User talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 15

Blendoku review

Hi, the paged is based the page off a similar game via Nimble Quest which was approved. What parts need more independent sources? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.156.84 (talk) 14:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

All articles require compliance with WP:GNG. This implies extensive coverage in reliable and independent sources. Regards. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I understand that. I figured Mashable, Gamezebo, Kotaku and TouchArcade etc would be considered reliable and independent? I referenced the Nimble Quest as I've provided more extensive reliable and independent references than that approve article - since that article was approved then I assumed this one would be as well.
They're not. They're social media blogs, and as such any review found there is not scrutinised as other media, such as printed press. The Nimble Quest article was created by you, and didn't go through the AfC process, which would have dealt with these issues. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:04, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I thought that since Mashable, Gamezebo, Kotaku, TouchArcade etc all go through a editor review process they would be considered reliable. I didn't write or have any input in the Nimble Quest article so I don't know what process that went through. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.47.225 (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure what the gaming editors consider reliable; that might be the case. I usually set the bar a bit higher than that, since those sites are not independent, regading games. Well, the Nimble Quest article was nominated for deletion, but the consensus was keep. Anyway, your article will be reviewed if you resubmit it. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Is there a quick way to resubmit? Or should I just re add the submit header? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.47.225 (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
If you head over to the submission page, on the big red decline template, there's a "When you are ready to resubmit,click here" link. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
There's no decline template. I guess it wasn't ever officially declined? If you could decline it for me I'll resubmit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.47.225 (talk) 20:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The article is currently awaiting review. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

That bridge at AFC

I looked at that bridge article and accepted it. It's now located at Locate Creek Bridge. Cheers, TCN7JM 20:32, 30 April 2013 (UTC).

Thank you! It's especially hard, given Doncram submits a ton of them, that's why I wanted your input. Thanks once again, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Robert M. Nerem

Had you read the article before you declined it? The contributor listed it for G7 in response to your comment. I declined the speedy and accepted the article because there is enough in it as originally submitted to meet WP:PROF in about 10 different ways, and an official university source is acceptable evidence of that, I know you did not mean to scare off the contributor & had no reason to expect that they wouldn't improve it. But people do that--hopeless ones persist unreasonably, promising ones back off unreasonably. We have to be explicit in declining an article about someone very clearly notable but in need of improvement that only some more work is needed; it's a different situation from when the article does not show notability on its face. DGG ( talk ) 03:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

My decline for being unreferenced was merely an incentive for the editor to add sources. I regret it was misunderstood, and I'll make sure my future declines for this reason state that more clearly. Cheers, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

My "Damn Kids" Wikipedia Page

Hey FoCuSandLeArN,

I submitted a Wikipedia article on the artist "Damn Kids". After I finished writing the article, I submitted it for review.

When I got it back, for some reason the page created the same information 3 times over. I have since deleted the excess info, and kept only what was needed.

I have also added a reference, which is "Damn Kids" bio page from BBC. He has just released a new track and BBC has featured it.

Is there anything else that my article is missing? I would like to have this up as soon as possible.

Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thisisprovoke (talk • contribs) 17:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

If you've added independent, reliable and extensive sources, click on the resubmit link for it to be reviewed again. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Where is the resubmit link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thisisprovoke (talk • contribs) 15:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

On the red template message there's a link. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Damn Kids. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

April 2013 wikification awards!

The Greater Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For scoring 3rd place on the leaderboard of the April 2013 wikification backlog drive, FoCuSandLeArN, you are hereby awarded the Greater Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations! :)
The Gold Wikification Barnstar
For wikifying 136 articles, you are also awarded the Gold Wikification Barnstar. Keep up the good work! :)

So a print encyclopedia, a strawberry shortcake, and a sycamore walk into a bar - wait, have you heard this one? (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Reversism Submission

I am not actually trying to be humorous or nonfactual. The religion "Reversism" was actually created by four students at Takoma Park Middle School. I would appreciate it if you could give me some pointers on where to improve my article. You know, ones that could help me make a good Wiki. 

