User talk:Enter Movie/Archive 1

Archive 1

Unspecified source for Image:Saw IV.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saw IV.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kangaroo jack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kangaroo jack.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:High school high.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:High school high.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Max magician and the legend of the rings.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Max magician and the legend of the rings.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Saw iv poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Saw iv poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vampires vs. zombies.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vampires vs. zombies.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Voodoo dawn.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Voodoo dawn.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Enter Movie/Archive 1 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to the Saw film series. I'd like to invite you to become a part of Wikipedia: WikiProject Saw, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of Saw and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out and participate, please visit the project page for more information. Thanks! CyberGhostface 12:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

All you have to do is add your name to the participants list. You probably won't be doing anything else that you aren't doing already (I.E. editing the articles), but the WikiProject is so we can try to organize the articles better and set out tasks to improve them.--CyberGhostface 22:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay. — Enter Movie 22:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Welcome

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for August has been published. September's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!
• Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 23:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:HalloweenIII1_masks.jpg

Hi, thanks for your help at Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_September_8#Image:HalloweenIII1_masks.jpg. As a side note, you didnt need to upload the image again; you could have just changed the license template from {{Non-free promotional}} to {{Non-free film screenshot}}. To see why, take a look at the time/date column at Image:HalloweenIII1 masks.jpg#filehistory; note that there are now two copies of this image on the servers (they have different filenames). Not a big deal at all; many thanks for finding an appropriate template. John Vandenberg 04:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I dont think it is possible to delete the extra copy, except by uploading it as another name and then deleting the old name, but even deleted images are kept on the servers. So, dont stress about it; its all part of the learning curve :-) John Vandenberg 13:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Freddy Vs Jason Vs Ash

No offense, but I would rather you not post the ending to FvJvA. I understand the "Wikipedia contains spoilers" rule but in many ways its the equivalent to reading a script prior to its theatrical release and posting it on wikipedia. (BTW, when I made my edit summary I didn't know it was you added it, but I still think it shouldn't be there)--CyberGhostface 18:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Okay, sure. — Enter Movie 21:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Saw September 2007 Newsletter

The WikiProject Saw Newsletter Issue I - September 2007
Member news The project has currently 13 members.	From the Members Welcome to the first issue of the WikiProject Saw's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. CyberGhostface 17:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Pages Needing Cleanup List of traps in the Saw film series: This survived deletion, but it was recommended that we change the article a bit.
Current Debates Should Lawrence Gordon and Adam Faulkner be merged? See the project's discussion.
Monthly Collaboration Saw (film) is this month's collaboration. As a guide, look at other featured horror film articles such as Halloween (1978 film) and Night of the Living Dead. More external information (such as behind the scenes, reception, etc) should be added if possible.
Newsletter Challange Try to make the character articles more encyclopedic by making them less in-universe. See Jigsaw and Amanda's articles for guidance. Also see Jason Voorhees, which is a featured article. (Obviously there is more information on Jason available than the Saw characters, but it is worth looking at to see what's considered the best of the best.) With Saw IV coming out, there is bound to be a lot of vandalism and speculations. Please keep an eye on the articles. Try to invite more members to this project. If you know any Saw fans who are good with computers, invite them to Wikipedia. The more the merrier.

CyberGhostface 17:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call

Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing!

An automatic notification by BrownBot 23:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Simoncowellam.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Simoncowellam.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ejfetters 14:18, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Halloween

Ok, just to point out, there is no article for "reimagining", it redirects to "Remake". So if you are going to persist in this edit war with the editors that disagree with the terminology, please pipe the link appropriately: [[Remake|reimagining]]. Thanks.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 13:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Are you attempting to compete with me or something? I've noticed you've pulled things from my sandbox on Michael Myers, and apparently pushed your "literature" section--uncompleted from the looks--in recently. Obviously, there isn't a rule against such a thing, as anyone can edit any article they please, but it appears that you are trying to "beat" me to it. It's cool if you're just wanting to fix up the article, but not so much if you are stealing my personal research in an effort to undermine my own work; as that is the way it appears when I look at everything, and I apologize if I'm wrong.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:47, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Um, shall I pull from your sandbox and cite specific examples of where you've obviously taken from my personal Michael Myers sandbox? Do you really want that? It's one thing to work together, another to undermine the research efforts of Paul and myself and try and try and work them into the article as if you did it yourself.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter

The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 22:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject October Newsletter

