? Otherwise this undiscussed change only serves to be disruptive. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 19:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Under the 'Formats' section, it details the YYYY-MM-DD format as to be used "Only in limited situations where brevity is helpful", and states "By default, Wikipedia does not abbreviate dates. Use a consistent citation style within any one article." Only very, very limited articles use YYYY-MM-DD, why should this? Accusations of disruption are entirely bad faith and unfounded. GiantSnowman 21:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
To be very clear, I'm not accusing you of being disruptive, I'm describing the undiscussed change as disruptive. The section specifically states that situations where brevity is helpful include tables, infoboxes, [and] references so that's a moot point. No part of the guidelines discourages the use of YYYY-MM-DD dates in the reference section and I disagree with your assertion that YYYY-MM-DD is somehow more difficult to read.
In addition, WP:CITEVAR states that Where Wikipedia does not mandate a specific [date] style, editors should not attempt to convert Wikipedia to their own preferred style, nor should they edit articles for the sole purpose of converting them to their preferred style, or removing examples of, or references to, styles which they dislike. and that ...it is normal practice to defer to the style used by the first major contributor or adopted by the consensus of editors already working on the page, unless a change in consensus has been achieved. ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 22:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
You have not answered my question about why this is needed. GiantSnowman 11:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

ARCA resolved by motion

Hi GiantSnowman,

The ARCA you filed has been resolved by motion as follows:

Remedy 1.2 of the GiantSnowman case ("GiantSnowman admonished and placed under review") is amended to read as follows:

1.2) GiantSnowman is admonished for overuse of the rollback and blocking functions, and reminded to "lead by example" and "strive to model appropriate standards of courtesy"; to "respond promptly and civilly to queries about their Wikipedia-related conduct and administrative actions and to justify them when needed"; to not use admin tools in "cases in which they have been involved" including "conflicts with an editor" and "disputes on topics"; to "treat newcomers with kindness and patience"; and to apply these principles in all interactions with all editors.

With the exception of obvious vandalism or obvious violations of the policy on biographies of living persons:

  • GiantSnowman is prohibited from reverting another editor's contribution without providing an explanation in the edit summary. Default edit summaries provided by MediaWiki or user scripts are not sufficient for the purpose of this restriction. For the avoidance of doubt, use of MediaWiki rollback with an edit summary via a user script such as this one, or via massRollback.js, is permitted.
  • GiantSnowman is prohibited from blocking an editor who has not been recently warned for the conduct in question. For the purposes of this restriction, "recently" is assumed to be within 7 days.

Violations may be reported by any editor to the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard. GiantSnowman may appeal these restrictions directly to the Arbitration Committee at any time.

For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 19:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. GiantSnowman 19:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Youth career

Hello GiantSnowman. On Ethan Mbappé-- I won't change your revert, because it's true that Ethan Mbappé hasn't yet played a match for the youth team in 2024. But when he does, his youth career must be reopened. I understand you may disagree, but for me, the youth career continues until he has played his final youth game. That's how it should be. Just like we don't close the "reserve" career before a player plays his final reserve game. A player can be both a youth player and senior player at the same time, just like a player can be both a reserve and senior player at the same time. Hell, a player could be all three at the same time.
So for now, it's fine. But when (most likely) he goes back to starting and playing with the U19s, I will go back and open his youth career. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your way is too confusing. When do you make the cut off? GiantSnowman 21:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
When the player no longer plays for the youth team and only plays for the senior/reserve team. In cases where you can't find sources about the player's youth career, I understand why you should cut off at the senior debut, but for such a prominent club like PSG, I can find literally every line-up for the under-19s and under-17s if I look hard enough. Also, in France, youth football is only up to age 19, and the cut off-date is the year of birth+19 years. For example, Ethan Mbappé will no longer be able to play youth football at the start of the 2025–26 season, because 2006+19=2025. So that usually also helps for cutting off certain players that make their senior debut at age 18-19 in their final season of youth football eligibility.
I understand why cutting it off at the senior debut date might be easier, but if we're looking for accuracy, we shouldn't just close the youth career when the player is still playing youth football. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Examples: Xavi Simons - he played in the UEFA Youth League for PSG in February 2022, but made his senior debut in February 2021. Kays Ruiz-Atil - he went back to play for the under-19s after having played six months on the senior team. I usually leave invisible comments so people know why the youth career and senior career overlap. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
But players play with youth teams into their 30s - usually for fitness or discipline reasons! GiantSnowman 18:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Well, training and being a part of a team is different, right? Players older than the age limit cannot play youth football in France, at least. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Overage players can play in certain competitions, not just train. What about if he doesn't play for the youth team for 2 years? GiantSnowman 21:56, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
I guess it would be country-by-country, then. I can only speak for France, and in France, youth football is age-restricted. We also don't have under-23 leagues. I'm not sure about what you mean by the 2 year thing. Paul Vaurie (talk) 02:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
If he doesn't play for the youth team again until 2026, are you going to have an infobox like (for example):
{{Infobox football biography
|youthyears1 = 2017–2023
|youthclubs1 = Paris Saint-Germain
|youthyears2 = 2026–
|youthclubs2 = Paris Saint-Germain
|years1 = 2023–2026
|clubs1 = Paris Saint-Germain
|caps1 = 15
|goals1 = 0
}} GiantSnowman 18:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Giantsnowman, you've just demonstrated not only your lack of ability to listen, but also your lack of knowledge about French football. Ethan Mbappé will not be allowed to play with youth teams after 30 June 2025. Per WP:CIR I kindly advise you to understand your own abilities and competencies, and avoid editing in this area. Frenchl (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2024)