     -April900  — Preceding unsigned comment added by April900 (talk • contribs) 23:32, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

Pygmy pipehorse

Hi, I'm not sure what you mean by "this article already exists on Wikipedia". Acentronura is only one of four genera of "pygmy pipehorses", so updating the information on the "Acentronura" page will not work. One of the other genera, "Amphelikturus" is somtimes incorrectly called "Acentronura", but the other two are definitely something entirely different. I have only used the image of Acentronura as an example, hence the possible misunderstanding. Tesk0002 (talk) 23:52, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for getting back to me. Wouldn't they fall under Hippocampinae then? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

No, that's a higher level category. It works as follows: Acentronura: One of five genera of pygmy pipehorse Pygmy pipehorses: Genera Acentronura, Amphelikturus, Idiotropiscis, Kyonemichthys and the extinct Hippotropiscis Hippocampinae: The above five pygmy pipehorse genera, plus the seahorses

The Hippocampinae page is nonsense, by the way, it only includes the seahorses and Histiogamphelus, a group of pipefishes that should definitely not be in there. I'll definitely fix it up when I have the time.

I've had a closer look now at the Acentronura page, and some of the entries on the biology and reproduction apply to pygmy pipehorses in general. So I have moved some of that across, but modified it considerably. Tesk0002 (talk) 03:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

But what's lower than subfamily and higher than genus? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Good point - but remember that taxonomic levels above the species (which can be fairly clearly defined on the basis of the ability to interbreed or not) are entirely arbitrary anthropogenic concepts, what is considered a distinct genus in one group can be a different subfamily in another (I prefer to look at issues like these in terms of genetic distance, which makes more sense because it is continuous rather than categorial). The problem with the pygmy pipehorses is that they are such an obscure group that they were never even considered when the Hippocampinae were established, they were treated as pipefishes. Only with the discovery of Idiotropiscis (whose members look almost like seahorses) has it become clear that they do not belong in that group. Personally, I would establish an entirely new subfamily for the pygmy pipehorses, but that is just an artefact of the human tendency of putting everything into a distinct drawer, while in this case, one genus in my made-up drawer is more closely related to a genus in a different drawer than it is to some of the genera in its own drawer.

Having said that - it is nonetheless very clear what a pygmy pipehorse is because their morphology can be readily defined: like seahorses, they have a prehensile tail and a brood pouch that has evolved into a sealed sac. The only difference is: they do not swim upright. It's a bit like "Reptilia" - everybody knows what it is, but it doesn't actually exist because "Aves" clusters right within it. Tesk0002 (talk) 09:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

...I just had a look, there really is a page on Wikipedia called "Reptiles", which suffers from the exact same problem as "pygmy pipehorses" - non-monophyly (replace reptiles with pygmy pipehorses and birds with seahorses, and you have the perfect analogy). I quote: "Although they have scutes on their feet and lay eggs [a prehensile tail and a brood pouch that has evolved into a sealed sac], birds [seahorses] have historically been excluded from the reptiles [pygmy pipehorses], in part because they are warm-blooded [have an upright posture]. They therefore do not appear on the list above. However, as some reptiles [pygmy pipehorses] are more closely related to birds [seahorses] than they are to other reptiles [pygmy pipehorses]  — crocodiles [pygmy pipehorses of the genus Idiotropiscis] are more closely related to birds [seahorses] than they are to lizards [pygmy pipehorses of the genera Acentronura, Amphelikturus and Kyonemichthys]  — cladistic writers who prefer a more unified (monophyletic) grouping usually also include the birds [seahorses), which include over 10,000 species.[3][4][5] (See Sauropsida.) [See Hippocampinae]"

In other words: if you want to continue blocking the pygmy pipehorse page, you should at least be logically consistent and delete the entire reptile page - perhaps some of it is salvageable and could be moved across to the Sauropsida page. The cladists will be grateful. Everyone else will be outraged. Tesk0002 (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Ok, you've made your point, and it is well put, I have to say. Let me see what I can do. In the meanwhile, resubmit the article if you haven't already. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Jean-Pierre Bardet page

Dear FoCuSandLeArN:

I noticed your comment about extensive citations from independent sources on the page I submitted. I have citations from 4 independent, reliable sources, including UT Arlington and the National Academy of Engineering. The page I based this page on, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yannis_C._Yortsos, has a single citation. What is the difference so I can make the proper changes and get this approved (I hope)? Thanks for any guidance you can give.

