User talk:Ecoleetage/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Howdy![edit]

Oh, hello! What brings you here? Well, if you are interested in my old messages, this is the place! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for writing the Snack Boy article. How did you get inspired to do it? Did you know Terry? 8 September 2008

Masonic Congrats[edit]

What did you become, an Entered Apprentice or a Master Mason? Either way, congrats.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 04:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

I'm glad that you liked it. Hey, believe it or not, I was checking to see if you were active at the same time that you sent the message. See my brother, my mission here is to tell the stories of historic and heroic figures like Isabel Gonzalez, who for some unknown reason have been forgotten and have fallen between the cracks of history. Chao! Tony the Marine (talk) 04:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILM elections[edit]

Congratulations on running for WP:FILM coordinator! I wish you the best of luck. Remember, voting starts on September 15, so don't forget! There are a lot of old and new users awaiting your vote. Lastly, may the best man (or woman) win!

Limetolime Talk to me look what I did! 22:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Thank you for your participation at my RfA, which passed with a count of (166/43/7). I appreciate your comments and in my actions as an administrator I will endeavor to act in ways that earn your full confidence, even though I don't have it now. Cirt (talk) 01:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You doing okay?[edit]

Good to see your contribs list being up to date. You doing okay? I'm glad you're back in action. Today, I rescued two ridiculously bad articles from speedy deletion, and I was thinking of you as I did so. I am now an expert on a profane ventriloquist and a website designed for seven year old girls. Heh. Only on wikipedia. Glad you're here, Eco. Smiles and hugs and such. Keeper ǀ 76 21:54, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back on the farm[edit]

Hey Doug, I returned from my WikiBreak. One door closed rather abruptly (my failed RfA), but another opened unexpectedly (a movie audition that was successful, go figure). I just added a pair of new Ag articles for the WikiProject: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (a redlinked title) and Daron Joffe (a bright young organic farming leader). More to follow. Hope all is well. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:34, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you're back! Being an admin isn't all it's cracked up to be. You're a damned good editor, whereas I do my share of copyediting but don't really write much – I do a lot of deleting and moving discussions and fixing cut and paste moves and commenting on policy, but I don't write articles. Work on your core competency and try to get more articles to GA or FA status for now. --Doug.(talk contribs) 01:13, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The farm is certainly an interesting way to characterize it... or so it feels at times. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 01:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think I'd choose this farm. TravellingCari 02:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WB, partially copied from my own talk. Welcome back! I'm sorry I haven't answered your e-mail. These past two and this coming week are insane. Opening of the arts season. Thanks so much for helping out here! also your subject here got Down on the Farm in my head. For all the songs that are blue linked, that one well should be. TravellingCari

Not too familiar with Phish's work. Just had a squiz at your new article, love the Larry hook. Speaking of Waterbury, if you're familiar with the area, Timexpo. I wrote that after driving back from Boston and spotting it while stuck in traffic. TravellingCari 02:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back![edit]

I emailed you a few times but I'm not sure if any of them got through because I didn't get any replies... but it's good to see you back. Hopefully I can get more active soon. :) Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 03:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, it's great to have you back. I haven't been able to look over DYK for a while because I'm quite busy in college, but I might have some more free time this weekend if I'm lucky. Anyway, great to see you around again... :) Thingg 04:11, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I got a few emails from you and replied, though something tells me that they didn't come through (I sent myself some school assignments and didn't receive them). I'm not sure why it's like that but... whatever. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African cinema[edit]

Great work, great to see you back after your much needed break. I've done a fair bit of work on African cinema myself and created the film lists and Cinema of Kenya. Note. Use Category:Burkinabé films not Cinema of Burkina Faso. I'll make a cinema template to use in the articles. Also note List of Burkinabé films, if you could link the films on there and blue link a few that would be great. If you want a list of some notable Africa films that are missing see List of FESPACO award winners. Theres a good mix of countries in there. The Bald One White cat 09:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be a coicidence that the director of that film, Dani Kouyaté, his father, Sotigui Kouyaté, and his first film, Keïta! l'Héritage du griot were all DYKs by me? Great job on this--by the way, I recently started Ben Diogaye Beye, a Senegalese filmmaker and nominated it for DYK. As you can see, I recently received the 50 DYK medal. I'm trying to keep up with you! Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed] 10:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, its a good when things are connected too. Congrats also on your 50 DYK. One thing though note the diff on here. Just needed a cast section which should appear on all articles and some tweaking to the categories. Other than that great new article! Its s hame we can't expand some of the 1910s silent shorts in the same way! The Bald One White cat 20:50, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have a request. Could you start an article on the Cinema of Senegal? The Bald One White cat 20:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yay![edit]

Excellent to see you back, mate! And that's damn fast, too; i've only managed to get one up (although in my defence I am working on a Featured list). Ironholds 10:36, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections – voting now open![edit]

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Resilient Barnstar
Hi Eco, Good to see you bouncing back and writing more fine articles... Johnfos (talk) 01:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of request for deletion of editor Ecoleetage :)[edit]

Ecoleetage, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion#{{BASEPAGENAME}} and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the nomination (unless you wish not to participate); such removal will not end the deletion discussion (actually it will). Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :).

No matter what happens, (you getting deleted and all), I'm seriously glad to see you back to your good form. I like what you do here, even the "wrong queue" stuff :-). If, no strike that, when, you are giving your Oscar acceptance speech, I very much want you to say "and thank you to 'the Keeper of Wikipedia' for keeping that website sane". I'll have an aneurysm and die a happy and fulfilled man. You rock eco, don't let anyone convince you otherwise. You are so much better off than us lowly, red-tape bound, bureaucracy entrenched, politically correct admins, honest to goodness. Keeper ǀ 76 20:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Awwwwwww, thanks! Actually, I am reminded of the Leslie Bricusse-Anthony Newley song: "I'm gonna build a mountain, from a little hill /I'm gonna build a mountain, least I hope I will. / I'm gonna build a mountain, I'm gonna build it high / I don't know how Im gonna do it, only know I'm gonna try." (I'd go further, but those pesky copyright bots would probably show up.) More fun stuff to follow... :) Ecoleetage (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't ask me why I'm stalking your talk page, but could you please tell me who the heck are Leslie Bricusse-Anthony Newley? Oh, and they are copyright robots. Always be politically correct, if you want to go anywhere in life. :) Your friend Eddy of the wiki[citation needed] 21:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Who the heck are Leslie Bricusse-Anthony Newley?" Stop the world...I want to get off! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 21:24, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage. I would like to thank you for your support in my RfA and the confidence expressed thereby. It is very much appreciated. :) The RfA was closed as successful with 73 supports, 3 opposes and 4 neutral. I would especially like to thank WBOSITG for nominating me. Best wishes and thanks again, —αἰτίας discussion 22:34, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bokassa page[edit]

Uh-thanls,though I started it only half an hour ago. --New Babylon 2 (talk) 12:12, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re. RfB comments[edit]