An antacid is a substance which neutralizes stomach acidity and is used to relieve heartburn, indigestion or an upset stomach.
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Antacid

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Fish slice • Carbon source (biology)

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Henri Dirickx

If two surnames are used for one person in the references, it is good to mention such fact. Xx236 (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying - we usually say 'also spelt XXX' or similar. GiantSnowman 18:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Adamawa United F.C. players

A tag has been placed on Category:Adamawa United F.C. players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Issue with editor

SniperLight47 is now inexplicably reverting edits I have made to my own User Page. This is becoming an issue. Anwegmann (talk) 21:39, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for 72 hours. GiantSnowman 18:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate your help. Anwegmann (talk) 19:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Shovel

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Antacid • Fish slice

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

SniperLight47 sockpuppeting

Just a heads up, User:SniperLight47 is now sockpuppeting as User:SniperLight46. Anwegmann (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

I can't block socks - please can you report at WP:SPI? GiantSnowman 19:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

User:AdityaSty90

And do keep in mind the insults they have been directing towards others in their talkpage! The one in Indonesian reads roughly "Thanks for the suggestions and guidelines, i hope they are useful and that i am able to edit according to policies and specific instructions", but the one directed to you on 10 January (in "English") is dead serious.

Attentively --RevampedEditor (talk) 16:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. GiantSnowman 19:15, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Pages to be moved

Hello (after some time) :). I was not so active here in the last period, but now I'm back and I want to clear up some things. I saw that you expressed your opinion on my proposal to move Mostiștea Ulmu page. I proposed other pages also to be moved and I'll appreciate if you will express your opinion about them, as well. These are the pages:

Stadionul Parc (Breaza)
AS Hușana Huși
AS Cimentul Fieni
Stadionul Cimentul
CSA Aurul Brad

Thnak you! Rhinen talk 09:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Will do! GiantSnowman 09:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! I have two more, I hope that these will be the last for a while
CS Avântul Valea Mărului
ACS Recaș Rhinen (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
OK, great. GiantSnowman 13:34, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of association football players who died during their careers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of association football players who died during their careers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of association footballers who died during their careers. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Joseph Ochaya

Can you restore my edit? It was good - I put in the third goal to statistics and you took it out.Wolfgang (talk) 14:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to re-add it yourself, but do not change the overall stats as your edit was incorrect. GiantSnowman 19:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Graeme Shinnie

Hi mate, the game he played on 19th was a cup game so corrected your edit. ParkingTheBus (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Lovely, thank you, sorry! GiantSnowman 19:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Esteban Solari

Content (about his fellow compatriot/manager) removed again, now this nuisance has created an account to continue vandalising!

