User talk:Ericorbit/Archive29
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Cover versions.
Subject just raised its ugly head over at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs. Perhaps you might like to weigh in again in more measured tones than I can muster! --Richhoncho (talk) 14:59, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Ask
Hi. I am Jivesh. My friend told me you have access to Billboard. Could you please check if "Party (song)" bubbled under the Hot 100 at number 25 for the week ending October 15, 2011? Please. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 10:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- No, I do not see it at all. #25 on that chart this week is "Tonight" by Seether. - eo (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
- Is it at number 11 or number 4? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah yes, it is #4 this week: (11 last week, 25 two weeks ago) — Party, Beyonce Featuring Andre 3000 - eo (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you, thank you infinitely. ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 18:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ah yes, it is #4 this week: (11 last week, 25 two weeks ago) — Party, Beyonce Featuring Andre 3000 - eo (talk) 15:48, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Is it at number 11 or number 4? ★Jivesh 1205★ (talk / ♫♫Give 4 a try!!!♫♫) 06:45, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Jackpinder2001099099 also vandalised on Rihanna discography. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 18:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Yep, got it, thanks. Looks as if all his edits were vandalism & reverted. He's been blocked. - eo (talk) 18:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. Calvin • NaNaNaC'mon! 18:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
Hip-hop soul
I remember going round and round with some editor that used to mark everything under the sun as "hip-hop soul". I've encountered User:MariaJaydHicky, who has the same tendency. Can you remember the name of the other editor so I can cross-reference things?—Kww(talk) 17:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Neptunes discography
I've let myself become involved. Take a look at The Neptunes discography and User talk:MikaSan and see what you can do.—Kww(talk) 11:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Heya, could you take a look at the above article? There's a difference of opinion that needs an independant view. Thanks. Mister sparky (talk) 19:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- thanks for the reply. i'm a bit confused actually, as the user seems to be quite an experienced editor but seems obsessed with filling the tables with gaps and line breaks then reverting my edits saying its against policy... so i'm boggled. Mister sparky (talk) 16:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Wheatus A Little Respect.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wheatus A Little Respect.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Saw that you warned this user on their talk page, and you might wish to know that they're continuing to edit war. –Chase (talk / contribs) 00:07, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
certifications
why do you convert the certifications?? stop, its much easier too understand US than RIAANZ, its just messy, why bother the change???? --Mathiassandell (talk) 19:56, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
- This was already answered for you on your Talk Page, which you deleted. Please go back to your Talk Page's history and re-read it. - eo (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
a girl like me
A Girl like Me is spelled A Girl Like Me, how can you just put a rule to that: Link 1, Link2 and Link 3, its kind of clear it spelled wrong in the wikipedia tex!
change it back!
--Mathiassandell (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello
Hello Ericorbit, My friend Jivesh boodhun said you are a very friendly and nice. You could do a favor for me? I know you have been Login in Billboard.biz. I wanted to know the position of the DVD "The Ultimate Performance" by Beyoncé in the U.S. Top Music Videos chart, look at the link to me HERE. What position? Thanks. Silencio faz bem (talk) 04:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- This week it is #38, last week it was #24, with 3 weeks on the chart. Unfortunately this chart does not have a "peak position" column, so I don't know where it was two weeks ago. - eo (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
One Day (LMFAO song)
Firstly, have you seen WP:SONGCOVER? At long last we have a policy! Secondly the above article was deleted per AfD, I added a g4, which was removed by a single edit IP. Now how should it proceed? Is it a seond AfD nomination or something quicker? Great if you could deal with it? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 22:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
- But the song did peak on the UK Singles Chart. So why shouldn't it be notable? Ian Streeter (talk) 12:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The Bodyguard World Tour
Hey, eo - can you do an article move for me, please? From this The Bodyguard World Tour (1993–94) to this The Bodyguard World Tour. The reason being is for a complete comparative match of all of Whitney Houston's World Tour articles. Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Done - eo (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks!! Best, --Discographer (talk) 21:57, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Notification of AfD