Ecoleetage, I am glad you came to my talk page about this. I probably will not release your e-mails or allow access to them by third parties, as I do not want this situation to escalate and I do not wish to spoil your wiki-experience. However, I can no longer trust you, or even assume good faith on your part. What you did at my RfB, after the e-mails, was unimaginably ugly. Húsönd 17:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn my comments and my participation from your RfB. It pains me to see that you repeated my RfA error by mistaking opinion and commentary on content for a personal attack. I believe that my concerns were valid and I had a right, as a Wikipedia editor, to express why I felt there were problems with the RfB. However, it was not a personal attack in any way, shape, or form, and I am genuinely sorry that you felt there was some malicious motive in my !vote. The idea of hurting anybody is wholly antithetical to the "real" me -- I could vent over frustration, as anyone does. But to genuinely hurt anyone? If I were that type of person, I would have offed myself years ago. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think, Husond, that it is rather unfair and ugly of you to say that you cannot trust Eco anymore. Eco's comments were fair and honest, and were valid no matter what the e-mails say. I am withdrawing my support from your RfB because of your badgering of perfectly valid opposes such as Eco and your blackmail. The word probably also concerns me. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 21:51, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

El Salvador[edit]

Hey have a read of Fuerzas Populares de Liberación Farabundo Martí. Interesting stuff isn't it. The shady Salvadoran underworld. God I love Latin American history. It is just so dark and corrupt! The Bald One White cat 21:38, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Just remember though that whatever you have done as implied above, I'm not up what was said, neither do I want to know, but you still remain a respectable editor in my book. It was unfortunate what happened, but some things don't work out and even the greatest of people sometimes say things out of context or that they later regret, we are ony human after all. I am always a keen believer that people should move on and forget about it and look to the future and find new ways to enjoy life and have fun. Best The Bald One White cat 22:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I'm literally heading out the door, but I will the second I get back (if I'm in a right state of mind, that is). Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I emailed you; hopefully it went through. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 22:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Does this mean I have to delete the Grand Lodge article again? :P Good work though! It actually looks like an article now. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 03:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Updated DYK query On 20 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting your help[edit]

Eco, please take a look at my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture#Need help with an unusual article. If you can help with this I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Also, if you're interested in helping out with creating some taxoboxes let me know, those have been on the back burner long enough.--Doug.(talk contribs) 03:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Lodge of Virginia[edit]

On behalf of the Freemasonry Project, thank you for the stub. I especially like the fact that you cite more than just the GLV website (an all too common flaw for many articles on Grand Lodges). This is a key step towards establishing notability. I am sure that there are people who can help it grow... but don't wait for them. Keep researching, and add to it yourself. Again, thanks. Blueboar (talk) 01:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Good Humour![edit]

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For a particularly amusing opinion (one that made me laugh, anyway) in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burgers plot. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Walls of Sand[edit]

Updated DYK query On 22 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Walls of Sand, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 05:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sia, le rêve du python, Mattatuck Museum Arts and History Center[edit]

Updated DYK query On 22 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles Sia, le rêve du python, and Mattatuck Museum Arts and History Center, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 10:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your Welcome note. LiveChocolate (talk) 21:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing my guestbook[edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for signing my guestbook. LAAFan

The Dreamers (unfinished film)[edit]

Updated DYK query On 23 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Dreamers (unfinished film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 01:57, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy in London[edit]

Updated DYK query On 23 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lucy in London, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 23 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brandon Curry, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Jordan Contribs 12:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars marathon[edit]

Could you please elaborate as to why the article that I have created (which concerns a relevant subject) has been slapped with a notice? I feel deeply offended at this. --Bravo Plantation (talk) 15:50, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The article was tagged (not slapped – I’m not Moe Howard) because I felt it did not meet Wikipedia’s requirements for notability, particularly in regard to WP:RS. I could be mistaken, of course, which is why I put it up for AfD instead of trying to get it erased with a Speedy Delete tag. With AfD, the community can provide consensus on the article’s merits. If you can find references to back your claims of notability, that will help immensely. Please don’t take offence – any fan of Bruce Forsyth and the Two Ronnies obviously has good judgment, so there is an excellent chance you will come out ahead. Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining :) --Bravo Plantation (talk) 16:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, Mr Ecoleetage! Long time no... um... write? I've edited the Star Wars marathon giving a couple of sources (from the BBC and Fox news among others) and wondered if you still wanted to proceed with the AfD? Cheers. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 16:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added some more references to the Star Wars marathon mentioning the watch-all-the-films-together-on-DVD phenomenon as well as the official marathons. An interesting idea that came up from one site I researched on was to watch Episode IV, followed by Episode V, then to watch Episodes I, II and III as a flashback before finishing with Episode VI! -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 13:02, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Portugese language task force[edit]

I wondered if you'd be interested in either Latin American task force and Portugese language task force? See WT:FILMS. The Bald One White cat 17:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ecoleetage[edit]

Thank you for supporting my RfA nomination, Ecoleetage. And thanks as well for the congratulatory note you left on my talk page. I appreciate the confidence. Cbl62 (talk) 06:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 24 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alibi Bye Bye, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Jordan Contribs 09:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens it was a name I'd heard of, and a quick Google assured me that it was that guy and he is notable (BBC has references for example). But the first draft did barely assert notability so I don't think the tag was wrong – just a bit hasty maybe. I didn't even see it was you who'd placed the tag to be honest. No worries. Pedro :  Chat  13:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Touched![edit]

I am deeply touched by the barnstar you have awarded me. Thank you, but it was totally unnecessary: all in the line of duty. I really enjoyed your article. Please visit Carmel Agrexco: I have added your Strawberry Fields (documentary film) as a "See also" there. Best, --Zlerman (talk) 15:21, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I dug as fast as I could..... Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 18:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK 24/9[edit]

Updated DYK query On 24 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Daron Joffe, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 18:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Immortal Story DYK[edit]

Updated DYK query On 25 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Immortal Story, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:42, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shoveling snow?[edit]

I closed that Steve Brown afd. Any yo-yo would probably have called that one a snowball keep. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 16:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Many thanks for the kind gesture. AniMate 20:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I look at the article you asked about, but just couldn't manage any significant motivation. Sorry. If you have any really bizarre and obscure articles you need help with, I'm always interested. AniMate 04:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a non-observant member of the tribe. So, thank you. AniMate 11:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Alice[edit]

Thanks!--CyberGhostface (talk) 02:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks, Eco, for your kind words. Much appreciated. Maias (talk) 00:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work[edit]

Warkop is a problem and I appreciate you are doing good work – but I have a sneaking suspicion that I might have been able to make it an article with valid N and V and RS item but might take longer than can be coped with in the Afd process – however if it has been through and keeps reapparing maybe it is not worth working on – just that there are so few around to actually defend any aspect of the indonesian porject at the moment – cheers SatuSuro 02:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.[edit]

Thanks for your comment. I really appreciate it, since I'm new to Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Portalcake (talkcontribs) 11:09, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA[edit]

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

I was looking forward to one of those wrong queue jokes. :) On the FAC part: I probably did act a bit dickish at the FAC of 1964 Gabon coup d'etat because I thought my hard work was not being appreciated. I knew that there would be opposition because of Karanacs, even though we made up afterward and I struck my vote. However, I do think saying that I consider Wikipedia a MMOPRG and all of Badger Drink's oppose were unnecessary (yes i still do police civility:)) On a completely unrelated note could you weigh in at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paul Gondjout? the editorofthewiki (talk/contribs/editor review) 20:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kissy Simmons[edit]