Attentively, have a nice (next) week RevampedEditor (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Revert, warn, report at WP:AIV, as usual. GiantSnowman 18:08, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Created on 26August 2021 in fact[1] in case you have not yet looked at the contributions page. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2024)

Visualization of one newton of force
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Newton (unit)

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Shovel • Antacid

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Jasin Assehnoun

Hey, I was wondering about the edit you reverted in Jasin Assehnoun article. He is half Finnish and half Moroccan, considered to be Finnish and Moroccan 50/50 "equally", so why those categories don't apply? Syvä-äksy (talk) 19:02, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Just because he is a footballer who holds Moroccan citizenship (through descent) does not mean that he is a 'Moroccan footballer'. GiantSnowman 19:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Paul Onuachu

Hi. I’ve no intention of reverting you (I have far too much respect for your experience) but can you explain why you consider that Soccerway is a better source than Soccerbase. I find Soccerway very difficult to interpret, with far too many (unexplained) symbols. I’d be interested in your explanation. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Soccerbase is only really useful, in my experience, for English & Scottish league players - although I agree Soccerway is overly complicated! GiantSnowman 19:09, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Ok - that’s fine Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 19:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Vulgar vandalism

Already logged off and now am going to bed, but before i do so this: I see you have already warned this "user" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:UltramanZeroAwokkkk#February_2023), have a look at what they did at Natxo Insa; following a (supposedly) bad performance for Malaysia, this "person" went on a rampage of despicable insults towards the player.

Vandalism was so much and of so much "quality" the patrollers forgot to fix vandalism in the subject's full name, i took care of that even though i know i'll be accused of vandalism in edit summary notes in spite of doing the exact opposite :(

Attentively, enjoy the rest of your evening 2001:8A0:765C:E100:EC25:510:13AD:99E8 (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

I have given them a final warning. GiantSnowman 19:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Amos Nondi

@GiantSnowman:, You protected Amos Nondi from page creation 7 years ago but his career has progressed a lot since then and I created Draft:Amos Nondi (2), woudl you be able to unprotect Amos Nondi from creation and/or move my draft to mainspace? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 09:47, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done - in future, please do not create 'rival' drafts to existing drafts, instead edit and improve the existing draft. GiantSnowman 17:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

What you left on my talk page,

@GiantSnowman, as per Wikipedia:Do not bite the newcomers, to avoid being a "biter" to newcomers, rather than deleting in the form of reverting an incorrect edit from someone inexperienced, you should attempt to rectify any errors. In my opinion you didn't follow this guideline when you reverted my edit on Connor Parsons and then rather bluntly threatened me with a ban on my talk page and I don't feel this is fair. I understand you're infinitely more experienced on matters such as these so correct me (nicely this time..?) if I have made any errors in my reasoning but due to my edits being mostly spelling corrections on low-traction pages, I am - to any significant contributions on the site - a newcomer and thus should likely be treated as described on the guideline previously linked. Please get back to me on this :)

