User talk:GPReddy360

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RULES TO TALK. Please see this before sending messages. Or such thing (message sent) if unfair to me will not be recorded until I approved.[edit]

  • Read any one box and ask or talk me for any questions.
  • No false message is accepted else I will not respond to your comment.
  • Please be alert on what you are talking on; additional evidence is compulsorily required before inquiry or edit faiths.
  • No personal questions.
  • If I can't help you in what you want, go to Wikipedia:Teahouse for this or administrators if well contacted.

For mobile users only[edit]

  • Assume good faiths and click "add discussion" in your mobile version.

Thanking You,
(info.ask.d-contributes)
GPReddy360
User


Please use below this line ||

                          \/

Blocked[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GPReddy360 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Who is @NS Dibyojyoti:? How can I be blocked. I didn't done nothing. I came 5 days. As stated in my rules. Without additional evidence, you can't proved me to be blocked. Please don't do this work. I don't know him. How can you be so sure. In his SPI only one user @DRCNSINDIA:, I saw, is blocked for abuses. But I have no contact with him either NS Dibyojyoti nor DRCNSINDIA.(info.ask.d-contributes) 09:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 12:16, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GPReddy360 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please see the WP:SPI of User:NS Dibyojyoti, and see only one sock account User:DRCNSINDIA is blocked indefinitely I saw. My name is not mentioned on there. Please note it and review again. (info.ask.d-contributes) 12:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Entirely unambiguous. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 16:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{help me}} please review my block. (info.ask.d-contributes) 15:18, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. Please be patient. PhilKnight (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GPReddy360 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Refer Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NS Dibyojyoti/Archive before giving reason. My name is not there. Review again please.User-GPReddy360.Sign.jpg(info.ask.d-contributes) 05:51, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your name doesn't have to be there. This is a checkuser block, meaning that a connection to the other account is not in doubt, as you have been told twice. Since these requests are repetitive, I am declining this request and removing talk page access to prevent further time wasting for everyone. You may use WP:UTRS for further appeals, but if they are unchanged from the ones here, you will lose access to that as well. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{help me}}Review again. Show prove so that I can be satisfied. Without prove, giving one sentence reason is not enough to counter a person. Try to understand and review carefuly.(info.ask.d-contributes) 05:57, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have an active unblock request, so using the help templates is entirely useless. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 09:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]