The WikiProject Saw Newsletter Issue II - October 2007
Member news The project has currently 19 members.	From the Members Welcome to the second issue of the WikiProject Saw's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. It's now "Saw Weekend" and Saw IV has been out for a couple of days now. (If you haven't seen it, don't worry, I won't spoil anything for you.) Because of this, a lot of the articles are probably going to need a bit of work. I'll go into more detail on other various sections. All in all, a lot of the 'challenges' from last month's newsletter are still here. Since the release of IV will probably be the last major release of info at least until next year's V we could probably just try to improve the information we already have. We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. CyberGhostface 18:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Pages Needing Cleanup List of traps in the Saw film series: This survived deletion, but it was recommended that we change the article a bit. Detective Eric Matthews: This article could use a bit of clean-up to make it less in-universe. Since he's one of the few recurring characters outside of Jigsaw and Amanda, we could probably base it off off their formats.
Current Debates Should Lawrence Gordon and Adam Faulkner be merged? See the project's discussion. A consensus still hasn't been reached on this.
Monthly Collaboration Last month's monthly collaboration was Saw (film). As a guide, look at other featured horror film articles such as Halloween (1978 film) and Night of the Living Dead. More external information (such as behind the scenes, reception, etc) should be added if possible. A new one hasn't been decided yet. My suggestion would be to either work some more on Saw's article, or perhaps start a new collaboration.
Newsletter Challange Try to make the character articles more encyclopedic by making them less in-universe. See Jigsaw and Amanda's articles for guidance. Also see Jason Voorhees, which is a featured article. (Obviously there is more information on Jason available than the Saw characters, but it is worth looking at to see what's considered the best of the best.) Some of the plot articles seem to be overtly long. Without bowdlerizing them, maybe we could try to make them a bit shorter and concise. Try to invite more members to this project. If you know any Saw fans who are good with computers, invite them to Wikipedia. The more the merrier.

--CyberGhostface 18:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films October 2007 Newsletter

The October 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 21:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

F13

First, let's get some things straight. Wikipedia is not a current events website, it's an encyclopedia that is meant to use the most reliable sources possible. Second, scooper reports are not reliable in the least. We don't know who reported this, for all we know it could have been the damn key grip. They don't say. What they also do not do is actually say what it is. The only quote there is "it's not a remake", and then Shock Till You Drop starts to do their own speculation. Given that there is a Writer's Strike going on, and they don't have a script, and don't plan on filming for quite some time, the movie can be anything. Right now, the most reliable sources are billing it as a remake (i.e. People with actual names are the ones saying it is a remake). BTW, you have reached your 3 reverts within 24 hours (as have I). Just fair warning.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:V and WP:RS before adding any material, thank you.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 01:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Bignole on his assessment about the ShockTillYouDrop.com rumor. Since the person is unidentified, there is no indication of its validity. Anyone can say anything under the guise of anonymity. If ShockTillYouDrop.com received a statement from the director or another public figure related to the film, the information would be admissible. If this information is valid, surely it will come from a reliable source in time, and we can edit it into the franchise article. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 02:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

I know we don't know who reported this, but it says that it's "a source close to the project," who just wants to remain anonymous. I don't really know what a "damn key grip" is, but I'm sure it's not that. It could be anyone involved in the film, but I don't think it's anyone outside of the film. Is it okay is I put "It has been rumored. . . ."? — Enter Movie 02:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

A key grip works on the movie. Wikipedia is not a rumormill. The fact that they are remaining anonymous screams that they aren't an authority figure that makes these types of announcements to begin with. It's always someone "close to the project". Someone "close to the project" claimed that Tom Welling was in the running to place Superman for the new Justice League of America. His agent, and Al Gough and Miles Millar all denied such a rumor, and it later turned out that he was not in the running at all. If it's true, then Bay, Shannon, Swift, or someone else of authority will officially announce what it is when they deem appropriate.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 02:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

An authority figure doesn't need to make these announcements to prove that they're true. A key grip's announcements could even be true, but I doubt it since they haven't shot the film yet. It would probably be the executive producer(s), script supervisor, etc. And about the Tom Welling/Superman thing, I would like it if you would provide proof because you could be telling the truth or just lying. You don't need to if you don't want to though. That's why I'm suggesting we put "It has been rumored. . . ." — Enter Movie 03:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Wiki does not post "rumors". That's clearly stated in Wikipedia:Verifiability. The source is publishing a rumor, as they are not attributing any name to the source they received it from. For all we know, they've made it up, or the person they spoke with made it up. Shock Til You Drop is not above posting simple rumors. Also, the Tom Welling announcement was made on an episode of Attack of the Show, where IESB made the remark Which you can read their original article right here. To quote them:"Studio sources have exclusively revealed to the IESB that someone has been approached to fill the shoes of the Man of Steel!" -- Yet, of those studio sources were passing along real information, why is it that Welling's name has not come up since, and Gough, Millar and just about everyone else has said it wasn't true? Rumors are, as a whole, unencyclopedic and unverifiable/unreliable, because anyone can say anything they want and pass it off as a "rumor".  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Okay. But just out of curiosity, why do you put up references for the Hollywood Reporter and Bloody-Disgusting when they don't have any proof (except when they talk to the producers, screenwriters, director, etc.)? — Enter Movie 03:40, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