SPAG checker (talk) 22:59, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

You have been left numerous messages about your conduct, which has continued with the same issues arising, and so the warning messages have escalated per WP:WARN. GiantSnowman 23:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
So WP:WARN is clearly specified to override Wikipedia:Do not bite the newcomers? Plus, out of context it sounds bad and yet these are trivial errors by a newcomer and thus I'd personally appreciate I wasn't threatened with retrospective punishment as you did. Your reply has hardly been satisfactory considering you haven't addressed why you ignored the guideline I linked? If you explained another one of Wikipedia's mounds of obscure guidelines in that such and such rule does not apply in such and such situation, I accept that but as far as I can see you still haven't followed WP:Do not bite the newcomers. I respect you as an admin but I still don't think this is fair and I do feel a little warded off by all of this which is what the guideline I linked was specifically meant to reduce the occurence of... Oh, and you still haven't clarified why you reverted the edit rather than correcting it, another possible non-abidence of WP:Do not bite the newcomers...
SPAG checker (talk) 23:23, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
(by talk reader) I'm disappointed that you've taken this approach, SPAG. The messages left on your user talk pages are boilerplate agreed by the editing community in our user warning templates. If those boilerplate messages angered you then I'm afraid you won't make it here on Wikipedia. Wikipedia encounters a lot of ne'er-do-wells and our user warning templates are one-size-fits-all so they have to address the bad faith vandals just the same as the shrinking violet crybullies. I think had you approached with humility you would take those messages onboard, rather than foolishly try to reproach GiantSnowman, who is far kinder than I am. So you see, sticking to boilerplate is meant to protect you, the new user, from personally written messages like this. With that appreciation please see that your bad behavior triggers warnings and if you don't want warnings (or worse) just stop making problematic edits. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
To be fair, the warnings were because of forgetting to add a source (and separated by several months), it wasn't really a behavior issue that began this. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 00:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
@Chaotic Enby: Yes, I didn't bother looking at the edits in question as it seems laughable a new editor thinks an admin should just clean up the mess left behind rather than revert and issue a warning. What drew my attention was the attempted tone policing on this talk page (SPAG accusing GiantSnowman of biting newcomers). Chris Troutman (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Again, there might be a misunderstanding going on. It doesn't look like the user was asking the admin to clean up any mess, but just questioning why a level-3 escalating warning was given despite only one warning having been given months before. The issue is not really that an admin reverted and warned, but that the warning chosen was unnecessarily threatening. ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 00:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I don't think we misunderstand. SPAG added content without a source and got a level 2 warning. 65 days later it was the same problem and got a level 3 warning. I don't agree that GiantSnowman unreasonably escalated the situation or was unkind. If this was an IP we could argue this wasn't necessarily the same editor. This is a registered user, it was the same problem of not adding a citation, and it was a boilerplate warning. And this un-accomplished Wikipedian with less than three hundred edits complains that they've been bitten? Ludricrous. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I'd say calling someone "unaccomplished" and bringing up edit count isn't the best way to go at it, especially since WP:BITE is specifically about how to behave with newer editors. It's "don't bite the newbies", not "don't bite the accomplished Wikipedians". ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 01:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I spend far too much of my time cleaning ups after 'newbies' (their account is over 2 years old, they have over 200 edits) who cannot comply with the basic requirements of editing. GiantSnowman 12:50, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, I understand how it can get pretty tiring in the long run. Good luck! ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 12:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
As far as I can see, forgetting to add a source is a trivial matter. It is not "bad behaviour", honestly it's outrageous you would even suggest that, and it is not necessarily a "problematic edit", especially given these are two warnings - from the same moderator - from trivial isolated incidents months apart, and *especially* given I am considered in most regards a newcomer as you yourself admitted. You, just like GiantSnowman himself, haven't addressed him not following the guidelines of WP:Do not bite the newcomers in that he reverted my edit rather than correcting it, and in terms of non-"boilerplate" responses, doubling down on his impoliteness towards me. Maybe I'm far from perfect in my handling of this situation but I feel you have been even less so.
SPAG checker (talk) 00:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
No, it's not trivial, editors are regularly and routinely blocked for it. WP:RS and WP:V and WP:BLP all apply as you have already been told. GiantSnowman 12:52, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2024)

Mahatma Gandhi with a young Indira Ghandi, during his fast in 1924
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Hunger strike

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Newton (unit) • Shovel

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Proposed deletion of Charles Wood (footballer)

Notice

The article Charles Wood (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already a disambig for Charles Wood, there seem to be no pages linking to "Charles Wood (footballer)", and the page to which this currently directs - Charlie Wood (footballer) - seems to be for someone to whom literally nobody ever refers as Charles Wood, so there is no risk of wrongful searching. If this is not a disambig category I do not see why there needs to be a redirect to a footballer who has never played in the top 120 clubs in England, especially as other Charles Woods are far more prominent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Am proposing a deletion of Charles Wood (footballer) - it seems to be a redirect of no use, and redirects to the less prominent Charles Wood (footballer). 

In Vitrio (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
OK - duly put it in Nominating Charles Wood (footballer) . Not done one of those before! In Vitrio (talk) 20:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
You do know that the target of the redirect was changed before your nomination, and therefore our nomination is incorrect, misleading, and pointless? GiantSnowman 22:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Wood (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Wood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

NFOOTY

Hey there. I am here just for clearing a doubt. Why did we redirect NFOOTY to WP:SPORTCRIT? Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 13:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

See WP:NSPORTS2022. GiantSnowman 18:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).

CheckUser changes

removed Wugapodes

Interface administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.

Technical news

  • Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
  • Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Please see this (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Fortes_(footballer,_born_1994)&diff=prev&oldid=1202798598). Transfer added without a source, i reverted citing precisely that reason, was immediately reverted, AGAIN with no source! I profit from the occasion to comment that i see you have already warned this user.