UTAcoe (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)UTAcoe

Both the article you've submitted and the Yortsos article are lacking in several areas, but I'll address your article given it's pertinent. First of all, it's structured like a CV. Bullet points should be used in rare situations, as an encyclopaedia usually uses prose. Your article doesn't provide any references. Biographies in particular require a significant amount of references due to their fragility with regards to negative material frequently being added. So plenty of the statements need precise referencing from sources that are independent of the subject, including but not exclusively: media, books, etc. These references need to obviously be reliable, and those mentions should be extensive, not just passing ones. If he conducts research, this also applies, which means that you cannot reference his research with his own material. If such references cannot be found, then WP:GNG won't be fulfilled, and the subject is non-notable for Wikipedia. Hope this helps. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)


UTAcoe (talk) 15:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)UTAcoe THis helps. Thanks.

Hola

de dónde eres que tienes el Español como lengua materna?  Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Un poco de todos lados, tu? Habiendo visto tu talk page, dejame adivinar: padre cubano, madre irlandesa? Saludos, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Ojalá tuviera un padre irlandés (y que fuera Bono), no, de hecho mis dos padres son cubanos y yo soy cubana, pero me gusta hablar inglés, de hecho me gusta más que el español. Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
A mi tampoco me gusta el español! Ah, entonces por eso la bandera irlandesa. Viste a U2 en concierto alguna vez? Estás en Cuba ahora o se fueron? Si se fueron, cómo se fueron? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Vivo en Cuba todavía, y nunca he tenido el privilegio de verlos en concierto, tal vez nunca lo haga, me sentiría muy mal si no llegara a ir a un concierto de U2 :'( They are my favorite band of all times. Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Yo espero poder verlos también! Cualquier cosa que necesites preguntame. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Muchisimas gracias. tengo que irme por ahora. pero tengo tu talk page en mi watch list. salU2  Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:30, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Estoy aki!

Como estás? Miss Bono (zootalk) 12:13, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hola hola. Todo bien? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:34, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Si, pero mucho trabajo y adfemas estudiando para los examenes de ingreso a la Universidad, tu? Miss Bono (zootalk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Uf, qué vas a estudiar? Mucha suerte! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:52, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Matematicas, español e Historia, pero lo que mas trabajo me da es Mates. Gracias por la suerte. El examen es el 7 de mayo  Miss Bono (zootalk) 16:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, FoCuSandLeArN/Archive 8. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Technical 13 (talk) 15:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Help....there's an article in my sandbox!

I finished an article and it appears on Wikipedia but it also redirects to my sandbox, and I want to start a new article. How can I get rid of it?Margaretwmiller (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ms. Miller! Since you asked your question of a specific user, I have adjusted the Help me template accordingly. Since you've already posted on this talk page, you can disregard that part in the box. If I may be of assistance, you have the power to blank the page of your sandbox and start on a new article. Just use the edit box to select all the code/text and then blank the page. It will never be lost completely, because it remains in the History of your sandbox page. – PAINE ELLSWORTH CLIMAX! 19:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
(edit conflict) The article is still in the sandbox. I will explain how to move it on the user's talk page. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Fungal derived nanoparticles

I added an introduction section as you requested, is there anything else I need to do? Thank you very much. Raudabaugh DB (talk) 18:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Unleashed_tour

Hello FoCuSandLeArN

Thank you for your feedback on the new page I was creating for the Fleetwood Mac 2009 world tour, after reviewing your feedback and I wish to understand why other pages are allowed and available for other yearly world tours by the band (example - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Fleetwood_Mac_World_tour_–_2013, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Say_You_Will_Tour, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tusk_Tour), but that this tour page is not allowed. I would have though that Wikipedia strove for consistency with their pages, and currently in my opinion many of the Fleetwood Mac year on year world tour pages are missing, this was what I was trying to change and update this and provide a level of consistency so that all the yearly world tours were documented on Wikipedia, thoughts......

