User talk:Farell37
Snow in Almeria[edit]
.jpg)
This picture shows that there is snow in Almeria, and this is the Calar Alto Observatory, pictured in January 2021 after Storm Filomena. 2603:8001:B202:3294:A56F:8E87:3D6C:FD3A (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- The climate section is about the snow on the City, not on the Almeria mountains. The only thing on the climate section that talks about outside the city it's the climate classification.
- Also, why you edited my sandbox? Farell37 (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some autonomous communities were not included in your sandbox. 2603:8001:B202:3294:A56F:8E87:3D6C:FD3A (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you for that, I'll add sooner! Also, you can add the Calar Alto Observatory snow on his page or even on Almeria province article, when is more appropriate, because the Storm Filomena was one of the coldest cold wave registered in Spain. Farell37 (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- The sandbox shows your missing Asturias, La Rioja, Navarre, Baleric Islands, Canary Islands, Ceuta, and Melila. 2603:8001:B202:3294:A56F:8E87:3D6C:FD3A (talk) 19:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Alright, thank you for that, I'll add sooner! Also, you can add the Calar Alto Observatory snow on his page or even on Almeria province article, when is more appropriate, because the Storm Filomena was one of the coldest cold wave registered in Spain. Farell37 (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some autonomous communities were not included in your sandbox. 2603:8001:B202:3294:A56F:8E87:3D6C:FD3A (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Don't reply to sockpuppets![edit]
You can also engage here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents as it seems you are the main target of these vandal/disruptive socks coming from the same IP Range. WikiEditor1890 (talk) 20:05, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- My friend, thank you so much for reporting it! I was wondering how to report it, because, this IP adress is trying to make disruptive edits on various articles. Farell37 (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
May 2024[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. No, my friend - per Wikipedia:CYCLE and Wikipedia:Stable version - you must have consensus on your new controversial changes. Once others agree with your version, then new changes will be made. Pushing your new version without consensus will result in your account being reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Moreover, the description of changes is not place for discussion. Thank you for creating the discussion thread. When (if) the new changes gain consensus - then the new changes will be implemented in the articles. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's not how it works. You are adding wrong information. The sources clearly shows that is hot semi-arid, not mediterranean. This needs to be engage on talk page, not just ignoring it, when there's people proving that is hot semi-arid Farell37 (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- But that's how it works. Wikipedia rules exist to prevent people like you from trying to push through new own controversial changes. Your changes have been contested and therefore consensus is needed to implement them. Your Source does not directly describe Valencia's climate as semi-arid, at the moment this looks like a violation of the Wikipedia:No original research. Beyond that, there are a few other problems, explained in the discussion. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not the only one who thinks that Valencia climate is hot semi-arid. Please see the discussion. This is not original research. Do you know that climate classification is based on climate data and not on maps? A good exemple is Los Angeles. Much sources claim that is mediterranean climate, but in the new reference period it is hot semi-arid. Farell37 (talk) 14:00, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- But that's how it works. Wikipedia rules exist to prevent people like you from trying to push through new own controversial changes. Your changes have been contested and therefore consensus is needed to implement them. Your Source does not directly describe Valencia's climate as semi-arid, at the moment this looks like a violation of the Wikipedia:No original research. Beyond that, there are a few other problems, explained in the discussion. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 13:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Valencia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)