Speaking of "user", due to their main interest (Indonesian football, following a quick glance at the history of contributions) i'm almost 100% sure this is a sock of User:Dwinug.

P.S. I have already reverted again in Mr. Fortes, would not be the least surprised if the other person had done the same to me. Attentively RevampedEditor (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Please use WP:SPI. GiantSnowman 16:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Done! Don't know if i did it in the right place, this was why i came to you; sorry to bother you, apparently! Regarding the player's transfer, it seems to be correct, i grew tired of the other nuisance and sourced the page myself. --RevampedEditor (talk) 16:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

You need to create a subpage, see the section/box headed 'How to open an investigation'. GiantSnowman 16:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing GiantSnowman a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:48, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your reversion of my insertion of bad grammar at WP:BLP

That's fine. I know the subjunctive mood is archaic, pretentious and terrible.

My bad edit can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&diff=prev&oldid=1203307604 123957a (talk) 17:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Your change to the grammar makes no sense. GiantSnowman 17:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Or, should I say more accurately, less sense than the stable version. GiantSnowman 17:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
I thought it meant the same thing... whatever. I will NEVER edit policy pages again if that's what is required from me to be a good editor! 123957a (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
We're not saying that. People are encouraged to WP:BEBOLD and make changes that might need changing - the issue was your the restoration, which was the disruptive element, not the original edit! GiantSnowman 17:35, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, I know not to edit war... I was just trying to accomplish something big and get attention. 123957a (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
By that, I mean making a big improvement, not edit warring! 123957a (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
but a minor change to grammar is not a "big improvement". GiantSnowman 18:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman If you must gain consensus on the talk page before any edit goes through, they should just full-protect the page instead of semi-protecting it, to reduce disruption and save editors' time. 123957a (talk) 18:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Again, that is not what I said. Respectfully, the more you post here, the more I have concerns about your competence and understanding. GiantSnowman 18:23, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman: User:Valjean told me I need to get consensus on the talk page first. 123957a (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
No, I didn't say that. You are really wasting our time. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
I am not Valjean. GiantSnowman 18:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman: I know you and Valjean were saying the same thing: both condemned my behavior because it was out of line with WP:BRD. 123957a (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
And now we're condemning your behaviour because you are being disruptive and potentially trolling, referring to your 'bad edit' and repeatedly saying that it is " archaic, pretentious and terrible". Stop posting here and find something else to do. GiantSnowman 21:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
@GiantSnowman,
Valjean called it 'bad grammar' and I've heard people criticize the subjunctive as outdated/archaic.
I don't care whether it's used or not, and I'll stop wasting everyone's time on this. Let's move on. 123957a (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, I made a mistake in my above comment. I actually meant to say "GiantSnowman told me I need to get consensus on the talk page first.", see this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&diff=prev&oldid=1203324223 123957a (talk) 14:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
That is not what I said. I said you should get consensus given your initial edit was reverted. GiantSnowman 19:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2024)

Various pâtés
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Pâté

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Hunger strike • Newton (unit)

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Concern regarding Draft:Fiachra Pagel

Information icon Hello, GiantSnowman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiachra Pagel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Script changing dates in citations

Hello, GinatSnowman. I noticed you were using a script to standardize dates in the Month day, Year format, which is great. However, you have left your script with the option turned on to also do that within citations. May I suggest turning it off? MOS:NUM subentry MOS:DATE specifically calls out citations as having different rules. That references WP:CITESTYLE, which specifically allows the other formats, but recommends consistency within an article.

The article where I noticed your efforts already was already consistent in date citations, using YYYY-MM-DD style, which is also the style that the automatic citation maker uses. The latter is probably going to make that format de facto standard over time, and using the script to make the changes is likely to lead to inconsistencies (as other edtors add automated citations). In any event, please consider turning off the citation change option in the script, and continuing to use it in article text. Dovid (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

It is not my script, and in any event I see no benefit to having the references in a different format to the rest of the article. GiantSnowman 21:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Barry John

On 7 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barry John, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)


Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Grateful, thank you! GiantSnowman 09:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Jordan Hunter (footballer)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jordan Hunter (footballer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2024)

Uncooked rigatoni
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Rigatoni

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Pâté • Hunger strike

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Foreign policy

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Rigatoni • Pâté

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 February 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Nomination of Randy Padilla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randy Padilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Padilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:57, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Economy of South America