Thanks

Neil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmfanuk (talk • contribs) 10:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FoCuSandLeArN. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wikify.
Message added 03:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nolelover Talk·Contribs 03:29, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Surriya Naseem

Dear FoCuSandLeArN:

You marked Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Surriya Naseem as unreferenced. Actually, it had three invisible references which showed up when I added a reflist. They are pretty inadequate, but I thought I'd let you know in case you want to adjust your comment. —Anne Delong (talk) 23:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Cheers for that! looks like I missed it. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

TY for yr comments Mentabolism (talk) 19:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't know what you mean, but cheers! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Islamic Azad University Khorasgan Branch

Dear FoCuSandLeArN, hello, As you mentioned in your comment, the article is a copy paste of the university website( but not the exact passage)but we have provided license to do so. I have eliminated promotional words. I have tried the text to be informative providing some information for the readers. I Have spent a long time to work on it. I am some how tiered of it as my mother tongue is not English but persian. Please help me in this matter. Mehrnazar (talk) 04:16, 7 May 2013 (UTC)mehrnazar

I'd be glad to. A few points: familiarise yourself with the WP:MOS; include an Template:Infobox university; make sure you create proper sections and subsections; avoid external links in-line; I would personally create a gallery at the bottom with all the relevant images, otherwise it disrupts the page's layout too much. You might also like to contact the appropriate WikiProject, which might help you in editing the article. Hope this helps, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boreal Taiga

Dear FoCuSandLeArN,

I appreciate you reviewing my work on artist/musician Boreal Taiga. I am currently researching methods to properly reference sources for the artist so the page will be accepted. I've added syndicated radio show links from the USA as well of when the artist's music was aired and lists when the artist made the top 50 those years. I also listed the movie the artist created the soundtrack for of which was shown worldwide. With other sources listed, how else can I properly reference sources? Would not radio airplay as well as a movie soundtrack work for this? I also know the artist was asked by the Norwegian National archives to send them the first album/CD of which they did. It was sent to the Norwegian National Bibliotech or Nasjonalbiblioteket as it was recorded in Norway. The artist informed me they are in contact with the Library to get a link for a reference. Would this also work? Maybe I am doing something wrong, and I will continue researching ways to do this properly. Any sort of advice is welcome as well. I thank you for your time. AbarisAbaris23 (talk) 09:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Please see WP:RS(and WP:REFB for how to cite), WP:GNG and WP:COI. Basically, the artist needs extensive references in independent and reliables sources, such as books, newspapers, etc. A national archive could be reliable if it has a suitable criterion for including said artist. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Creation Tucker Hollingsworth

Thanks for the review, FoCuSandLeArN -- I added two independent curatorial reviews. Plett bay (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Purolator USA article declined

Hi FoCuSandLeArN:

Thank you for your help with getting my Purolator USA article redirected. It now shows up as Purolator International, as intended. However, the article has several flags: Reads as an advertisement, doesn't meet notability requirements, doesn't link to other articles.... Would greatly appreciate your advice with how to address these concerns. I've reviewed other articles and just don't see how mine is so different. Thanks so much! Princess Kimmie PrincessKimmie (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem. For linking read Help:Link; for notability, start here, but a useful tip is to add as many reliable third-party sources to establish the company's notability; and for changing the avertising tone, read Wikipedia:NOTADVERTISING#ADVERTISING. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

FAL... Convincing a non-expert of the value of an expert article...

Yes, I saw you get the WP:The Last Word in on that WP:CLOSEd discussion... Please, I'm asking as a friendly fellow editor, WP:Just drop it before someone accuses you of being WP:POINTy. Thanks. Technical 13 (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A "did I do that?" kitten for you!

Here, have a Steve Urkel kitty for your getting in WP:The Last Word.

Technical 13 (talk) 15:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

LOL, what an honour! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Can i Ask you a Question??