Hi Eco, I'm just curious re here. Which sources didn't you think were reliable? I can't find problems with any of them. Did you mean BroadwayWorld? There's no issue there so as I can tell. Hope you're having a good weekend playing in the rain! TravellingCari 21:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh I disagree. This is why I also tend to stay out of Broadway discussions. BroadwayWorld is often the main reliable source for casting and show announcements. While news can be submitted, there is editorial control (apart from forums, of course). Playbill I think you have only hald of it. While the shows provide the center pages, they have no control over the articles. Each show only owns ~8 pages per issue for their show while Playbill the magazine owns and controls the rest of the real estate. Show, casting, etc. announcements may be included there but they're written by Playbill staff so there is oversight. TravellingCari 00:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, I do't know too much about the Hollywood side, I'm far more familiar with the New York media. While there is some COI inherent in the industry, I think there's enough neutrality. I think a lot of bit actors are dubious but I let it go. It's like professors, and schools. Sometimes it's easier. TravellingCari 01:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Incorrect deletion summary[edit]

Yes, I definitely understand that you didn't have anything to do with that article, and were the person reporting it for deletion. The problem with the summary was caused by the software, and probably happens occasionally here. Thanks for reporting the real creator of the article. Academic Challenger (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator work[edit]

Hello, it's a pleasure to meet you! I'm jealous that you have a flexible schedule; I certainly don't have that during the week. I look forward to working with you, though I will probably be limiting myself to community and coordinator discussions for the next few months. If you want to get involved right away as a coordinator, you may be interested in checking out the 0.7 announcement Nehrams2020 was discussing with me right above your first message to me. I'll see you on the talk pages! :) —Erik (talkcontrib) – 03:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on becoming one of the project's coordinators. I'd recommend that you add the main coordinator page to your watchlist so that you can join in on the discussions as they arise. I'm sure Girolamo will have some main points of discussion in the coming days (he's busy for the next few). Right now, I think the main thing our project should be focusing on is the 0.7 release, which Girolamo and I have been working on fine-tuning. We're trying to set up a drive to get the project's members to work on choosing reliable revisions for the release, but we just need to hammer out the details first. Anyway, welcome, and if you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mitcheminteractive[edit]

Thanks for your help in cleaning up after this spammer. For some reason, I took a look at all his contributions and saw he was wreaking havoc all across Wikipedia. I've reported him to WP:AIV for assistance. --McDoobAU93 (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for a week. Tan | 39 17:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Epidexipteryx[edit]

Thanks. :) Proud to help out. :D Abyssal (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cacela Velha[edit]

Updated DYK query On 30 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cacela Velha, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 08:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for the kind message. I just created a bunch of really short stubs, but eventually they would be evolved to a status for DYK qualities. I also appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. Best regards.--Caspian blue (talk) 12:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Strawberry Fields (2006 film)[edit]

Updated DYK query On 30 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Strawberry Fields (2006 film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Keep up the good work! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 14:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK congrats[edit]

Thanks! I'm not yet up to your level, but I'm churning out articles and DYK's at a pretty good rate. How go things at your end of the wiki? Haven't spoken to you for ages. Ironholds 15:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On-wiki: Fairly good, DYK's as you can see and, thanks to by new access to a law-library, i'm looking to move the Court of Common Pleas article up to GA; I've got a not-finished copy in my sandbox1 if you'd like to compare. Also odd AfD's and getting a sockpuppeteer banned (again), thank god (causing a lot of trouble around the Pure Reason Revolution article). Off-wiki: Back at uni and liking the studies, although not the two days of wiki-withdrawal before my internet got connected. Ironholds 15:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up – there is a new one click method to leave the notices on the User's talk pages, so I stupidly assumed it also took care of the article talk pages. They are all done now (by hand) and I thank you for catching my mistake, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Eco, your thread you started is exactly what I needed today. I've been feeling bummed (I really am mostly leaving), and I've had some very hearty laughs at the songs my stalkers have come up with. Thanks for the thread eco, be well. I hope things are going well with your gig, looking forward to seeing your name in lights. Of course, I don't know your name, but I think I'll recognize you :-). During your oscar speech, I demand that you give a shout out to "keeper76 of the Wikipedia"....I'll be on the couch laughing my buttocks off, and my wife won't know why (she doesn't know my username). Cheers friend, be well Keeper ǀ 76 21:31, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Keeper -- if you are watching here (since I think you are my only TPS), be well and remember that you can always drop me a line if you ever feel bummed and need a laugh. I am e-mail enabled, so you are welcome to say Hi away from the Wiki-eyeballs. Be well, my friend. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How could you forget me? I sniff don't think I'm going to see your movie anymore, Eco sniff sniff sniff'. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 00:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Erik, you're watching this page, too? If I knew you were coming, I'd have baked a cake! Ecoleetage (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chocolate or vanilla? Or both? Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 00:46, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Upside down cake! My pastry looks like a Frank Gehry nightmare, so I call everything upside down cake. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:48, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see that you're active[edit]

I'm really happy to see you around. We need more people like you here. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Play[edit]

Awesome! Did you know she has a shrine here as well, see the pic in Battery Park. TravellingCari 15:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The redlink there inspired me to do so me stub writing: Hope Garden o:) TravellingCari 16:16, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have mu moments of productivity. I'm clearing out the backlog again, flooding AfD as per usual o:) TravellingCari 16:35, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films September 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The September 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the relevant sections again!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Mad Adventures of Bobamnertiopsis[edit]

Yay, you're back! I had actually expected your hiatus to be longer than that, but I'm certainly not disappointed that you're back on Wikipedia now! So, what have I been doing? Not enough, honestly. Thanks to a little (big) thing called school, my capacity for writing and editing has been diminished. I have far less time than I'd like, but I try to edit when I can. I helped my friend EnjoiNico (a real, live friend whom I know in the physical world) get an article he was slaving over to GA status: No Age. Other than that, my edits have been inconsequential. I've was was working on Tropical Storms and hurricanes around the time you left, but that phase went poof. Hopefully, I'll get in the swing/loop of writing again. (I haven't had a DYK since June!) I'm super-glad to see that you're back! Cheerio! -BobAmnertiopsisChatMe! 02:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

A belated congratulations for your election as a film coordinator. I certainly look forward to working with you. FWiW, I recently had a series of publishing deadlines to meet so my attention was diverted of late, but I will be coming back "on line" little by little. Bzuk (talk) 00:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Foxy Loxy's RfA[edit]

Hello, this message is to inform you that User:Foxy Loxy has restarted their RfA. The new discussion is located at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Foxy Loxy 2. GlassCobra 10:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ICER Brands, LLC[edit]

Dmanzor (talk) 14:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)HI, I am curious as to why you deleted the "ICER Brands, LLC" Page? It includes the histories longevity, and credible companies that the they provide marketing and Product development serrvices for. It is relevant because the brands which they work with are large international brand (i.e- Apple Bottoms.. which doies 300mil + at retail in the US, as well as millions more intyernationally). ICER owns the sole licensing rights to that company, as well as others. The article was written in a very neutral context as well. Please tell me what else needs to be done to repost this page without it being deleted.[reply]

Thanks

Dmanzor (talk) 15:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC) Hi i had completely revised the article, and there was nothing about it that sounded as if it were advertising. I simply wanted to put the information about the company- the history, what it does, who they work with, etc. I will repost it now, I would appreciate it if you could please take a look, and see what you can do in order to help me avoid having it deleted, and remove the flag for "speddy deletion"[reply]

Thanks!

