User talk:Farbod628

Your submission at Articles for creation: OnDemandKorea (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OnDemandKorea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 02:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Farbod628, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 02:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 00:31, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:OnDemandKorea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OnDemandKorea. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:42, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:OnDemandKorea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:OnDemandKorea. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OnDemandKorea (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OnDemandKorea and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 02:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:OnDemandKorea

Hello, Farbod628. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OnDemandKorea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 23:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OnDemandKorea

Hello Farbod628,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OnDemandKorea for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

I contested the deletion. Thank you.

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Farbod628. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Farbod628|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
• there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

I have added the COI in my profile. I strongly believe at the request of our Facebook following, Twitter following, and 2 million monthly visitors, that the page needs a Wikipedia.

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. You said I strongly believe at the request of our Facebook following, Twitter following, and 2 million monthly visitors, that the page needs a Wikipedia. Good, for you, unfortunately none of that has anything to do with our notability criteria posted above. Your comment on my talk page referred to We and our. You are not allowed to edit on behalf of a company, and you don't own any page. You said We based our page model exactly off of theirs. The fact that other articles have not been deleted doesn't help you, either they met the criteria or should be deleted as well. See What about article x?. Also note that many articles would have been accepted before the notability guidelines were made stricter.

I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources as I've previously described above. Your sources included blogs, press releases, interviews and other unsuitable sources. Apart from your links with other companies, none of your text has independent third-party sources
• Your article was entirely about what you sell, so nothing to support notability as defined by us not as you would like it to be. You appear to have no employees, income or profits, and nothing you claim about the company, has independent third-party sources. You had delivers more than 100,000 hours of officially-licensed content from leading content providers direct to viewers. The company's library of is one of the largest licensed U.S. collections available online, and contains over 56,792 episodes, but the reference you gave doesn't say that.
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, but yours is just a sales pitch. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: company delivers more than 100,000 hours of officially-licensed content from leading content providers direct to viewers. The company's library of is one of the largest licensed U.S. collections available online, and contains over 56,792 episodes... Most spammers have enough sense not to include prices for their wares, but not you A premium subscription, called ODK PLUS, costs $6.99 a month.

Declaring your COI just means that you don't get blocked immediately for not doing so, but if I think you are not following the guidance I've posted previously and today, I won't hesitate to block you for spamming. You messages show a lack of understanding or acceptance of how we work, so I suggest you read all my guidance very carefully before you try again. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)