Cuál es el término en español para Jay Bird??  Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

según lo que pude averiguar, "arrendajo". ;) FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:48, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

es alguna especie de ave o algo asi??? Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

si, se les llama así a los pájaros de la familia Corvidae. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Estaba tratando de hallarle el sentido a esta frase que dijo Bono en el libro U2 by U2, pero no le encuentro sentido. Te importaría explicarme.... Bono dijo: "I was naked as a jay bird". Hasta donde sé, los arrendajos tienen plumas y no están desnudos. What a mess!! :( Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Es una metáfora. No se mucho de Bono, pero yo lo interpreto como que se encontró expuesto. Esos pájaros cantan, por lo que ejemplifican lo que es puro, inocente y noble. Al decir que estuvo desnudo como ellos, de cierta manera está diciendo que el se sintió expuesto, inocente, infantil, puro. Concuerda un poco mejor? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Creo que sí, pero el asunto es que estaba desnudo de verdad.  Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:18, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Je je, entonces es porque no usan ropa, como los humanos :P FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Jajjajaja me has sacado una carcajada y me has alegrado el día :D Gracias... jajajajajajajajajaja. Tengo que pasar un curso de Bonolés (el lenguaje de Bono según sus amigos) Miss Bono (zootalk) 20:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Pygmy Pipehorse article

Please look at what I've said here...apparently I was not coming across well, from how I was responded to. Revent (talk) 21:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Admin Nominators

Hello. You are invited to join WikiProject Admin Nominators, a project which aims to support editors interested in nominating at Requests for Adminship. We hope that you will join and help to shape the new project. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 22:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Predatory publishers

I've replied on my talk p.

btw, keep up the good AfC reviewing! I do think you've been a little too gentle with some recent promotional afcs, and I nominated a few as G11 & also deleted a few I thought obvious--the easiest way to see which is by looking for redlinks in your contributions. DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that! Yeah, I've noticed a few, plus I get the new red notifications now. Some of them do come back for a second go, so if I'm not too harsh it's because I want them (maybe it's a fool's hope!) to make the necessary changes when they do. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:09, 9 May 2013 (UTC)


update to new article Kyle James Hauser

added several 3rd party references, please take a look/advise! thanks! 74.142.179.82 (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Sara Jay

What more references can you want? IMDB, AVN and her official site? Let me know. Vickyvette (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Please do not revert reviews. An article can be resubmitted for review, but reviews are not reverted without a proper reason. Those are not independent nor reliable sources. If you have independent and reliable sources showing extensive coverage of Sara Jay, then please include them in order for her notability to be established. Kind regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

What do you mean, not independent or reliable? IMDB and AVN ARE the ONLY really reliable sources in adult? Sara has been in the business for over 10 years? What more do you need? Kindly respond. The page I was creating was unilaterally deleted with all the work I put into it. Vickyvette (talk) 01:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

It is a possibility that the person might not fulfil Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Imdb is not considered a reliable source in Wikipedia, and AVN is not independent of the subject. With independent and reliable sources, we usually mean magazines, newspapers, major news outlets, etc. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I do not understand why you would delete all my work without any talk whatsoever. It's not advertising. It is a noteable person in adult.Vickyvette (talk) 01:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I did not delete your submission. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
For aa prøve om du er norsk...FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Comalcalco Article

Thanks for your review of Comalcalco (Archaeological Site). I am rather new to this and have to admit I had some very glaring grammar problems in the article... Would you kindly look it over again and perhaps give me some more feedback whenever you get a chance? I looked at the most glaring problems, I think. Thanks again. Alvaradodavide (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I placed a copy edit tag so that that would be addressed sooner or later, but I'll read over it again in more detail and make some corrections shortly. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Joe Esposito (basketball) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Churches in Uruguay

Hi FoCuSandLeArN. Thank you for giving a helping hand. Well, to tell you the truth: it is not very easy to write these articles, as many times the information is simply missing. My basic reference is Parroquias de Montevideo, you see, it does not say much (and from time to time I discover small errors there I have to correct by simply "knowing" the given church...). I am writing them one by one, as long as I get additional references.

So, if you feel like helping, my suggestion is: just review the syntax and spelling of my English text, just to ensure that it is decent and formal. Or: if you discover any useful link with information about a church (for instance: homepage of a parish, unknown historic pictures, etc.) feel free to include it in the article. Best regards, --Fadesga (talk) 09:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I'll review your articles from time to time. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

European road AfC

I have accepted it. It is an Autobahn at the national level, so it is notable. It is now located at North Autobahn, and I revised a redirect that was affiliated with it. TCN7JM 21:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Thought so. Do you work with European articles too? Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I normally don't work with European articles, but I could fairly easily expand a European road article. There are only a few standards that are too terribly different for WP:USRD and all the road articles are in the scope of WP:HWY. Cheers, TCN7JM 18:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC).

