User talk:Editwikigu

Editwikigu, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Editwikigu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 17:03, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 17:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, First person visited all countries[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, First person visited all countries. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Kashi Samaddar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Kashi Samaddar – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Everymorning talk 18:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kashi Samaddar India.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Kashi Samaddar India.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed the error of Kashi Samaddar.jpg but could not fix. I was still trying but saw that you have deleted it. Request that you resize the photo and put. Regards Editwikigu (Editwikigu (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2015 (UTC))[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at May 27, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:09, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kashi Samaddar with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 16:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kashi Samaddar India.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Kashi Samaddar India.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Image deleted already, there should be no text for a non-existent image

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 18:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of people by number of countries visited. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read[edit]

Can you please read Help:Referencing for beginners. All the references you are adding are formatted incorrectly. Let me know if you need more help after reading this.
Stop promoting Kashi Samaddar. This is an encyclopedia, not Facebook.

Thank you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:36, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

If you keep vandalizing Wikipedia you are going to be blocked from editing privileges. Quis separabit? 11:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at List of people by number of countries visited, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at May 27. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:04, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help me, please! Kashi Samaddar article[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have studied, edited & improved Kashi Samaddar with proper links but some one or two retaining mistakes, seems intentional. For example:

- Date Of World Record is 27th May 2008 but half truth with May 2008 is put.

- Error report of Daily Mail "All 201" Countries are maintained forcefully favoring Mr Graham Hughes who got Guinness Certificate for 193 Countries, not 201.Mr Samaddar objected to the error and this errors should not be part of his article.

- "List of people visited by number of Countries" is tagged on Kashi when Mr Bown & Mr Chris have no certificate from Guinness or others (They just have one or two news paper articles as given to understand to Journalists. Without certificate, Truth is in question? and wikipedia must avoid contradictory news for Truth.

- Kashi Samaddar is important person with four prestigious World Records including the "First person visited all Countries at South Sudan on 09th July 2011 & Kosovo on 27th May 2008" recognized by World bodies including Guinness & covered around the World, but at Wikipedia, due to mistakes of few editors, kepping with errors for over 14 months- they are spoiling good image of Wikipedia.

- Kashi Samaddar Linkedin profile says that he is a Business Executive turned Adventurer and not a Businessman but error news of Daily Mail is forced on him ignoring other media & Truth.

In fact, I can write his whole biography (Would be large) but doubt that some one at wikipedia will erase as Vandalism. Kindly look into the matter and put corrected version by me or advise.

Please help me with... Editwikigu (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you have some trustworthy reference, please put it. DO NOT just copy it from somewhere and paste that to article. Read it and they type it. Where there should be citations, add it. It doesn't matter how much you know until it can't be found in the citations.

Just don't copy paste.Content that violates any copyrights will be deleted. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone—subject to certain terms and conditions.
Properly cite it.

aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 17:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have an adventure![edit]

I advice you to go through this before editing anything further. Learn editing with The Wikipedia Adventure!
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 17:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing[edit]

Hi, you are not formatting references properly. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for information on how to do it properly. You must not use double braces ''{{'' and ''}}'', they do not do what you think they do. Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 07:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Help:Referencing for beginners for information on how to reference properly, there is more to it than just pasting a URL between <ref> and </ref>. Look at Template:Cite news and Template:Cite web as well. Thank you YSSYguy (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Editwikigu:

Let me see if I can explain referencing a little bit. I see you've been told not to simply write the URL between two sets of curly brackets, like this: <ref>{{http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modi-govt-has-no-intention-to-bring-black-money-Ram-Jethmalani/articleshow/46372130.cms}}</ref> What you're doing now, a bare URL - <ref>http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modi-govt-has-no-intention-to-bring-black-money-Ram-Jethmalani/articleshow/46372130.cms</ref> - is better. It would be a little better yet if you put square brackets around the URL: <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modi-govt-has-no-intention-to-bring-black-money-Ram-Jethmalani/articleshow/46372130.cms]</ref>; that makes a blue number, and looks neater. However, it is much better if you give more information than just the URL. That can be done in two ways. One is to type out the information, with the URL followed by the article title within square brackets: <ref>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modi-govt-has-no-intention-to-bring-black-money-Ram-Jethmalani/articleshow/46372130.cms "Modi govt has no intention to bring black money: Ram Jethmalani"], ''Times of India'', 25 February 2015</ref>. (I have also italicised the name of the newspaper and put italics on the article title/headline, as these are conventional punctuation. I don't see a news agency or a reporter named as author of the article; if there had been one, I would have put that name first.) The other is to use citation templates; they are the things that have double curly brackets around them. There are several, listed here. They are not mandatory, and many people who use them have installed a little programme that fills them in automatically from the reference URL. Personally I find them a challenge. But if you do use them, note that the items do not all need to be filled out, and can be in any order within the template. You would probably most use "cite news", so here is the same reference done that way (I have left the fields for author and news agency blank to show you their names): <ref>{{cite news |first= |last= |agency= |title=Modi govt has no intention to bring black money: Ram Jethmalani |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Modi-govt-has-no-intention-to-bring-black-money-Ram-Jethmalani/articleshow/46372130.cms |newspaper=Times of India |date=25 February 2015 }}</ref> The output from the citation templates is in a different order than my example of just typing it in.

I hope that helps a bit? Yngvadottir (talk) 08:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kashi Samaddar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kashi Samaddar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kashi Samaddar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

I notice you have asked above about this article, so I think you should know that it has been nominated for deletion. You may want to make an argument at the discussion for why you believe the article should be kept. Note that the best argument for keeping the article is that there are many articles about him in different newspapers (and not all from the same news agency), so given what's been said higher up on this page, you should see how many more you can find. Extensive coverage in independent sources is the main way Wikipedia defines "notability". (See this page for a summary.) Yngvadottir (talk) 08:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same person?[edit]

I have to ask: are you and User:Editwikig the same person? Your account names are almost identical and you both made edits to WP:REFUND requesting that the page for Kashi Samaddar be kept. If you are, then you should only be editing under one account unless you have a valid reason for editing under two accounts (ie, one for use while editing at a public location, one for home). If this is the case then you will need to post this on both user pages and give an explanation for this. If not, then please be aware that this is considered WP:SOCKPUPPETRY and can lead to you getting blocked from editing- especially if a WP:SPI check shows that the two accounts are used by the same person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:47, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EDITWIKIGU REPLY:

I handle editwikigu only one account. Editwikig is a colleague in same office with similar Indian feelings. As I know, she started with Wikipedia before but saying will give up as too Technical but may be doing few still! You can ask her if she has not left already

I started recently, edited few and find interesting but I am still learning. Being a Journalist & Indian, I have interest and working on article Kashi Samaddar for his achievements for our Country, searching various sources, as guided by the Administrator. Should I go ahead or forget? Regards.--Editwikigu (talk) 12:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Editwikig, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. YSSYguy (talk) 06:16, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Editwikig (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 14:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pritam Ghosh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pritam Ghosh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pritam Ghosh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pritam Ghosh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pritam Ghosh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:53, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Pritam Ghosh.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Photo of Pritam Ghosh.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]