I noticed you didn't notify the author of Xero Sample Tape when you nominated it for deletion. It helps when you do :) Thanks! —danhash (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artists who have recorded "Jingle Bells"
Any thoughts on this AfD closure? There's more comments on my userpage. Cheers. Hope the wiki and other world is well with you. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
- Howdy, sorry I didn't get to this in time. I'd have suggested merging or deleting this. How about an article for every human being who has ever sung "Happy Birthday"? - eo (talk) 10:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Ericorbit. This user is making unconstructive edits to Sugababes discography by removing well-sourced information. They have a long history of doing this, even on other Wikipedia articles. You posted an "only warning" message to their talk page because of the issue, although they have vandalized the article numerous times after this. Is it time for a block? Till I Go Home (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- well, the last warning was way back in April. I've semi-protected Sugababes and will leave another warning. - eo (talk) 13:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- The last warning may have been back in April but that doesn't mean the last time they vandalized was in April. Thank you for the semi-protection. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello
I created List of number-one Billboard Alternative Albums of 2011 yesterday and it is a bit of an orphan; do you have any suggestions of where to put more links to it? NYSMtalk page 23:07, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm I would suggest putting it as a "see also" on the Alternative Songs #1 lists, and definitely on the Billboard charts template. Are you going to continue with prior years? - eo (talk) 12:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm going to try and work on prior years after the holidays, but I'm definitely going to make 2012 next week. Do you know how far this chart goes back? "Alternative Albums" is just a redirect. NYSMtalk page 13:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have no friggin clue. Just do Billboard lookups on Jan 1 of each year til it gives an error then narrow it down? - eo (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like the first chart was July 28, 2007: http://www.billboard.com/column/chartbeat#/charts/alternative-albums?chartDate=2007-07-28 - eo (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have no friggin clue. Just do Billboard lookups on Jan 1 of each year til it gives an error then narrow it down? - eo (talk) 14:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm going to try and work on prior years after the holidays, but I'm definitely going to make 2012 next week. Do you know how far this chart goes back? "Alternative Albums" is just a redirect. NYSMtalk page 13:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Welcome and thank you for your contributions. Your test on the page List of number-one dance singles of 1982 (U.S.) worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ItsAlwaysLupus (talk) 22:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- No, your edit is wrong. Chart is here: http://books.google.com/books?id=lyQEAAAAMBAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s#all_issues_anchor - eo (talk) 03:43, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Hot Dance Club Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The One That Got Away (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello
Hi Ericorbit. It's Tomica here. User:JohnfromPickney pointed you as a potential help for me. I work on "Unfaithful" and I will probably nominate it for GA. However, there is a problem with the Canadian chart. The song is released in 2006, prior the existence of Canadian Hot 100, meaning it has charted on the Canadian Singles Chart, I can't find reliable source. I found this, but there is no Canadian Singles Chart for "Unfaithful". You think you can find a source for this? Thanks — Tomica1111 • Question Existing? 10:28, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
He's not grasping how to edit properly and he makes no effort to communicate. He's now using forums as sources Example 1, example 2. WP:COMPETENCE is an issue as of now and a block should have happened long ago. Please look into it. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 00:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Madonna
Hi there. Just like to inform you that Madonna's new album "M.D.N.A." does have a period after the 'A' as indicated by all sources including Madonna's official website http://www.madonna.com/news/title/madonna-reveals-new-album-title. So I will change the title accordingly. Thanks :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Everything Is Beautiful (talk • contribs) 00:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- No worries... I had originally set up the red links with the final period, but then when the article was created it did not have it, so I figured someone knew something I didn't. Glad it's worked out. - eo (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Please, help me
Hello. Beyonce's songs that listed in the charts are not included in Wikipedia. They are available only by Billboard.biz, please check. Are...