Wikipedia:Articles_for_Creation/Gameplay_of_The_Sims_3

Hi and this is Sundogs, who is the submitter of Gameplay of The Sims 3 for articles for creation recently. And I was creating this page due to Articles for Good Article status recently that it suggested on The Sims 3 talk page archive 3 subpage. So, I did without any knowledge on reliable sources that can make an article for creation here on Wikipedia. So, please enlighten me on where to begin on the reliable sources to be appropriate for this process and what do you think, in honest professional opinion, on how to create a page. I am also in the process in getting the page longer and more detailed but the reviewer for G.A. status states that The Sims 3 is details and the gameplay should be split into another page like World of Warcraft and more (please look at the Talk Archive 3 subpage on The Sims 3 page for more details on this issue). Please be kind, I am still new at this and still learning.

Thanks.

Sundogs talk page sandbox 21:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you for referring me to the appropriate discussion. As already stated, all articles need adequate references. For a subject to be considered notable, its references need to be extensive (which means articles dedicated fully to the subject), independent (have nothing to do with the subject) and reliable (which means verifiable). For a detailed explanation of this, read WP:RS. After this condition has been met (also useful is WP:INCITE), feel free to resubmit the article draft. A good place to start is to use the Sims 3 article gameplay section (not verbatim) as a basis, and then expand on it in ways that wouldn't be appropriate for that article. As the reviewer stated, it was too detailed, so all that extra information can be put into the separate article). Hope this helps. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hi FoCuSandLeArn! Thank you for reviewing my submission. I added references from IMDB and Yahoo Movies and other Wikipedia pages. I'm brand new to Wiki and this is my first article. It's confusing! I re-submitted the article but I just wasn't sure if I'm only supposed to add the references underneath the body of the article or throughout it. I hope I'm not being a pain.  :-)

Stanley Eisen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stanleyeisen (talk • contribs) 14:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello there. References should be in-line throughout the article (make sure they're reliable). When you've finished, place {{reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and the list will automatically show. No problem, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Queen_City_Jazz

Hi, this is my first time creating a new article for Wiki. I am a student over at Mercer County Community College in New Jersey. The page I have submitted is actually a group project.

You have made a comment about the page needing more citations, but where? The character list and the summary came from the book, and certain organizations with same name are cited.

Thank you for reading over our page! Jackvoodoo (talk) 12:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Any statement which needs to be verified should be referenced. For example, if you say the book sold over 10000 copies, that needs to be verifiable. Furthermore, references need to be reliable and independent of the subject, e.g. newspapers, etc. showing extensive coverage of the subject, which is a requirement for notability guidelines. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:54, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Rahini - Reliable Sources

Hello,

I'm trying to understand how to add the following reference made to "Rahini" 

"The word “Rahini” is cited and defined in the Gorakhbodh, an esoteric Hatha yogic text called the Nathas."

Please help me! thank you Truelivingyoga (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)Heidi 5.13.2013 Truelivingyoga (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

You mean you need help with a citation? See Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, and let me know if you have any problems. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Necesito un Wikifavor

Puedes ayudarme? Miss Bono (zootalk) 19:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Si, qué necesitás? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:39, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Fue demasiado tarde, no importa. Espero que estés bien. Yo acabo de salir de mi último examen para entrar en la Universidad de la Habana. Muy extresante... :) Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:11, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Me alegra! Saludos, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:14, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
salU2.... Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Andy Cobb Article

The reference that is first in line is a notable article posted on a nationaly recognized racing website. The article articulates the subject (Andy Cobb) in the racing world and shows pictures and states facts taken from an Interview with the driver. It is now the 4th article down from that reporter and not the third as stated prior. The reporter even talks about the driver growing up with Nascar recognized people and racing in different series. This driver races in the World of Outlaws Series and other series that are nationaly known. A site was even included to display the drivers name finishing in a national race. He races with people such as Tony Stewart and Kasey Kahne and is a regular at a track owned by Bubba The Love Sponge and is interviewd on the radio programs regularly. Why is an article of that nature not natable or indipendent enough to prove the subjects notability. He also drives for a world famous country music band which logo can be seen on his drivers suit in the pictures in the article. Please review the new article again at this link http://www.hoseheads.com/richard.html and reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FloridaRaceFan (talk • contribs) 19:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

I recommend you read WP:GNG, specifically Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Motorsports. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, FoCuSandLeArN. You have new messages at Anne Delong's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sick Seconds.

