User talk:Enemyofjokes

Welcome!

Hello, Enemyofjokes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Enemyofjokes! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 12:55, Tuesday, May 15, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Thank you[edit]

Hi Enemyofjokes, and thank you for your contributions! I noticed your article National Front for the Family and I think it’s a good candidate for Did You Know. DYK is the easiest and funnest way to get your creation on to the Main Page and in front of the eyeballs of 17 million people. Learn all about it here "DYK for Newbies." I'd like to take this opportunity to invite you to join other people who enjoy editing conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where you can can meet new colleagues and get answers to burning questions. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 00:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saba Ahmed for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saba Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saba Ahmed until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that in this edit to John H. Cox, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removing well sourced content, to promote something[edit]

Hello, I'm Jytdog. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Himalayan salt have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning[edit]

Your recent editing history at Himalayan salt shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 18:13, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not getting paid to promote Himalayan salt. Are you getting to promote whatever you're editing? My first edit removed a source to a webpage that linked to Snopes. That same article by Snopeswas already cited by the wikipedia article, so I figured it was superfluous. "Himalayan salt lamps are marketed as 'natural ionizers' with their makers claiming that by emitting negatively charged ions, they have health benefits such as reduced anxiety, improved sleep, increased energy, etc. But, it's a light bulb in a block of rock salt. Nothing is emitted. For a full scientific explanation behind the ridiculousness in the "science" behind Himalayan salt lamps, read here." My third edit was to align the sentence with the sources. "Numerous health claims have been made concerning himalayan salt, but there is no scientific evidence that it is healthier than common table salt; such claims are considered pseudoscience." Yet the Snopes article, and the American Council on Science and Health article are both focused on salt lamps, which aren't meant to be eaten (as far as I know) like table salt.Enemyofjokes (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say anything about you being paid to promote himalayan salt. People remove negative content for all kinds of reasons; the effect is promotion.

I am not sure you are aware that the part of the article above the table of contents (what we call the "lead") summarizes the part below the table of contents (the body). This is described in WP:LEAD. In a short article like this one, the result will be a feeling of repetition. Because of that, I often remove sections from a short page like this so that there is no lead, but there are some people who (for some reason) feel that sections are very important and restore them....

The use of himalayan salt as seasoning is discussed in the body of the article. Jytdog (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But this is not the place to discuss content. The purpose of the notice above, is to let you know that the correct thing to do if you make a change and it is reverted, is to open a discussion with the other person on the article talk page, and work it out. Please do that in the future. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to take this to the Wikipedia article's talk page? You are one of the two who reverted my edits, so you must care. The article's body doesn't just discuss Himalayan salt as seasoning. It also discusses Himalayan salt lamps. My edit, which you removed, was to make the sentence in the lead more accurate taking this into account.Enemyofjokes (talk) 18:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If there is anything about your initial edits that you still want to address, you can open a discussion at the talk page. Jytdog (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Enemyofjokes. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]