Dmanzor (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC) hi my Icer Brands page was deleted again! I inlcuded factual information, history, relevance, and external sources to back up stuff. BUt it is listed under speedy deletion still, and as such, everytime i post it gets deleted. How can i avoid this??[reply]

Dmanzor (talk) 16:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Hi I still havent received a reply from you regarding what to do about my page that you deleted. You were very quick in deleting... but I have written you regarding your deletion a few days ago and you have yet to offer me any advice. Im sure that your intent is just to make wikipedia a great informative environment, so please respond to my threads, as I would like to repost my ICER Brands, LLC page, in the proper manner so that you allow it to stay up, and remove the "speedy deltion tag"[reply]

thanks for your help.

I have already answered your query (please see your talk page for the message). I cannot help you -- please speak with the admin who was responsible for the article's deletion, User:Akradecki. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wescorp Energy Inc.[edit]

I made some style edits to Wescorp Energy Inc.. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wescorp Energy Inc. -- Eastmain (talk) 19:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes less is more[edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
I award you this editor's Barnstar for your terrific work in cleaning up Western Virginia Land Trust, where you have shown that by removing the kruft an artcle may become a beacon for all of Wikipedia Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, darn it, I got beaten to it. Yes, well done, Ecoleetage. Due to your work on the article, I have now offered to withdraw the deletion nomination. I really wasn't expecting that discussion to do anything other than snowball towards deletion, but your work has convinced me there are people willing to work on it other than the spammers. Well done, and keep up the good work! Hersfold (t/a/c) 20:45, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia NAC[edit]

I don't see why not. I'll close it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 01:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You did good work. If its a one-man operation, WP:Corp won't apply, but you'll still be fighting a battle. You're going to have to depend on it being notable for where it is and what it does, as it sure ain't Random House. Perhaps the Duluth media has more to say. Is there a Duluth media? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...sorry I was busy as a 1-armed paper-hanger the last couple of days and missed the AfD ... looks like you did a lot of good work on it, and helped it get kept! BMW(drive) 11:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there my friend. Can you take a look at the massive destruction of this article ...I turned it into a disambig page. BMW(drive) 20:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

Thanks very much! :) Thingg 21:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Sleepy Time Gal[edit]

Updated DYK query On 5 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Sleepy Time Gal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 10:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paradisus Puerto Rico[edit]

To tell you the truth, In the 20 years (1970–1990) that I resided in the island, I had never heard of the place. However, I noticed that the article was created by User:Joseph Dwayne (I believe he is inactive) who happened to be one of the best editors. Still, I also noticed that the article lacks proper citation. Tony the Marine (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Great! I just wrapped up my "last" big article in Wikipedia Puerto Rican Scientists and inventors. I don't know if I told you, but my son is sending my wife and yours truely on a Pacific cruise for a week. As soon as I get back I'll get in touch with you. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To you too[edit]

The same to you, mate. Keep up the good work.

Greetings[edit]

Hi E, thanks for welcoming me. I want to be able to "add" an article in my userspace so I can edit, modify, beat up, and spruce, without having to get scorn and all that stuff. Is there any way a copy of "internet cafe" can be copied to my userspace for me to play with, but annexed so its not in "my" personal details but rather, a separate link? That way I can obsess over billions of edits without having billions peer over my shoulder and re-edit and squander my time hopelessly until I've finished it properly. Naturally, it will take me many months to do. Something like: User:Cafejunkie/Cafe and I can copy contents of article to there... Please advise how you/I can do this. CJ. --Cafejunkie (talk) 01:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Eco. I have two left thumbs but will get the hang of it one day. I hate "sandbox", I want to name any works in progress with something relevant. Here I go wish me luck! CJ --Cafejunkie (talk) 01:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edmar Bernardes da Silva[edit]

Could you please take a look at Edmar Bernardes da Silva, a Brazilian writer? The article is at AfD, and I thought I should mention it to you. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Protect request[edit]

As you left a message on his talk page, I'm inclined to see what he will do in the future. Also, you might want to explain your edits in your edit summaries. As it stands, it looks bitey and/or uncivil. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 04:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused by your comments that my attempt to maintain the proper contents of Template:OrsonWelles are "bitey and/or uncivil." Can you please be specific...just what part of my communications are bitey and/or uncivil? I have not been rude to the editor who is repeatedly claiming that a film directed by Orson Welles does not belong in a template devoted to films directed by Orson Welles. I re-reviewed my message and it seems obvious that I politely explained why he is in error in repeatedly removing the film from the template. Thank you.Ecoleetage (talk) 12:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS I also re-reviewed my edit summaries and there is absolutely nothing "bitey and/or uncivil." I would appreciate an explanation of your comments. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Explaining why you are adding the film back in is constructive. An edit summary with nothing past "Filming Othello" gives the impression of you not being open to the opinions of the other editor (who put forth why he believes it shouldn't be included). Per WP:BRD, if you're reverted, stop, then discuss. I'm not saying you intended this. I'm just pointing out how this comes across. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, calling the edits "bitey and/or uncivil" seems, on its own terms, bitey and/or uncivil -- please assume good faith before making harsh statements. Anyone who is even vaguely familiar with Orson Welles' films would realise the omission of the director's last completed film is strange -- and the argument that removing it because it is a non-fiction feature makes no sense whatsoever. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am assuming good faith. Hence why I stated that you probably didn't intend this. Remember that you're talking to a fairly new editor (who apparently has been around quite a while but hasn't edited that much), so always use your edit summaries to explain why you're doing something. If the issue is contentious, then explain in full what you are doing. Again, just putting "Filming Othello" as your edit summary isn't constructive in that kind of situation. Yes, his argument isn't very persuasive, but in that situation, turn to discussion before adding it back in. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 02:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The fact remains that I left a detailed explanation on his Talk Page (which you already know). The Edit Summary does not offer space to explain in depth why omitting a film directed by Orson Welles from a Template devoted to films directed by Orson Welles is illogical. And my explanation, I should stress, was polite (two uses of "please" and a "thank you"). Although you are explaining yourself after the fact, your initial observation was harsh and unpleasant (though I really don't care, as I am planning to rewrite the article on Welles' film of "Macbeth" -- who allowed that travesty to stay online?)Ecoleetage (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks[edit]

Thanks for "The Purple Barnstar". It's nice to be noticed. :) doncram (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton[edit]

Updated DYK query On 7 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

RyanCross (talk) 02:45, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got a thank you card![edit]

Barnstar[edit]

Oooh – thank you! It certainly stands out. Johnbod (talk) 12:32, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Check this out?[edit]

Yeah, that guy was incorrect. I reverted and added a ref to back up the "open source" statement. (heh. it actually says in the license that the code is available to anyone; I think that confirm's it's open source...) Thanks for letting me know. Thingg 12:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the guy just left a note on my talk page and I started looking deeper. I guess he was right. I found this in the FAQ:"Is Paint.NET free? Yes, Paint.NET is indeed free in the sense that we do not charge money for it." heh. oops on my part... Thingg 13:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA comments[edit]

