User talk:Galdjie

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from David Nahai, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.

Even though you did not create this article, your edits suggest that this account is operating in concert with Boder111 (talk · contribs). Accordingly, you have both been warned for your conduct on this article. —C.Fred (talk) 05:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to David Nahai. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 05:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to contest the speedy deletion, you may add the {{hangon}} template to the article and explain on the talk page how the subject is notable, but you may not remove the speedy delete tag. —C.Fred (talk) 05:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply on the talk page. I'm not convinced that being the head of LADWP makes Nahai notable. Either show that he is a notable person or supply additional secondary reliable sources. If there's an assertion of significance or importance made, then I'll remove the tag. —C.Fred (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nahai.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Nahai.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Katsav.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Katsav.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]