- Star Spangled Banner - Hot Digital Tracks peaked at #37
- A Woman Like Me - Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles peaked at #3
- Lost Your Mind - Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles peaked at #17
- Be With You - Hot Ringtone peaked at #26
- Resentment - Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles peaked at #11
- See Me Now - Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles peaked at #2
- Love A Woman - R&B/Hip-Hop Digital Songs peaked at #50
Source: Billboard.biz Silencio faz bem (talk) 05:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- search results above in bold. - eo (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are great. Thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- No problem... sorry I forgot to do it yesterday. - eo (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Don't worry. :D It's okay. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:09, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- No problem... sorry I forgot to do it yesterday. - eo (talk) 16:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- You are great. Thanks. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Can you please check for "Broken-Hearted Girl" for the Bubbling Under Hot 100?
- Nothing for Bubbling Under Hot 100. I only see European Hot 100 (#37) and Portugal (#4). - eo (talk) 16:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:55, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Please have a look at the message here. The user is asking for your help. Please. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
You tagged this as WP:CSD#A9, but that does not apply because the artist has an article. It does not meet the notability requirements for a stand-alone song article, so in a case like that you can try PROD or AfD, but probably the best thing to do, as prescribed by WP:NSONGS is to redirect it to the album or artist article. You can also point the author to WP:NSONGS. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Quicksand
I've declined your speedy request as there is an article on the band - and has been since 2003, which makes it one of the oldest I've seen. As to the notability of the song in question, I make no comment except to suggest prod followed by AfD.... Peridon (talk) 15:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Moving page
Hello Mr. admin :) can you help me to move W.E. (film) to W.E.. There's no other page in Wikipedia using that title, so I don't see the reason why it's redirected to disambiguation. Thanks. Bluesatellite (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Done - eo (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Help me again, please. We need to move M.D.N.A. to MDNA as there's no other Wiki page using title "MDNA". This is the correct title per Interscope and Madonna's official site. Thank you very much :D Bluesatellite (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Indef block needed
User talk:Harry-potter-mania you have blocked before for bad editing. He has no concept of how to edit, they make no form of communication, every few edits they add massive WP:OR and unreliable sourcing to articles. There is WP:COMPETENCE lacking and his edits, when I see them, always get reverted for a violation of one rule or another. I think it's time for a permanent block per COMPETENCE and WP:ICANTHEARYOU for the no communication. He's been warned more times than I care to count and has had enough chances. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Done Oy. - eo (talk) 19:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- -facepalm- Thank you! There goes a massive pain in my butt. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:51, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Number-one singles of 2009 in the US
Please read this note on Hot 100 number-one singles of 2009 (US) talk page.
78.112.215.126 (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
MSU Interview
Dear Ericorbit,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 18:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
The article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.) and several other articles in this series have been renominated for deletion
Dear Ericorbit, I just wanted to let you know that an AfD, in which you participated in recently has been reopened. Please express your opinion again in the current AfD. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 00:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
The article 11.30 (Dirtiest Trick in Town) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable song, fails WP:NSONG
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayTalk to me 04:04, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
Billboard 200 Changes
Hello Ericorbit - As you may have noticed, a couple of editors are trying to make changes to the "Additional milestones" section of Billboard 200 unilaterally and without discussion. Now, much of that section is problematic because it is unsourced to start with - but we have generally excluded compilation albums and soundtracks from the various lists. I do not have any vested interest in this, but I do not like the non-collaborative nature of the edits. I will start a section on the 200 Talk page and would appreciate any input that you might have. regards, Sensei48 (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's fine with me and I'll contribute. I've been removing Eminem from that list for years now; people keep including him because of the 8 Mile soundtrack. - eo (talk) 15:49, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Driscoll TWOF.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Driscoll TWOF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Siouxsie TWOF.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Siouxsie TWOF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion over the article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.)