Your RfA comments strike me as... odd. I suppose that you're trying to be funny? Only I don't get the joke. Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:10, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! To answer your observation: my RfA comments only came about because I normally arrived at those discussions at the midway point and felt I was contributing nothing of value by repeating the same “Support – great candidate” comments that 25 or 30 other editors said. The “wrong queue” comments came about just to be different, not to be funny. There is no “joke,” per se – it is just a small revolt against conformity. Of course, I only do that when I support a candidate – I never do that with oppose or neutral input, because I need to be serious in explaining why I cannot get behind a candidacy. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Best wishes. Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Thanks[edit]

Ecoleetage, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C 02:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Small Question[edit]

Might I ask, would you eventually like to be an admin someday? RkMnQ (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a hypothetical question, my friend. RkMnQ (talk) 21:16, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to archive your page as well; it's getting fairly big. RkMnQ (talk) 21:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh (lol; well sort of...) :P. RkMnQ (talk) 22:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

National Shrine of St. Elizabeth Ann Seton[edit]

Thanks for the smile. You did a great job adding the page. It was the least I could do to add the info box. Now all we need is a copyright free picture of the Shrine and it will be perfect.Marauder40 (talk) 13:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Shrine is about an 1 1/2 hour drive from me, I don't get out there that often. I go to the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception at least once a month, but I don't make it to Emmitsburg as often as I would like. Marauder40 (talk) 13:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I wanted to thanks you for supporting my page that I want published (eliteanswers.com). I have made some changes based on the discussion the editors are having, and I was hoping you could tell me where I am going wrong. The changes to the site or on my user page. I removed the press releases, although I was told they are legitimate. I left one as a refernce but if I need to remove it also I will.

Thanks again for taking the time. I appreciate that you actually did a google search and saw that the company is legitimate also. Another editor said he did one and nothing came up which I found rather odd. Yitzhaac Pesach (talk) 13:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I am gonna try to create as many articles on notable subjects as possible, with as much info as possible, although sometimes info can hard to find. After I finish early TV, I'm gonna do more articles on albums by 70's pop groups. Thanks for the encouragement! Retro Agnostic (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: AfD[edit]

Everyone has the right to question the arguments of others. After all, the whole AfD process is based on people grilling me on my opinion that the article should be deleted, isn't it? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 23:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See, that's the thing; people shouldn't be voting on who's saying what. They should be voting on whether the article should stay or not. Its counter-productive if somebody feels that an article should stay because someone else thinks it shouldn't.
Also, the problem is that many people are making invalid points, and I'm afraid that the closing admin will just skim over the votes and do a tally instead of actually read what's being said. So far, I think it'll be a delete result if everything is read. That's not the purpose, of course; I'd like to help people learn about article standards at the same time. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 23:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll check out the sock case. As for the debate, I do respect all opinions present; however, I choose to question them. I guess I feel that is more productive. I don't worry about my "cause" because I don't really have one. Oh, and thanks for speaking your mind about this by the way! :) Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 04:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not trying to sway the closing admin's opinion, but rather flesh out a debate. Policy shouldn't be the final deciding factor in every matter of conflict on Wikipedia, because you can't blanket 2.5 million articles with only a handful of policies. Rather, the editors should call the shots, with policy only being a guideline. That's why I'm questioning some keep votes (and delete votes too, mind you); to encourage some discussion. I realise some people may find it intrusive. Whatever it is, I do respect their opinions, and 99% of the time we end up having some great insights given.
Also, good call explaining our ability to discuss our opinions! :) Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 16:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I often comment on votes, even if they're going my way, if they're incorrectly explained. And yeah, I've written a few articles, though only one whole one. I usually do stub and citing work. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 00:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for Youssa[edit]

I hope I'm not pestering you...

The Original Barnstar
I am proud to present this barnstar to Ecoleetage, for his work at AfD, and for making this place quite humorous. Keep up the good work. RockManQ (talk) 01:35, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One of the advantages of not having many supporters at your RFA is that there are fewer people to thank at the end. Thanks for your support and your willingness to look at my complete record. I'm going to try to interpret this resounding defeat as a statement that I should choose my words more carefully in the future, and remember that every statement I make gets recorded forever, just waiting to get carefully transcribed onto my next RFA. I would go insane if I believed that it was repudiation of what I truly meant: that no editor should consciously and willfully ignore guidelines and policies, and editors that repeatedly do so should not be rewarded for or supported in doing so.

I'm sure I'll get back to full speed editing soon, because, after all, , every day, and in every way, I am getting better and better.—Kww(talk) 05:37, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cookie[edit]

Hey, I thought you deseved this for your niceness ( i couldn't think of any other way to put it!). I wish every user was like you. Anyway, hope this cookie brightens up your day and good luck on Wikipedia! AtheWeatherman (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My wiki way of saying Thanks[edit]

Your smile made me smile and to show my appreciation for you and what you do I award you this Barnstar.

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Your smile made me smile and to show my appreciation for you and what you do I award you this Barnstar.AtheWeatherman (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome[edit]

You deserved it by the way, not all would of smiled at me. Anyway I had to give it to you, you are so humerous, I would of given that barnstar too because the comments made me laugh and smile. Lol!

You made my day[edit]

I told you were nice, and you made my day just perfect too, but who in their right mind would clobber you? AtheWeatherman (talk) 17:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's clobbering time![edit]

Alphabetticaly please. Na, just joking. How do you know their heights? ha ha!

Thank you note[edit]

Thank you for your kind words. You are such a gentleman. --Poeticbent talk 18:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(You wrote)
Congratulations on adding Franciszek and Magdalena Banasiewicz to Wikipedia. Your work is peerless. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:32, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEB[edit]

Saw your note to Fish and karate about the Universal Edit Button. If you're interested, I created a userbox about it... Cheers, Steven Walling (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the smile (and sorry for taking so long to say thank you!) :D fish&karate 12:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

you said to contact you for help, is this the way to contact you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amer Rabayah (talkcontribs) 14:02, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWB-Palestine[edit]

i think i start understand,

i get these messeges when i post the information about EWB-Palestine, and i need to finilize its apperance to be good

i hope it is easy, i don't know also how to signis it like this Amer Rabayah (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWB-Palestine[edit]

So i have to add this to my editing of EWB-Palestine

Amer Rabayah (2007-10-10). "EWB-International". Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2007-10-10.

Amer Rabayah (talk) 14:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWB-Palestine[edit]

You are great, thanks a lotAmer Rabayah (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWB-Palestine[edit]

Ok, i only try to do as i can, to make it easier for you

i will leave it now, but i think i get something

thanks Amer Rabayah (talk) 15:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EWB-Palestine[edit]

thanks, i will contact you for more information, where are you from?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amer Rabayah (talkcontribs) 16:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guideline to film articles[edit]

Hi I noticed that you don't add cast/character sections in film articles and also I;ve seen you remove original film posters in favour of recent DVD covers. Please follow the guidelines to film to improve your articles. Cheers and keep up the good work! The Bald One White cat 16:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you thought it necessary to remove my good faith message as if I was attacking you. I agree about duplicating information. I think it would be best to have a proper cast section which includes cast and characters rather than the list in the infobox but I guess that is the custom. The reaosn why I said about it as there is actually a WP:Films template "Films needing cast section" in the way there is maintenence project tags for articles that need images or plot sections which means editors are working through them to add them. I believe you have a strong point, which could be addressed to the project of the need, or rather lack of a need for double cast listings.

