Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transfix (band) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transfix (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transfix (band)[edit]

Hello Formzed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Transfix (band)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Transfix (band)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trans FX (band) (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and discogs are (generally) not considered reliable sources. Please also note that external links are not allowed within the main body section of a draft/article (however are within an 'external links' style section).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trans FX (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Formzed, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trans FX (band) (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jmcgnh was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm reviewing this submission with the notability criteria for music in mind.

As I see it, the press coverage of this band is somewhat below the normal standard for notability. We can't use: interviews, brief mentions, announcements, sales listings or press releases for purposes of notability. Perhaps more in-depth coverage exists, but the current references don't seem to be sufficient. The Kelton Sears Seattle Weekly review is possibly the highest profile, but it's an extremely short bit of coverage.

As best I can tell, the band has one release with K records, the only label here to meet WP:NMUSIC#C5. But C5 requires two or more releases with such a label.

I don't see that any of the other criteria can rescue the situation.

=

With respect to verifiability, there are large chunks of prose with no apparent sourcing. In the places where there do seem to be inline refs, checking them seemed, as often as not, to get to something that identifies the same subject as being written about, but not to supply the apparent wealth of detail that has been written. One example: the Jes Skolnik coverage of the music video for Into the Blu. Where is this information coming from? There are many sources listed that could be general references for this information, but many of them would fall to challenges as not reliable sources.

=

The overall tone of the article seems more appropriate to a fan-blog writeup than an encyclopedia article. I don't see it as quite so blatantly promotional that it would be immediately subject to deletion, but there would be a long way to go to get to WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trans FX (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trans FX (band) has been accepted[edit]

Trans FX (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 05:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Formzed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]