User talk:Emiya1980/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation link notification for June 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Ford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John S. Gray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cite video game[edit]

You see. When writing video game references we need to make them fully detailed. See the template cite video game. Fate/stay night was never licensed for English releases so quotes can also be get from English patches made by fans. As a result, the quote is pointless. Instead, in order to also avoid WP:Undue weight, we just write the level in which the reference takes place into. See Shirou Emiya's article as an example. Rather than using quote, we use instead the day in which something happens in the game or possible sequence which Type-Moon often names. Still, about character lists try not to in overdetails when editing section and focus only on major points. Happy editing.Tintor2 (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, in case you are interested, some characters from the franchise could obtain their own article but only if they wp:notability. For this they need to have real world information to balance the fictional one. Asking to have as much as Shirou and Saber is pushing so in case you want to give Kotomine an article it might be possible if you find reviews of the first Fate/stay night anime or the Zero prequel. However, it might be difficult. The only other two characters I imagine being able to have their own articles are Waver and Illya since they got their own spinoff so reviews might be possible. In the case of Rider I merged her article since it barely had real world information. Try using Sakura or Kiritsugu as examples to follow in case you are interested. There was a Russian user who managed to add some creation info but he is busy. The type moon wiki has access to multiple books but I've never checked them carefully. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 16:44, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yoshijirō Umezu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Pacific War shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Edit warring against the results of a RfC which concluded several months ago and which you participated in is awful conduct. Please stop this. Nick-D (talk) 10:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just some attention for a talk page[edit]

Hi, just since you were active on the Pacific War Talk page before, I thought you might be interested in a proposal here: Talk:Empire of Japan#Predecessors and Successors --Havsjö (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Campaignbox Battle of Albert (1916) has been accepted[edit]

Template:Campaignbox Battle of Albert (1916), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Attack at Fromelles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Michael (June 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The submission appears to be blank apart from some unusual mark-up and a template. If this is test edit please do not do this.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Eagleash (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Operation Michael (June 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT BLANK SUBMISSIONS. BLANK DRAFTS THAT ARE NOT IMPROVED WILL BE REJECTED.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
WikiAviator (talk) 04:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had brief discussion on WikiAviator's talk page about this. Apparently AfC only deal with articles and not with templates. I have taken the liberty of creating your template. You'll find it at Template:Campaignbox Operation Michael. It's missing documentation. Beyond My Ken (talk) 12:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ninja Resurrection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Himmler[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Heinrich Himmler; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • The infobox image you keep trying to replace has been in the aritlc efor wuite a long time. Enoguh that you need to obtain a consensus on the talk page before you remove it. If you contonue to edit wwar, you will be reported. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Beyond My Ken: First off, the change to the present image hasn’t been there for a long time. It’s been in place for barely over a week. I should know, I was the one who originally made the change.
Secondly, holding you to to the same standards as you hold other editors is hardly what I would characterize as edit-warring. In one page, you prevented me from uploading a cropped image on the grounds that it reduced the resolution of the original image. However, when I tried to prevent the same thing from happening on Heinrich Himmler based on this explanation, you reverted my changes. If you think my change is unproductive, you should at least say why. Otherwise, we need to hold a vote among the Wikipedia community on Himmler’s talk page. Is that fair? Emiya1980 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hideki Tojo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Genro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dennis Weatherstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lewis Preston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JPMorgan Chase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Thompson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tsar Nicholas II[edit]

Greetings Emiya1980, Could you stop changing the end of the 1st paragraph on Nicholas II's article? It's fine how it was, and there's no need for you to push negative opinions, as sources confirm Nicholas II was a capable ruler. The article went by the Neutral Point of View (NPOW) rule, and you have been unfortunately been involved in edit wars previously. Also, there's no need to make multiple edits on the same article in a short period of time, you can do them at once, and not spam the edit history page, and you keep undoing anything someone else types. I strongly suggest you don't use blogs as sources as they are not academic/scholarly sources, an ergo unreliable. You should read the main rules more closely here. --Joker0002710 (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Joker0002710[reply]