The Hollywood Reporter is a trade newspaper, which has editorial oversight and fact checking. They are the film equivalent of USA Today or any other news organization you think of. The only other trade newspaper for the film industry is Variety. Bloody Disgusting is an independent run website, which relies more on scooper (i.e. anonymous tips) than first hand interviews, even though they do occassionally get first hand interviews.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 03:48, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films November 2007 Newsletter

The November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Iconic Horror Template

Hey. I've never been part of a deletion debate before. How is it decided whether it gets deleted or not? And how long does that take? Thanks. Yaksar (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

If the majority of the people decide it's to be kept, then it's kept and vice versa. It probably takes 5 to 7 days. So currently, the template is at the brink of deletion. You can see the previous nomination here. — Enter Movie (talk) 13:58, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Godzilla template

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Template: Godzilla, you will be blocked from editing. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 15:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

The above template has been used incorrectly - this is a content dispute. Addhoc (talk) 15:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

No more incorrectly than Enter Movie used it on mine.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 05:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 05:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Since when do two wrongs make a right? Addhoc (talk) 11:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter

The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Terminator

WikiProject Terminator have started. Have some time looking at it. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:24, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:FvJvA.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:FvJvA.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

{{archivebox}} reverts

Hi,

What was the rationale for these edits? Using an automatic template is neater and imposes less effort on users keeping pages up to date. The clear means we've got a bit of useless whitespace at the top of the page, too. Am I missing something? Chris Cunningham (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

To me, it looks better and cleaner. If you want to change it, go ahead. I don't really care. — Enter Movie (talk) 22:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Predator technology

An editor has nominated Predator technology, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predator technology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Terminator4teaserpster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Terminator4teaserpster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Friday the 13th

You wouldn't mind us cutting and pasting your sandboxed article into Friday the 13th (2009 film)? Alientraveller (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I don't mind. Go ahead. — Enter Movie (talk) 21:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Request to move article Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Terminator Salvation: The Future Begins to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 06:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2008 Newsletter

The September 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the relevant sections again!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:25, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saw October 2008 Newsletter

The WikiProject Saw Newsletter Issue IV - October 2008
Member news The project has currently 29 members.	From the Members Welcome to the fourth issue of the WikiProject Saw's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do. Another year, and another Saw. The penultimate(?) entry to the series, Saw V, will becoming out in less than two weeks. We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask. CyberGhostface 18:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Pages Needing Cleanup List of traps in the Saw film series: This article should be improved if it is to survive deletion. Look for more below.
Monthly Collaboration Perhaps for the remainder of this month (and the next couple of ones) we can work on Saw V's article. I have a feeling once the film comes out the page will be filled to the brim with information, a lot of which could be trimmed. The other film articles could use some work as well.
Newsletter Challange Important Right now the biggest challenge is to save List of traps in the Saw film series from deletion. There are two things that can be done. First you can go to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traps in the Saw film series (3rd nomination) and voice your argument as to why it should be kept. Important: read over Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Saying stuff like "Saw rules, it should be kept" will not help at all. Just as important: improving the article so it has a fighting chance. I.E. Focus less on plot of the films but more "real world" information...I.E. the traps' impact on popular culture, reception they may have received, cited comparisions and allusions to actual devices (just pulling comparisions out of thin air would be original research. Try to make the character articles more encyclopedic by making them less in-universe. See Jigsaw and Amanda's articles for guidance. Also see Jason Voorhees, which is a featured article. (Obviously there is more information on Jason available than the Saw characters, but it is worth looking at to see what's considered the best of the best.) Because of the nature of the series, poorly written articles could be considered 'deletion-bait' and 'cruft'...the better written the articles, the less likely this would happen. Some of the plot articles seem to be overtly long. Without bowdlerizing them, maybe we could try to make them a bit shorter and concise. Try to invite more members to this project. If you know any Saw fans who are good with computers, invite them to Wikipedia. The more the merrier.

--CyberGhostface (talk) 20:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films October 2008 Newsletter

The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pazuzu.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pazuzu.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter

The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films December 2008 Newsletter

The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:31, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror needs your help

Enter Movie/Archive 1 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 00:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter

The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - February 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Arnie

Do we even have evidence that the T-800 is a speaking role? The consensus is that he shows up to fight Marcus while clever camera angles hide his face from time to time - as well as Kickinger's nudity - for the sake of budget. It's probable that when Arnold visited the set he was just being friendly, because apparently the T-800's CG face will be modelled on his 1984 visage. Alientraveller (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, there was that LatinoReview source. Plus, Moritz Borman kept avoiding the question of whether Arnold would provide his voice or not. Enter Movie (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Well that's called secrecy, and I know LR isn't exactly reliable. Still, I guess we could keep both of them there until we know if it's like Benjamin Button, where Pitt was the driving force behind the performance, or Watchmen, where an actor wears makeup to resemble Nixon. Alientraveller (talk) 11:20, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - March 2009

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter

The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:06, 2 March 2009 (UTC)