Dear Ericorbit. I just wanted to let you know that a merge discussion is currently taking place regarding the content of this article (as you probably remember, you participated in an AfD held over this article in the past) and the content of the rest of the U.S. number-one by-decade series of articles.
Please express your opinion on this matter in the current discussion. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
List of Billboard Hot 100 top 10 singles in 1998
So I know you have everything up to 1999 up, are you gonna be able to do 1998? Arjoccolenty (talk)
- Hi there... I don't really work on the top 10 articles (check the histories). However if you need help with '98 or any other year I'm happy to contribute. - eo (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey eo, we're having continuous problems with this user (User talk:76.89.136.150) vandalising the Jermaine Jackson article. This person keeps deleting an entire section based upon the singer's children. I left a note on their talk page, but apparently I'm not the first to do so. Could you please keep a look-out on this, that is, if you don't mind? Thanks! Best, --Discographer (talk) 18:26, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, I've semi-protected the article for a month. - eo (talk) 19:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks my friend! Best, --Discographer (talk) 19:39, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Siouxsie KTFM.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Siouxsie KTFM.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Okay I think that's enough
After the final warning you issued on User talk:Ke$ha-fa, the first edit after the warning they inserted WP:OR into Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album). They have no intention of communicating and I'm constantly reverting this user's additions. I think it's time for an indef-block. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 04:47, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, this article is being vandalised (again), probably due to the fact that the semi-protection expired and there have been rumours swirling around about an original line-up reformation. The chart positions were changed by an IP address user. Till I Go Home (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the semi-protection. Cheers, Till I Go Home (talk) 11:12, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Billboard Biz
Can you take a look and figure out what chart this IP is talking about? He's quite insistent, but I know there's no "Billboard Mexico Hot 50": http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moves_Like_Jagger&diff=485695656&oldid=485694941 —Kww(talk) 11:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- The link provided does point to a Billboard chart, but its called "Mexico Airplay". - eo (talk) 11:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
 |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 08:36, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
Speedy deletion nomination of My Kind of Love (Emeli Sandé song)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on My Kind of Love (Emeli Sandé song), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 19:51, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cher
Hey, you should take a look on Cher's article at the Wikipedia in portuguese. It's well ilustrated, very well written, complete and have a big number of references. It's also a featured article. You may translate it to english. Lordelliott (talk) 20:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cher
Sorry
Thanks so much for messaging me and i do apologize. I noticed other artists discgography's Had there caps down 'Example albums discgography' so i wanted to do the same but it all sorta got it out of control.Are you capable of deleting pages?
Please delete http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_jackson_ALLbums_Discgography_%28please_remove_mods%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_jackson_albums_Discgography http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_jackson_albums_discography
and for this page Just simply put the caps down in 'Albums' to 'albums' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Jackson_Albums_discography
again so sorry for this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tombo671 (talk • contribs) 12:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Tombo671 (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I am inviting you to have a look at the article in its current state, lots has been done since it was listed at AfD. THanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 06:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
GA notice
| GA Notice |
|---|
| Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Loud (Rihanna album) in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. --(CA)Giacobbe (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC) |
 ·  ·  · 
|
Hi, can you explain me why you keep saying Christina Aguilera was the last artist that did it? · Mcdonalds (talk · cont), at 17:51, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Because Beyonce charted with songs before "Crazy In Love" that did not reach #1. Aguilera's first two chart entries hit #1, as did Gaga's, which is what the item states. - eo (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Ban
User talk:Bachmannlover, which you have warned previously, is continually adding unreliable sourcing, synth, and original research to articles (particularly Kesha's second album and it's time for a block. He makes no effort to communicate and despite multiple final warnings to stop adding unreliable sources he continues to do so. I'm tired of reverting him. Time for a block, please. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 17:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Billboard is crediting the song "Diamonds" to both Alpert and Jackson on their top hits page dated the week of June 20, 1987 here. Should it be added? — Gabe 19 (talk contribs) 07:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmmm, okay. It's irritating when they do this retroactive re-labeling of songs. I know for sure it charted on the Hot 100 as Alpert-only. I looked thru Google Books but unfortunately there is a huge gap of missing issues in the mid-80s. Will try to locate an alternative to double-check what they did on the R&B chart when it was current. - eo (talk) 18:47, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Boston Wiknic
 |
Great American Wiknic - Boston | |
|---|---|---|
| The Second Annual Great American Wiknic will be an opportunity for Wikipedians across the Greater Boston area to meet for an afternoon of Food, Fun, and Fellowship. Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about upcoming activities, and just enjoy a day at the park! | ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/Boston/Wiknic/2012! | ||
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Meetup/Boston at 14:29, 31 May 2012 (UTC).