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Foreign policy • Rigatoni

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Editaversary

Sdkb talk 01:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! GiantSnowman 19:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Thank you! GiantSnowman 19:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of John Murphy (1900s footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Murphy (1900s footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Murphy (1900s footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

* Pppery * it has begun... 21:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belizean expatriates in Guatemala

A tag has been placed on Category:Belizean expatriates in Guatemala indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:21, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Community service

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Economy of South America • Foreign policy

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Guinean tailors

A tag has been placed on Category:Guinean tailors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 01:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Religious music

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Community service • Economy of South America

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian tailors

A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian tailors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Jimmy Husband

Hi. Not sure why you have removed info on Jimmy Husband sourced and ref'd from the obit on the Everton FC website - reason wasn't given in your edit summary. Could you clarify for me? Ta. 09:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC) Cripesohblimey (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Because the level of detail is not needed, and some content is unsourced. GiantSnowman 20:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
I would contend that being part of a team that finishes second in Division Two is worth noting. It is in the obituary - perhaps I didn't specifically add a cite tag at the end of the sentence. Cripesohblimey (talk) 10:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Feel free to re-add if properly sourced. GiantSnowman 09:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Stafford County F.C.

Hello, I noticed you had a query about The Combination and notability, in particular with FA Cup entries, and it was pointed out Stafford County never entered; I've done a short page about them (they don't really need any more, frankly) and it seems to have been a deliberate decision NOT to enter the competition, being a sort of Stoke-based Corinthian. Although curiously they joined The Combination, seemingly apropos of nothing. Maybe they couldn't get fixtures any other way. But it does support the clubs in that particular emanation of The Combination as being "notable" as every other club had a tilt at the Cup. In Vitrio (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Interesting, thanks! GiantSnowman 20:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Chiedozie Ogbene

I didn't mess with the infobox aside from updating it in visual editor mode. I didn't touch the spacing and I don't know why it does that. I guess infobox shouldn't be updated in visual editor mode.

Froglife94 (talk) 01:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

That revert was inappropriate. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I was restoring established formatting. GiantSnowman 20:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You reverted a constructive change because you didn't like whitespace changes which were caused by Wikipedia's visual editor and obviously weren't intentionally made. That's disruptive and WP:POINTy. Robby.is.on (talk) 00:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
No, it wasn't - the pure revert was so Froglife got a notification (it worked!) and then I immediately restored the constructive element. GiantSnowman 08:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Ariel Ngueukam

Please update his article to his new team since it’s been officially announced that he transferred team.

Source: https://www.unitedcityfootballclub.com/news/ 120.28.249.38 (talk) 01:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done GiantSnowman 09:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

"Clinistrip" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Clinistrip has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 21 § Clinistrip until a consensus is reached. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Oscar Dorley

My edit was not vandalism. Yesterday Liberia played a match and Dorley scored a goal. Why didn't you check this before you deleted my edit? Refrain from judging others too easily. Wolfgang (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

As per my edit summary - I checked a source, and even if a recent game/goal was missing, your edit was wrong. GiantSnowman 18:14, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Officiousness is worse than fascism. Wolfgang (talk) 21:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Are you calling me a fascist?! WP:NPA. GiantSnowman 13:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

General apology for moving forward

Hello GiantSnowman. We've interacted with each other on Wikipedia for quite some time now, almost four years. Just wanted to say that I still really respect your work here, and additionally, sorry for my aggressive language on Talk:Ethan Mbappé, I should have been more respectful at times. I just felt really strongly about my opinion on this issue. Moving forward hopefully we can collaborate more and work together more succesfully! Apologies once again, Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:42, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

No apology needed (from either party) - yes we both have strong views but it's been a productive discussion and I certainly have no ill feelings or similar! Looking forward to working together again in the future. GiantSnowman 08:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Check before undo

Please double check before you make an incorrect edit like you did on Theo Vassell. You tagged it as poor grammar when the grammar was fine and your edit was actually the poor grammar. User:Jordca97. 16:34, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

"Two edits in playoffs" is not good grammar. GiantSnowman 16:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2024)

File:Bucaram foto.png
Abdalá Bucaram
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Abdalá Bucaram