Hi there, I have never created a new page before and would really appreciate your help on this one! I was approached by the band's frontman Barry Harris to create the page. There is very little source material available as they are a very new band, except for the band's official website. Harris is a well known name on the Canadian music scene and also flirted with international success in the late 80s with Kon Kan and Thunderpuss in the 90s and 00s, so the Sick Seconds page is certainly worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. Many thanks Servitor Vek (talk) 07:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:COI to begin with. Whether an article is worthy of inclusion depends on Wikipedia guidelines, in this case, Wikipedia:Notability (music). If the group currently has no extensive coverage in independent and reliable sources, then I'm afraid it would be best if you hold on to that submission for a little while until it does. The member's notability is by no means an indication of the new group's. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:23, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Dorianism

Hello! How do you expect me to have reliable sources when I came up with the ism myself? The only source is my way of life. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirrior (talk • contribs) 02:20, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid the article will not be accepted in that case. Please refer to WP:NOT. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:14, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

Fashion Fair Mall

Just a heads-up, malls are generally considered notable. I would think that one comprising 140 stores is definitely notable. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

It might be, but not until the appropriate references are provided. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

My Libro

ayer cree mi pagina de firmas y me gustaria mucho que la firmaras. thanks! :)

Here User:Miss_Bono/Guestbook, just take a look at the rules and go for it ;) Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Gracias, espero no pasar a un second place cuando otra wikipedista cubana entre al grupo ;) Miss Bono (zootalk) 17:45, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The importance of serotyping nosocomial infections

I know you didn't create this article, but since you've contributed to it you should be aware. -- Scray (talk) 20:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough. I just curated the article. Didn't think it would stand a chance, but you never know. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you very much for your suggestion sir, I will concentrate on implementing a more focused notability factor in regards to Mr. Luckett. Tammy :) Tammy pruit (talk) 03:25, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Source: Hassan Alavikia

I don't have any indepedent sources because he is my grandfather. I made this page because there are currently no biographies about him on the Internet. I think Wikipedia is the best platform to share his biography with the world, as he was an important figure in Iranian history. Thank you, I appreciate this opportunity to share his biography on Wikipedia. Please let me know if I should make any further changes.

I am sure that if he was an important Iranian figure, independent and reliable sources will be easy to obtain. Also read WP:COI. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Linda Holeman

Hi - As a novice, I misunderstood the referencing details required. I have re-referenced and re-submitted this article with what I hope are correct and full references. RefToolbar was very useful! My apologies for wasting your time. Rfreemania522 (talk) 01:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello there! That's great. You're article will be reviewed as soon as possible. The toolbar is very handy indeed! :) FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Rejection of TUM CREATE Limited article

Dear FoCuSandLeArN,

Thank you for reviewing my article on TUM CREATE Limited. You rejected my article due to incorrect referencing. I took all information from the company's website www.tum-create.edu.sg. As I am new to Wikipedia I am not familiar with its referencing methods when it comes to the content of article on companies. Is it enough to state the website once for referencing? Would you be so kind and help me concerning this matter?

Thank you. EvaTum (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello there. References need to be independent of the subject, and reliable (verifiable). For more information, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources provides a thorough explanation. Also, I believe Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) will be of use. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Bruce Piasecki Page

Thanks for the comment! This is not an autobiography. Could you give me an example of a sentence that you feel is promotional? Any guidance would be much appreciated.