Joker0002710 The categorization of Nicholas II as a capable ruler is a minority viewpoint which is heavily outweighed by the majority of historians as well as the evidence set forth in the article. Moreover, if you read the sources I used, they are not blogs but vetted works by verified scholars. I have been more than accommodating in trying to alter my words to not be overly negative of Nicholas without changing the consensus held by most historians. You, on the other hand, have dismissed my sources as that of blog gossip and not made any changes to your claims about Nicholas being a "good administrator" when the vast wealth of scholarly research says otherwise. If you want to reach a middle ground, let's take this to the talk page. Otherwise stop reverting my edits while pointing to the same two sources which clearly represent outlier views on the subject. Emiya1980 (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emiya: Given the boiled down characterizations, I can ascribe to A - well-intentioned but poor ruler. I base my assessment on that of my father who served in the Russian Army under Nicholas II during WW-I.Moryak (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moryak Thank you for sharing your opinion on how Nicholas II should be characterized in the lead. However, if it is to be counted in the ongoing discussion over on Nicholas's discussion page, you should post your thoughts there not here. Just a friendly nudge in the right direction.Emiya1980 (talk) 01:33, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing s-end templates[edit]

Hi. Two of your recent edits, adding "succession boxes" at the bottom of Irving S. Olds and Roger Blough, were missing the {{S-end}} that is necessary after the last entry (usually an {{S-aft}}). In other words, the succession box should start with an {{S-start}} and end with an {{S-end}}. I've corrected those two at Special:Diff/980577096 and Special:Diff/980577199. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 08:30, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Ley, 1st Earl of Marlborough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Operation Michael[edit]

Hello, Emiya1980. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Operation Michael".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Payne Whitney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democrat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saigō Jūdō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meiji.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Foster Dulles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mohammed Farrah Aidid.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Mohammed Farrah Aidid.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Ytoyoda I received your message about Mohammed Farrah Aidid. Please keep in mind that even in cases you believe are warranting speedy deletion, I still am entitled 7 days after notice to offer a counterargument or correct any problems raised with the image to prevent its deletion (as can be read here). I have since reuploaded the image. If you want to place a deletion notice on the image, you may do so BUT NOT without deleting it before the passage of 7 days. Thank you for your consideration regarding this matter. Emiya1980 (talk) 02:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please see WP:F7. The image was a Getty Images photo, and since it was used merely to identify the subject of the article and the image itself was not a subject of discussion or commentary, it failed WP:NFCC#2 and was subject to immediate deletion. F7 deletions do not require a 7-day wait. If you disagree, please don’t re-upload. Instead, please state your reasons for undeletion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ytoyoda I have placed a {{subst:Dfu}} tag on the page. That gives me seven days to make a counterargument or correct based on the link you just sent me. Do not delete until then. Emiya1980 (talk) 04:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that just adds another speedy deletion tag to the image and won’t stop the F7 deletion. You should instead follow the instructions on the template and hit the “contest” button and explain your rationale for why the image does not meet the speedy deletion criteria. Keep in mind though, that Getty Images is explicitly mentioned as a commercial agency whose work should not be used except to discuss the images themselves. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ogden Mills "Dinny" Phipps.jpeg[edit]

File:Ogden Mills "Dinny" Phipps.jpeg has the same issue as the above image and you can contest on the talk page. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Wilhelm II, German Emperor does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --Renat 10:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Viktor Grishin.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Viktor Grishin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ernest Woodruff.jpeg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ernest Woodruff.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Henry S. Morgan.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Henry S. Morgan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stephen A.D. Greaves.png[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stephen A.D. Greaves.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leon Godchaux.jpeg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leon Godchaux.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emiya1980/Archive_2&oldid=1137558197"