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Natural resource • Religious music

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

FIFA Arab Cup naming

I just thought about it, can you explain why are main title of La Liga or Ligue 1 articles not presented with their partner, EA Sports and Uber Eats while this applies for Arab Cup and FIFA ? Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

We do not use sponsored names. GiantSnowman 08:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
FIFA is also a sponsor since it is a foreign entity to the UAFA. Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No, it is not. GiantSnowman 13:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Are not FIFA and UAFA independant of each other ? Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No, claiming that FIFA'a involvement makes them a 'sponsor'. If that is the limit of your argument, then no wonder consensus is against you. GiantSnowman 13:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Consensus is against me because Hashim-afc has 15000 edits. To my mind that's defined as a sponsor because FIFA is not a creator of this competition and it's not affiliated to founders. Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
That is not the reason why consensus is against you. GiantSnowman 14:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no other reason, on all editions there is one partnership with FIFA, this is not relevant to rename Arab Cup to FIFA Arab Cup. It's like renaming Ligue 1 to Ligue 1 Uber Eats. Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
No, it's not the same at all, as I and others at the article talk page have explained. GiantSnowman 15:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Okay, was 1963 Arab Cup (first édition of FIFA Arab Cup) in partnership with FIFA ? Do you see the nonsense ? Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 15:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
We use the current name of the competition for the main article, and the contemporary name for individual tournament articles. This has already been explained to you (using the AFCON example) - why don't you understand that? GiantSnowman 15:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
The comparison is irrelevant because the competition and the association which organizes it, have been affiliated with FIFA therefore recognized de facto since the beginning. Wokemanwhowalks (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Please ask yourself why nobody agrees with you. This conversation is over, thanks. GiantSnowman 15:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Billy Kellock (footballer, born 1954)

On 27 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Billy Kellock (footballer, born 1954), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 07:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 14, 2024)

Gabin in The Little Rebels (1955)
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Jean Gabin

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Abdalá Bucaram • Natural resource

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Death of Martin Herbster

Does this prove the death of Martin Herbster (sorry it's in German) : https://bnn.de/karlsruhe/karlsruher-norden/graben-neudorf/herausragende-persoenlichkeit-graben-neudorf-trauert-um-seinen-ringer-helden-martin-herbster Badische Neue Nachrichten are usually a reliable source.

Another link: https://nbrv.de/index.php?view=article&id=129:martin-herbster-ist-verstorben&catid=10:news I see this a less reliable source though. Bdschi (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

@Bdschi: BNN is absolutely fine. Most of the article is paywalled and I cannot access it – does it mention the exact date of death? The article is from 8 March and in your change which GiantSnowman reverted you gave 2 March as the date of death. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:23, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Agree with Robby - BNN is fine to verify that he has died, the issue is that you did not include it in your edit (along with a number of other articles about people you claim recently died). GiantSnowman 18:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
@Bdschi: I saw you updated the article using the BNN article. I checked the article, it does not mention a specific date, only states "Nun ist Herbster nach schwerer Krankheit im Alter von 62 Jahren verstorben" ("Herbster has now passed away after a serious illness at the age of 62"), so I've removed the exact date for now. Robby.is.on (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Imre Kiss

Hi.
Thank you for clarification. On a web I have found this and this. I found that on French Wiki about him under Liens externes. Laslovarga (talk) 00:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Fbref might be OK - FootballDatabase is not considered reliable as it is user-generated. GiantSnowman 09:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Hmm

Hey GS, do these edits look familiar to you? I'm a bit suspicious of their newness, so to speak, but I'm also interested in moving Draft:Suriname Major League 2024 out of draft space--it's a pretty big thing for a small country. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

  • I moved it and added one source--you're the expert, and I hope you can help bring it into shape! Drmies (talk) 15:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
    Doesn't immediately ring any bells I'm afraid - will look at the article now. GiantSnowman 10:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

An observation

Hi GS. I realise that non-constructive editing can be really frustrating for veteran editors. But in my experience, for achieving the desired result – better editing – educating other editors is more effective than shaming them ([2], [3]). Robby.is.on (talk) 18:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I just found [4]. That's good! Robby.is.on (talk) 18:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
And this and this and this etc. GiantSnowman 19:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you so much for reverting the harmful edits! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Happy to help! GiantSnowman 21:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Andersen