Mcneely12345 (talk) 14:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)McNeely12345

Well, it's not encyclopaedic to list how many books he wrote nor times he appeared on TV. Statements such as "more than 400 CFOs at Stone Mountain", "The concept took off" or "Piasecki and his team of senior associates provide critical training to leaders and rising leaders for some of the world’s leading organizations" do not enhance the article's value, nor the subject's notability. But most importantly, references need to be independent and reliable. For more information, see WP:GNG and Wikipedia: Identifying reliable sources. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Recent trip

It is fantastic FoCuS! We were fortunately able to do the whole trip on the cheap, despite staying in an attractive and convenient location. I did great with the shelling, and everything else was just marvelous all round. The only downsides really were that we got bitten quite a lot by mosquitos at night there, and there were a couple of cockroaches as big as mice (really!) living in the house we stayed in (which was brand new). Best, Invertzoo (talk) 15:28, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Ha ha! That sounds amazing. A bit like Jurassic Park :P Just looking at that water makes me so jealous! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:49, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Isanavarman I

added in-line quotes to online sources of Vickery and Coedès Absinthia (talk) 01:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Heather_Vogel_Frederick

Hi as a beginner in the world of Wikipedia, I was not aware how many references were required in the creation of an article. I guess the existing author ones that I looked at did not have as many references. Anyway, I have added more references and resubmitted my article. Also, this article is for a school project and not an autobiography- I did not mean for it to seem like an autobiography. Thanks :) 15sophiah (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Good guides are Wikipedia:IRS and WP:GNG. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

MCHIP

Is MCHIP/USAID US federal gov't? If so, it's likely not copyrighted, most works of the US federal gov't are public domain. --j⚛e deckertalk 19:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

It is, but I don't see the encyclopaedic value of copy-pasting a Govt. website on Wikipedia. In that case the user's better off going there for information. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giorgio Li Calzi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yves St. Laurent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

David Schechter, MD

Establishing Notability

Making the determination that Dr. Schechter is or is not "notable" depends on one's perspective and agenda. It is somewhat like deciding whether the recent actions by the IRS with respect to Tea Party and allied groups are "newsworthy." Fox News is putting this story front-and-center. CNN Headline News isn't even covering it, focusing instead on the play-by-play action in the Jodi Arias trial. It really boils down to whether you think the whole story is about a right-wing witch hunt or the illegitimate usurpation of power by an unaccountable bureaucracy.

What makes Schechter "notable" (if he is indeed notable) is that he is the first person to publish a peer reviewed study of John Sarno's "Tension Myositis Syndrome," or more accurately, "Tension Myoneural Syndrome" or "TMS" psychological approach to diagnosis and treatment of back pain. Both TMS and John Sarno are already in Wikipedia, and both refer to Dr. Schechter's study. So at least one of his accomplishments has been "duly noted" twice in Wikipedia already.

On the other hand mainstream medicine generally sees Sarno as a crackpot and the TMS approach, as medieval. (In fact, a rather heated debate on TMS took place on the Wikipedia TMS entry itself a few years ago. Evidently, you (i.e., the Wikipedia reviewers) ultimately opted to include the subject in the encyclopedia.) Prior to Schechter's study, the basis for dismissing TMS was that there were no peer-reviewed studies on the subject by reputable publications. So, is Schechter just a crackpot's disciple, or an early pioneer in an idea that may effect a paradigm shift in treating chronic pain? Pioneers instigating paradigm shifts are notable. Cackpots' disciples are not.

I think I can provide references for Schechter's credentials, by referring to the boards that confer them. Citations for some of his notable activities in sports medicine may be harder to document in publicly available sources. My real challenge is to explain why he is "notable" without sounding "promotional," when the subject is not a household name.

Any suggestions you might have on how I might approach this would be helpful. Meanwhile, I will do my best to make the language sound less promotional and add verifiable references wherever possible.

Thanks for taking the time to read this. I fully support your efforts to keep Wikipedia honest.

It's actually simpler than that. Anything that can't be verified or could be contested (which you don't have an independent and reliable reference for) should be removed. You could start by submitting a stub for review, with basic information that passes WP:GNG, and then expanding the article as you find more references. It is important to note that no person is notable under Wikipedia guidelines by simply being associated to an individual that is. Also, the fact that someone published research articles isn't enough either; instead, the researcher's overall contribution to the subject matter must be of importance for it to be notable, according to WP:ACADEMIC. Of course, the quality of said published work is of paramount importance, and I need not mention anyone can publish work in an open journal, while not everyone can have peer-reviewed work published. But this is inherently assumed in the aforementioned policy. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FoCuSandLeArN/Archive_8&oldid=1145842759"