User talk:Flying fox

Would be good[edit]

Would be good if you would look the term CIVIL UNREST up before using it. People keep telling you this and I am about to put in a complaint against you.

Who the hell are you and why do you keep vandalising my work. I'm putting in a complaint against you for biased writing. Civil unrest is a Lebanese youth smashing the front windscreen of my car. Where do you live by the way? Do you even know anything about this event? I live in Cronulla. My knowledge is mostly first hand and I'll bet your source is the sterilised government press releases.

Sydney riots[edit]

If you have a source for the sexual assaults , please show it.--CltFn 02:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Me. I was there.

QUOTE "The move followed assaults a week ago on two volunteer lifeguards at the beach, which is a popular gathering place for Muslims from inner-city suburbs, and allegations that local women were being harassed."

http://au.news.yahoo.com/051211/19/x6ce.html

Welcome Flying fox![edit]

Hello, Flying fox, I'm xaosflux and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date, and use edit summaries whenever you change a page. If you have any questions, need help or assistance, check out Wikipedia:Ask a question or contact me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Enjoy Wikipedia!!

xaosflux ^T/_C 04:33, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem?[edit]

Why are you reverting edits by other people and attributing those original edits to me? --Elliskev 02:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am fixing vandalism by you and other ignorant people who know nothing of this event. When I see crap I flush it.

As I explained on the talk page, I haven't added any content to this article. I'm only rearranging the references to a list at the bottom and linking to the list. --Elliskev 02:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flying Fox. I know you think you have special knowledge of this. But you have to respect other people's right to edit. Otherwise, people can start asking for you to be blocked temporarily. Regards, Ben Aveling 02:51, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Only if they respect my right to edit it back. Go suck eggs.

Will you please stop saying that I'm vandalizing! I'm not even making rearrangement of sources anymore! What's your problem? --Elliskev 02:55, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stop vandalising and I'll stop telling everyone.

Your edits to 2005 Sydney Race Riots[edit]

Greetings. I have noticed that you have made a number of edits to 2005 Sydney Race Riots which you have characterized as reverting vandalism. Furthermore, you have placed comments in the article which are not appropriate for article space, such as "fixing vandalism by elliskev" [1] and "STOP FRIGGIN CHANGING MY WORK YOU RETARDS!!!!!! I CAN PLAY ALL DAY!!!!!" [2]. Please restrict comments of that nature to the article's talk page, and if you are having difficulty agreeing with other editors as to the content of this article, please seek consensus on the talk page before making significant changes to the work done by others. Also, please refrain from characterizing disagreements over content or style as "vandalism". If you continue to make the kind of edits that you have been making, you are likely to be blocked from editing on Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any specific questions of concerns about Wikipedia policies. BD2412 T 02:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No.

P.S You talk too much.

P.P.S I saw your picture. You should get a shave.

"Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit."

This is a blatant lie. I just tested it. If you have any sense of decency in you whatsoever please ammend this to the more accurate statement.

"Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ruled by an elitist cabal that can only really be edited by administrators."

I hate lying scumbags.

You don't have to be an administrator to edit. Anyone can edit. And sometimes people don't agree, so we there are rules to help us work together. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this is mind while editing. Thanks, Ben Aveling 03:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who decides on the rules? I didn't get any say in these sifling regulations set by the Cabal. Seems a bit of an omission to not say anything about this dictatorship regime on the front page. You have an elitist system of old timers well past their use by date telling everyone else how to write. Get stuffed!

Just be reasonable, polite and NPOV. That's all you need to do. -

G^t 03:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from posting by a WOG! What a surprise and what a beautiful example of how screwed up and corrupt Wikipedia is. I don't think I need much more. I write about internet user groups and societies for magazines from time to time. I did a great piece on ezboard last year. An Italian banning from Wikipedia for commenting on how WOG's started the Cronulla Beach episode. Thankyou very much. That's perfect. Just what I need for my last paragraph. Watch the Washington Post. Ciao.

Whoa, calm down. I'll have you know that I'm not ethnically Italian at all. I just happened to be born there. Please choose your words more carefully next time. --Merovingian 04:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Too late buddy. I've got your number you biased joke of an editor. Blocking someone who has first hand experience of an event in favour of newspaper jockeys who are only stealing lines from editorials and rewriting them. You have only given me an exclamation point for a series paragraphs I've already composed detailing my experience so far with this 'encyclopedia'. This place is an abortion.

Criticism of Wikipedia is fine, but I encourage you to be civil and fair. --Merovingian 04:18, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked me. Not vice versa. Nothing civil or fair about that. You are abusing a power you shouldn't even have. It demonstrates that Wikipedia has a centralised power structure composed of users with no special talent or sense of fairness. Just power hungry little dictators like you. Thats a recipe for unfair and biased reporting from untalented wannabe's. You just block anyone who says differently. Very convenient. I don't know where you crawled out from underneath but even WOG's call themselves WOGs in Australia. I hope you are taking notes. A good writer looks at both sides of an issue. Never mind. You wouldn't understand.

Whatever. --Merovingian 04:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Biased 'and' a wordsmith. Such a combination. Tutto Bene!

I told you: I'm not Italian, nor can I speak it. Please stop. --Merovingian 05:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Waynemushroom.gif listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Waynemushroom.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Sherool (talk) 21:02, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]