I know it's really annoying when people say "you missed a bit" when you are cleaning up, but I think perhaps you did. (This assumes I have understood what is going on here,which I so often do not ...) Cheers DBaK (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Now sorted by Daniel Case, so no worries. Sorry to bother you. Cheers DBaK (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
No worries - and if I do miss a bit, I don't mind people letting me know at all! GiantSnowman 09:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Good to know. Cheers DBaK (talk) 11:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2024)

Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Antarctic

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Fire safety • Jean Gabin

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Ryan Flynn (footballer)

Hi mate, please can you help me out? I'm struggling to get the stats table to align for Ryan Flynn. The St Mirren total is over one column and I cannot get it right for some reason. Thanks IJA (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done GiantSnowman 17:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Girabola seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CAF.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Who is your football team?

You know, I don't think I even know who you support! I was curious, who do you support? Govvy (talk) 11:38, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Bradford City! GiantSnowman 11:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
You seem to having a good run of form end of the season. Do you go to most of the games then? Govvy (talk) 13:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
I have a season ticket and go to most (home) games when I can! GiantSnowman 14:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 17, 2024)

Full rack of fifteen balls, ready for the break shot
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Pool (cue sports)

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Antarctic • Fire safety

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Viktor Gyökeres

Hi, I was checking the page history of Viktor Gyökeres just now and seen this edit. I then checked User talk:2A0B:6204:1B05:CD00:222D:9ACD:90C1:7923 and seen you've twinkled a warning, which I am confident that has gone to the wrong page. Not entirely sure if the anonymous person who reverted a previous edit back to the original version has noticed this. But at least the article is always what it should be. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

I think you're right, thanks for the heads up! GiantSnowman 17:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

hi

Hey @GiantSnowman I'm Omar, a journalist. I have a question, for you. Would you mind creating a page, for this individual? They've been featured in newspapers and news sources. Thank you much! You can review details by checking out this link and My sandbox Omarjournalist (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm not clicking that link, and your sandbox subject appears non-notable. I suggest you use WP:AFC. GiantSnowman 12:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi @GiantSnowman i cant add more sources you can see the news about this person via google
he has more 20 sources in many languages Omarjournalist (talk) 13:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
It's a person called 'Ali' - such a common name! GiantSnowman 13:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
if you click to the link above you can see the full name with sources Omarjournalist (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I am not clicking your link. I do not trust it (or you). GiantSnowman 13:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
ok i have an idea check this article please https://www.aa.com.tr/en/culture/young-syrian-promotes-turkish-tv-series-stronger-ties-with-arab-world/1998300 from Anadolu Agency after this In labor of love you can see the full name of this person and you can search on google with his name + last name Al Suleiman Omarjournalist (talk) 13:11, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I have already suggested that you please use WP:AFC. Please do not post here any further. GiantSnowman 13:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes just can do favor for me i have problems i cant create this article can you create the draft for me in the name and i will add sources please and send this to review with many thanks Omarjournalist (talk) 13:14, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop emailing me, please stop posting here, and please stop posting on other people's talk pages as you have done at the talk pages of @Silver seren and Tom Radulovich:. If you want to create an article, then use WP:AFC, the instructions there are clear. GiantSnowman 13:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks a lot sorry Omarjournalist (talk) 13:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Blocked sock. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
OK, thanks, I definitely thought something not 100% right! GiantSnowman 13:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike de Geer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike de Geer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike de Geer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlakeIsHereStudios (talk | contributions) 12:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

ZeroZero

Hi GS. Do you happen to know a previous discussion of ZeroZero that would indicate some sort of consensus, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football, WP:RS/N or elsewhere? I'd like to add it to WP:WPFLINKSNO. Robby.is.on (talk) 22:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

The best I can easily find is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 157#reliable sources... GiantSnowman 17:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. :-) I see @S.A. Julio: has done a great job at WP:WPFLINKSNO. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes, fully agreed! GiantSnowman 17:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 18, 2024)

A crewed submersible used for underwater exploration
Hello, GiantSnowman. The article for improvement of the week is:

Exploration

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Pool (cue sports) • Antarctic

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

readded Nyttend
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

readded Joe Roe

Oversight changes

removed GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GiantSnowman/2024&oldid=1221910430"