FAR notification
I have nominated 4 Minutes (Madonna song) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Long Train Runnin 1993.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Long Train Runnin 1993.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Transhumanism
Hi, I see you define yourself as a transhumanist. I've been working a bit on Wikipedia:WikiProject Transhumanism although it still needs a lot of work. Could you have a look at it and maybe give me some pointers? I created a little userbox to promote the wikiproject, in case you're interested. You're very welcome to subscribe as a participant, expand the project and of course improve it's articles. --Pereant antiburchius (talk) 11:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Sinead Lion Cobra Original.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sinead Lion Cobra Original.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey
Hey, could you delete all the extra revisions here? Wiki was lagging, and I was heavy on the submit button. NYSMtalk page 22:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Once again
He's adding unreliable sources and whatever he wants to an article (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kesha%27s_second_album&diff=prev&oldid=496290146). You issued your final warning previously, can you block now? Thanks. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 19:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
PCD
IN THE SOURCE I PROVIDED IT SAID "15 million albums + 37 million singles" WHICH EQUALS 52 million RECORDS! --XHugoTheNerd (talk) 20:34, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Koop Alternative Takes.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Koop Alternative Takes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
File:Siouxsie TLBOMH.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siouxsie TLBOMH.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 13:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Aaron • You Da One 13:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Re: One of your edits
Regarding this, please see [1], [2] etc. Nothing wrong with high lighting the best selling song of the year. Aaron • You Da One 13:56, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Sasse (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sasse (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasse (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Lionel (talk) 07:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination For Deletion
Please note that user space (including sandboxes) should not be used as a webhost for personal infomation, per WP:UP#NOT. Your page User:Querido0328/sandbox contains information that is obviously not being used to improve any already-existing articles. The content of a deleted article (Billboard 2012) should not be copied to your sandbox just so that you can keep it. Any non-encyclopedia content will need to be removed or it will be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion. Thanks. - eo (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I read this and what the hell? Okay, this webpage does not contain any personal information. I am making my own charts. And this is where I gather and post the data on my Billboard 2012. Yes, it contains information that is not being used to improve any articles whatsoever. The deleted (Billboard 2012) article is the same with my sandbox. Because I believed that I can make any article I want. Any article that is clean and understandable. I made the article myself. But when you deleted it, I spent hours trying to make it to my sandbox again. Don't you see? I want to make my own article. But you guys will just keep deleting it. So I made it to my sandbox. Please don't delete my sandbox. It means a whole lot to me. If an article means that a lot of people should know about it, I already shared this to my friends and family. I had rough times with this. And also good times. So again, please don't delete this. That's why it's a sandbox, I can do anything with it. Isn't it a free page for the user? I even read that it's like a testing ground. So again, don't delete it. Even if it doesn't contain encyclopedia content. Don't. Thank you for reading and have a nice day. :)
Querido0328 (talk)
11:26, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Please click the link I left on your Talk Page which will take you to the policy on what should not be in your User space. "Making your own charts" and hosting them in Wikipedia does not help the project in any way. You'll need to move this to your own personal site on the internet. - eo (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2012 (UTC)