There is also much to be said about the double imdb link which was recently addressed at WP:Film. In the same way we should drop one or the other I think. Take care The Bald One White cat 17:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I obvious misinterpreted the original message -- my error, and I am sorry for that. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well the most important thing is the actual content of articles, and might I say your starter film articles are actually a lot better than most of the film stubs started on here. Keep up the good work. The Bald One White cat 17:47, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eco --I noticed you nominated this article for deletion, I just want to tell you there is a discussion on roughly the same thing at Talk:List of French supercentenarians. Cheers ~one of many editorofthewikis (talk/contribs/editor review)~ 19:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Trial (1962 film)[edit]

Updated DYK query On 11 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Trial (1962 film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

RyanCross (talk) 01:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD=[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage, I have responded to you here.--Theoneintraining (talk) 02:08, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taxoboxes?[edit]

Doug, I never heard back from you regarding the taxoboxes for the Ag WikiProject. What exactly do you need done? Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 22:04, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eco, sorry to not get back to you sooner, I was finishing up an Army class and now I'm back home but shortly off again. Basically, there are no taxoboxes for domestic animals other than dogs, cats, and horses. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture/Archive 1#Domestic/Cultivated vs Wild Issues and Wikipedia:Taxobox#Taxoboxes in particular, as well as the reference to breed boxes on Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture under "Guidelines" and under "Infoboxes" which is a subheading of "Templates". We were discussing a plan at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture/Infobox nearly a year ago but it fizzled. The basic problem is that Cow should have a real Tree of Life style taxobox showing it as domesticated, but Galloway cattle should have a breed box whith emphasis on different issues altogether. I'll be glad to discuss it with you and work on it. But I don't have time right now to take the lead as I'm getting ready for an extended trip abroad. Together with this I'd like to see us implement the change discussed at one point on the MOS as well as the AG project regarding changing breed list names to get rid of the word "lists", but I'll explain that later.--Doug.(talk contribs) 02:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you, too, Eco[edit]

Barnstar much appreciated. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 03:16, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Hey, Eco. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg 23:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Belated election congrats![edit]

It is a great pleasure to see you elected as a coordinator, and I look forward to working with you! I've presented an opening slate of items, and your comments are requested. (Additionally, if you haven't already, you must add the coordinator talk page to your watchlist.) Congrats and speak soon, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back[edit]

Well my friend, I'm back from the cruise. The ship stopped in Catalina Island and in Ensenada Mexico. The last time I was in Mexico was in 1969, when I was sent to Camp Pendelton and I visited Tijuana. The thing about Ensenada that I had to see was La Bufadora and the Convention center which once was a casino owned by Al Capone. Tony the Marine (talk) 06:22, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Hi, I'd like two tickets for the matinée performance of "From the New World", please....oh wait...wrong line. While here, I'd like to thank Ecoleetage for his generous support (btw: in general, I love your work thus far on the encyclopedia. I've disagreed with you on AfDs...but I still can't help laughing). Kindest, Lazulilasher (talk) 23:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You were wrong? (or not)[edit]

As you have not responded to me here, Do I take it as your accusations were wrong towards me on the La Cala Resort AfD page?.--intraining Jack In 04:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never accused you of anything. My focus is on content, not contributors. As for the AfD, it has closed and I see no value in revisiting it. Thank you and be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Thanks :). The post-mortem for the experiment can be found here, and as a contributor to the RfA you're welcome to comment, although I don't know if you hang around RfA much. Ironholds (talk) 12:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Thanks for you help:)

The company is apparently registerd under Elite Web Inc., but its online business name, an umbrella for its products, EliteAnswers.com. I would say that this is the "Public name", if that makes any sense.

I really appreactiate you taking the time for this, thanks again. Yitzhaac Pesach (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to draw your attention to this AfD discussion I have just started. I am leaving this message here as you were involved in the previous discussion about this page which ended just over a week ago. I realise that this renomination is not within the normal acceptable time frame and I have outlined my reasoning for the exception on the discussion page. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I hope you had a fab, vacation even if it was just a mini one...where did you go? Thanks again for alll of your help.Yitzhaac Pesach (talk) 13:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA[edit]

Hey there! Thanks for voting in my RFA. I'm happy to say that it successfully passed with 60 supports, 0 opposes and 2 neutrals – of which, one of them was you. If you have any comments, questions, criticisms or advice for me that can help me improve in or for the future, please feel free to let me know. I hope I'll be able to live up to everyone's expectations! All the best, Ale_Jrbtalk 20:46, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My input[edit]

Thanks for your message, it brightened up my day in a way that AFD never does. Very nice to see another editor who doesn't yell at "the other side". Maybe the "Surely..." sentence was subconscious, who knows? Pagrashtak 21:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xymmax RfA[edit]

I'd like to take a minute to let you know that I appreciate your support in my recently-closed RfA, which passed with a count of 56 in support, 7 in opposition, and 2 neutrals. I'll certainly try to justify your faith by using the tools wisely. Happy editing, and thanks again! Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 21:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Too Much Johnson[edit]

Updated DYK query On 15 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Too Much Johnson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 03:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey bud. Could you see about expanding some of the films by Eric Rohmer, they are amongst the worst sets of articles I;ve seen on films, especially as it is by an acclaimed director. Could you look into it? Best Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 12:40, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I'm in the middle of stub sorting the French films by decade. So many... Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yum Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That award...[edit]

User:ArcheopteryxUser talk:Archeopteryx.

In fact, you presented it to a seventh grader!--Archeopteryx (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Water Fuel Museum[edit]

Hi, you recently !voted to keep the article Water Fuel Museum in an Afd. I'm working on cleaning up the article and dealing with unsourced content, and was hoping that you could drop by and provide some input. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the exhibits; one of the reasons I asked was because I did not want to get into an edit war about them. I personally agree that this would best be served as a stub, but what really needs to happen first of all is that some kind of consensus needs to be reached on the talk page, so I don't really have a timeline yet. What can't be allowed is for the page to turn into some kind of advertisement for water fuel, which is, to put it mildly, very dubious science.
One other note--the page's creator is Kywfm--which looks like an acronym for Kentucky Water Fuel Museum, especially since page creation is his only contribution. It appears that one of the big editors on the page is very devoted to his POV about the subject matter. So, I think that stubbification is almost certainly the best route, due to the COI here, and to prevent the page from being overrun by POV. TallNapoleon (talk) 18:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Don Quixote (unfinished film)[edit]

Updated DYK query On 16 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Don Quixote (unfinished film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:23, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look at my document, and advise?[edit]

Could you look at THIS and advise if I am preparing it correctly, as I have never done such before. Thank you. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Inre THIS, you are no doubt correct... which is why I am seeking sage advice. Something is more than fishy that the article started out as sourced and notable and passed an AfD and then was reduced to a few badly sourced non-notable bits of trivia and then was sent back to AfD without any regard for it having been deconstructed first.... and then smacked by a user account that never existed before that day. As you have ideas suggestions how I may point out the flaws in the AfD, please let me know. Thanks Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Editing that article myself is exactly what I have striven NOT to do. I feel the nom is taking advantage of that. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My First Article ![edit]

