User talk:FutureTeacher2026
| This user is a student editor in Augustana_University/HIST_121_-_U.S._History_since_1877_(Spring_2023) . |
Welcome![edit]
Hello, FutureTeacher2026, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
Debbie Schneider (9to5) moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Debbie Schneider (9to5), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 20:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Debbie Schneider article[edit]
Hi @FutureTeacher2026, Hkrage22:
I checked out your draft on Debbie Schneider and I think you have a solid draft but you need more citations to reliable sources. Keep in mind, reliable sources are secondary, independent and have a history of fact checking like news articles or academic journals. Debbie was a part of the 9to5 group. Perhaps there are some labor studies journals that might've covered her? You could check the sources on the 9to5 wiki article to see if they have any relevant info on Debbie.
Also that second paragraph titled "9to5 organization" seems unnecessary, since you go on to explain Debbie's involvement in that organization further down.
Those are some suggestions to improve the article. Until you've added additional reliable sources, please do not move the article into mainspace. Let me know when you've made the improvements, and I'll help you with next steps. Feel free to reach out for any questions. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the suggestions. Two questions.
- Debbie Schneider is a really hard person to find articles on. How do I find sources that meet Wiki requirements if there aren’t many that mention her?
- Also, how do I find my draft space?
- Thanks FutureTeacher2026 (talk) 23:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @FutureTeacher2026 You can find the draft at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Debbie_Schneider_(9to5)
- Like I mentioned above, you're looking for: "news articles or academic journals. Debbie was a part of the 9to5 group. Perhaps there are some labor studies journals that might've covered her? You could check the sources on the 9to5 wiki article to see if they have any relevant info on Debbie." Also your campus library has access to academic journal, newspaper subscriptions that might have info on Debbie. I'd say to reach out to your campus librarian, and they can probably help point you in the right direction of journals, books or databases that might have info on her. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Premature publish[edit]
Hi, I've just come across your article Debbie Schneider (which, as you can see, I've moved to a more appropriate title), and unfortunately the sources cited are not sufficient to show that the person is notable. This was declined at the AfC review, and you should have resubmitted it for another review after addressing the decline reasons, but instead you went ahead and published it. This is unfortunate, because it has already been moved back to drafts once, meaning it shouldn't be moved again, which then leaves deletion as the only other option. That is obviously in nobody's interests. Therefore I would like to ask that you either move it back to drafts yourself, giving you an opportunity to work on it in peace, or alternatively come up with better sources (and also more citations, as the contents are quite sparsely referenced at the moment) pretty quickly before someone starts the deletion discussion. Any questions or comments, ping me. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Debbie Schneider for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debbie Schneider until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.