User talk:GamerHashaam

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 08:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 08:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what do you want from me? GamerHashaam (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a mandatory alert. El_C 02:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aspersions[edit]

WP:Aspersions of this kind are prohibited on Wikipedia, especially in Contentious Topics (see above).

RegentsPark, perhaps you can reinforce this message? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The timeline previously existing on this page is rock solid. You can debate for months and you won't get anywhere. You will be simply wasting our time. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)" GamerHashaam (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found this while reading the edits on the kashmir page and then reading the article page and this is from the dating subject GamerHashaam (talk) 08:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cham Muslim Genocide (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Cambodian genocide. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is a pretty long section in Cambodian genocide#Cham Muslims. It definitely needs some editing work. If you want to create a WP:SPLIT of that section, this article should come after copyediting that section and this article might better called something like Persecution of Cham Muslims during the Cambodian genocide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cham Muslim Genocide and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain a bit please GamerHashaam (talk) 16:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GamerHashaam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2024 Azad Kashmir demonstrations, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made that page and I have provided the sources in the references section , I suggest you give it a look like reading them as It states some 70+ injured policemen and hundreds of protestors arrested 10 may to 11 may GamerHashaam (talk) 10:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn’t cite any references in the casualties box. You simply just stated “per Pakistani media” and “per local sources” without specifying any sources. You have to use citations.

Being the creator of a page does not mean the page belongs to you nor does it give you any sort of privileges. You have to discuss changes in the talk page regardless if disagreements arise. VirtualVagabond (talk) 12:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve also cited the killed policeman and the three killed protestors for you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 12:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Its reported 4 in some newspapers and wiki allows all sides to tell there story rather then be biased towards one thus I added the local reports from the DHQ that estimates at 13-15 protestors shot dead by rangers with hundred injured GamerHashaam (talk) 07:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Third Balochistan conflict[edit]

I've seen that you've added lot of info on the subject but you haven't added citations. Add citations for it to be reliable. Waleed (talk) 03:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did add a citation but apparently Its not working, I am new to wiki editing can you fix the citation please GamerHashaam (talk) 08:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Give source I'll add Waleed (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Third Balochistan conflict, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 (2)[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Third Balochistan conflict. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 21:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide references and sources before pilling a state promoted narrative into a Independent Information website. None wants your bullshit from GHQ Rawalpindi given to you by Colonel Mushtaq Ahmed Junejo. Captain Anwar go mind your military bussiness GamerHashaam (talk) 22:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No clue who they are, im simply reverting. Please keep a cool mind and use the talk page. VirtualVagabond (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

then provide a citation or source before reverting GamerHashaam (talk) 22:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 (3)[edit]

Your recent editing history at Third Balochistan conflict shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VirtualVagabond (talk) 22:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Currently you have started a editor war by reverting my edit constantly without providing any source or other citation for a pakistani victory. GamerHashaam (talk) 22:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VirtualVagabond (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 (4)[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors. 48JCL (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alert concerning Wikipedia:Contentious topics/India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan[edit]

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. El_C 02:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Third Balochistan conflict, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abolition and Baloch. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]