Yay, my first article :D I think it's ok, but do you think you could look over it? RockManQ (talk) 02:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep it's always great to learn new stuff. Thanks, RockManQ (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

heh[edit]

lol. and I was expecting the message to be someone complaining about me deleting their article.... Small worldwiki after all huh? ;) Thingg 15:45, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks![edit]

hey! thanks for your nice message, i appreciate it. i'd give you a picture too (or a sticker, like when my kid goes potty by herself) if i knew how to do that. we're probably not going to go agree on the afd that we're involved in right now, but that's ok. take care!

oh, i just thought of this: i don't know how to paste stickers and pictures, but i can draw you a heartfelt straight line, like this: ----------------------- Drmies (talk) 01:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • ha, check it out:
Cookies!
{{{1}}}
  • sorry, i'm out of milk, need to go shopping. thanks for the advice! Drmies (talk) 01:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Part II[edit]

Thank you for the kind words. We're living in the golden age of Wikipedia, and it's mostly a lot of fun. Mandsford (talk) 23:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

The Working Man's Barnstar
Thanks for your work on defending the Saw article in the AFD. I appreciate it.CyberGhostface (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you very much for your offer. I'll let him know. Best wishes, DurovaCharge! 22:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear lord, how many do you have now?! 60?!?! Happy Editing, RockManQ (talk) 02:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Surreal Barnstar
For giving a great debate in AfDs. Undead Warrior (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just letting you know that it is now in my userspace should you wish to help continue improving it. Regards, --A Nobody 17:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having a credit rating ≠ being notable[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage

Happy to let the merits of the Al-Mawarid Bank S.A.L.‎ article be judged by consensus. However, I thought you might care to know a little more about the credit rating process. Credit ratings agencies review the creditworthiness of legal entities and specific securities whose creditworthiness they believe their subscribers will care about, or that they are paid to rate. There is nothing particularly notable about having a credit rating. Fitch, according to this brochure, rates:

  • 3,500 financial institutions and their securities,
  • 2,400 insurance companies
  • 2,000 corporate entities
  • an undisclosed number of structured finance vehicles

The belief that all of these entities are automatically notable because of their rating does not seem supportable to me. Do you think it is?

Rgds Bongomatic (talk) 05:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, it works for me! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks …[edit]

… for my very first barnstar. Deor (talk) 18:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Digitally Imported AfD undo[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage! I requested a copy of the Digitally Imported article which was deleted twice via AfD, second time nominated by you on grounds of not establishing notability (which I agree with at the state the article was in at the time). I've worked on the article and removed all the advertising, as well as adding third-party sources to establish notability. If at all possible, I would very much appreciate it if you could give the article a once-over and see if you find it a suitable article. It's currently located here: User:Twinzor/Sandbox/Digitally Imported. My intention is not to canvass, but to just see if other editor's think the page is good enough to be moved to mainspace. If, however, you don't have the time or interest to review the article, I completely understand that. And of course, if you think the article still has issues, pointing those out would be very helpfull! Thanks, and happy editing! — Twinzor Say hi! - Do I suck or rock? 12:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Man's Fate[edit]

Were we to create independent articles for every film which was cancelled in pre-production, we'd probably have nearly as many articles to add as we currently have! It's a very common industry occurrence, and per our standard notability rules, we generally keep information on unproduced films in a subsection of the source material's article. I'd recommend discussing this with Erik and Steve, though, since they are more active in this part of the guidelines, and I'd certainly be curious to hear their thoughts on the matter. Would that be fair? Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 12:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're confusing two identical but different terms. "A production" is a common term in the industry synonymous with a film being production, while "the production stage" is a term used to denote principal photography. By definition, pre-production lasts from when financing is secured until when the filming begins, and therefore, this film died in pre-production. Again, I would encourage you to seek out Erik and Steve and see if they have different opinions on this, since they often are involved in these questions regarding merging. Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Ecoleetage. You have new messages at JamieS93's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The article's a mess and reads like a fansite but claims that she's an "American Idol" contestant. This is an assertion of notability. I would recommend removing the A7 and sending it to AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the tag to G3 and cited the hoax in the subject line. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arrica Rose[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage. I declined the speedy, because the CSD A7 criteria do not actually require a subject to be notable, they just say that "to avoid speedy deletion an article does not have to prove that its subject is notable, just give a reasonable indication of why it might be notable." In my opinion, the various claims that the article made were sufficient to indicate why she might be notable.

That said, I agree that the actual notability of her is questionable, so I reckon that AfD was the right call to make. Best wishes, Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The Trial (1962 film) and Too Much Johnson[edit]

Dear Ecoleetage, thanks for developing The Trial (1962 film) and Too Much Johnson. I enjoyed reading them. Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 07:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your amazing reply. Your reply has certainly made my day better. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 14:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting my RfA[edit]

Thanks for the support with your great comment in my RfA :) I am looking forward for a new studio album of yours, Diana. -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

North Korean films[edit]

Cheers! It's just a pity that information is so scant for these films; in fact, I think I've just doubled our coverage of North Korean films! PC78 (talk) 00:07, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fear and Desire[edit]

Hello, Ecoleetage. You have new messages at Fuhghettaboutit's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Article[edit]

Not sure yet; going to wait a bit before I do anything so that the story unfolds. Thanks though. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:05, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

True, sad but true. I'll give it a day though. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 06:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Topic workshop[edit]

See this discussion concerning moving my topic workshop draft into the project. Feel free to propose any potential topics you have in mind. — sephiroth bcr (converse) 07:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Washburn Elementary School[edit]

Hello my friend, it is always great to hear from you. I find the Washburn Elementary School stub interesting. When the United States invaded Puerto Rico one of the first things that the new government attempted in its process of Americanization of the island was to eliminate "Spanish", they went as far as to changing the islands name to "Porto Rico". The process did not work and "Spanish" was reinstated as the peoples language. I find it interesting that there are still private institutions with the same agenda in mind.

It would be great if the history of the institution were included in the stub, thereby making it a little more difficult for the deletionists in our project to nominate it for deletion. Tony the Marine (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fear and Desire[edit]

Updated DYK query On 28 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fear and Desire, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 20:58, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help![edit]

This article might need clean-up. Oh yeah, this article might need (more) improvement! The latter looks like a stub, the former needs corrections! HELP! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Man's Fate (unfinished film)[edit]

Updated DYK query On 29 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Man's Fate (unfinished film), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Mawarid Bank S.A.L.[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage

I see that you have recreated the above-captioned article. Are there any new claims to notability that should be considered?

Rgds, Bongomatic (talk) 16:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Ecoleetage. You have new messages at Narutolovehinata5's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BTW, you have lots of DYKs! You have a bright future ahead of you! :) Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, the future's not what it used to be. :) Ecoleetage (talk) 03:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macbeth (1948 film)[edit]

Dear Ecoleetage, this edit is a gem. You changed everthing with that one edit! Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 13:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 14:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for the barnstar! You do a fine job yourself, especially with your reports at UAA. Cheers! TNX-Man 17:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a Google News archive search and found some references for ACE Canada. I gave a link for the search at the AfD but I didn't add them to the article yet. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ACE Canada. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macbeth[edit]

Thanks for your kind note. I sorta held my breath while deciding to wordsmith it a little, because you had done such a fine start; I hoped you wouldn't be offended if I corrected a typo or two – and I got carried away and changed a few words. Thanks again.Raymondwinn (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween![edit]

File:Halloween Hush Puppies.jpg
Photograph of my Halloween-themed Hush Puppies plush basset hounds in my bedroom.

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 14:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Thank you. Not at all necessary. Toddst1 (talk) 20:57, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Random Irrelevance[edit]

For whatever it's worth, before the brouhaha I meant to compliment your choice of name, if as I suspect it's a play on "decolletage" and other words. I'm still a relative noob with respect to links, so I'll have to skip the formal barnstar – but I still wish to award you the unofficial text Barnstar of Tenacity, Camaraderie, and Passion. Neutrality is Wiki's cornerstone, but it would have never survived if editors didn't have those three traits in abundance. arimareiji (talk) 21:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the story was even more random than I thought... random is good. ^_^ "dark Arima" was a nickname I picked up in the anime con circuit, from Arima Soichiro's apparent alter ego in Kare Kano. When later in the story the alter ego was revealed to be his father Arima Reiji, I changed over. arimareiji (talk) 00:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can't say I've seen that one... I mostly tend to watch shoujo anime like Kare Kano, though I've seen my share of action/adventure as well. But if I ever start making/fixing articles for all the anime I watch, I don't think I'll have time to eat or sleep or work anymore. So for the most part I try to stay away from the temptation. ;-) arimareiji (talk) 01:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween![edit]

I believe Halloween is celebrated in Portugal, although I'm not quite sure it's similar to what we do in the United States. However, I wish you well. Happy Halloween, RockManQ (talk) 23:16, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Halloween!

Your new article[edit]

(You wrote)
Hello, my friend. I wanted to alert you that I removed a Speedy Delete tag that was placed on your new article Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust. You may want to be aware that an effort may be made to remove the article from this site. I hope you are doing well -- and thank you for bringing important articles to Wikipedia. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

Hi Ecoleetage, and thanks for supporting my successful request for adminship. It was nice to see all the kind comments I got from my supporters and I hope that I will be more useful to the community now that I have the tools again.--Berig (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles started and developed by you[edit]

Dear Ecoleetage, I found that you've started and developed many articles. You work is impressive, so I've someting for you.

The Special Barnstar
For starting and developing many articles, and to let you know that your hard work is seen and appreciated. AdjustShift (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :-) AdjustShift (talk) 08:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dirty Gertie from Harlem U.S.A.[edit]

Updated DYK query On 1 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dirty Gertie from Harlem U.S.A., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers! Royalbroil 20:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replies[edit]

Thanks for your message on my talk page, Ecoleetage. Sorry that I can't be of help w/ that article: not one I'm really interested in working on and have no time to do so right now anyway. Hope you are well too. --NYScholar (talk) 03:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks too for your second message on my talk page. I will be traveling elsewhere on the 16th, but thanks for mentioning it. I would certainly have enjoyed meeting you too! If you do go, have fun!! (Re: article subject of 1st subject: I'm more into eating cookies than writing about them!!! :-) --NYScholar (talk) 23:36, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Francine Everett[edit]

Updated DYK query On 3 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Francine Everett, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Course of action?[edit]

The amount of IDONTLIKE it there is getting ridiculous. If you can, please restore it, there is still no proof of plagiarism or copyvio, just some spurious accusations.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of the outcome of your RfA, I hope your next one will do better. I will rewrite the article somewhat and repost it on the talk page soon, this is ridiculous.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films October 2008 Newsletter[edit]

The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:59, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ecoleetage. You have new messages at WikiDan61's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RfA thanks[edit]

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy
·Add§hore· Talk/Cont 19:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the laugh[edit]

with this !vote. :) StarM 02:32, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Eco, nice to see you again. Well anyways, I'm about to go for my first GAN over Tabun (nerve agent). I've being doing some hard work on it, and I'm going to try and get it a GA. I was wondering if you could give it a look through (or possibly review it), and see what you think. Anything would be appreciated. Your friend, The Q Man 03:08, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input, I'll get to at as soon as I can. BTW, I asked you because of your experience in DYK. Cheers, RockManQ (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I guess I see you somewhat as a mentor. Cheers, RockManQ (talk) 03:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Greatest Story Ever Told[edit]

Updated DYK query On 6 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Greatest Story Ever Told, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions. – RyanCross (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Massaro House[edit]

Updated DYK query On 6 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Massaro House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 11:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for signing my guestbook! :D - Jameson L. Tai talkguestbookcontribs 15:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vienna Fingers[edit]

Updated DYK query On 6 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vienna Fingers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

You're making me hungry! Royalbroil 16:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Raquel Tejada[edit]

I just found this on Master of Puppets' talk page. I'm not so old I can't still appreciate her. ;D Thanx. Did you know she never had a successful film? (Did you care? =]) TREKphiler hit me ♠ 16:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your article rewrite[edit]

Was wondering which editor it was submitted to? Thanks. Boodlesthecat Meow? 17:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind I found it.:)

Question: Your version states "It has been determined there were cases where entire communities worked together in the rescue of Jews, despite knowledge by the community members of the danger to their own lives (pictured) [1] This claim is sourced to a Paulsson article.

  • What statement in the Paullson article supports that claim? Boodlesthecat Meow? 18:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The sentence refers to a picture of Polish farmers who had been executed by the Einsatzgruppen. What source do you have that indicates these executions were related to rescue of Jews?
  • Also, what is the source for the statement "working independently of each other and without directions from the London-based Polish government-in-exile"?

There are other issues further on, but let's start with the lead. Boodlesthecat Meow? 18:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, Boodlesthecat (can I call you Boodles, or Boo, or Mr. Cat?) -- I have to go lay wires for a couple of hours and I won't be online. If you want to work with me in fixing that thorny article, here's what I will ask: Go through the draft of the article (and, yes, it is a draft) and point out every problem you find. I will then take your list, return to the draft, and correct every error that is cited. How does that sound? Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The issues with the lead are not necessarily "errors", as I said, they are questions (and by raising them, I am working "with" you.) If you can cite where in the source you used the above claims are supported, then there is no error. getting the lead down correctly impacts the whole article, so there is no point in going through the whole article until a supported thesis can be nailed down. If the claim "entire communities worked together in the rescue of Jews" is not supported, that is going to strongly impact the tenor of the rest of the article. Boodlesthecat Meow? 18:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I re-edited the lead and removed the photo -- your points were well taken. Let me know where to proceed. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where in the Paulsson article that is used as a ref is the statement "a number of Polish villages and communities worked together in the rescue of Polish Jews from the Nazi occupation" supported? Boodlesthecat Meow? 21:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will go back to the Paulsson text to reconfirm this is correct when I am able to devote proper time to researching the subject (I am just taking a break at the moment from a construction project). Please continue with your editorial suggestions. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have the Paulsson article? Boodlesthecat Meow? 21:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is difficult to find; instead I recommend a much easier and better work – his newer book, published by Yale, that covers the topics of the article: "Secret City: The Hidden Jews of Warsaw, 1940–1945 " [1]. There are many sources to support a general claim (about Polish communities saving Jews): Paulsson book; another book by Nechama Tec ([2]), Piotrowski ([3]), Pawlikowski ([4]) – this one mentions plural convents, btw... once the article is restored it will be easier to verify/expand such claims. PS. I can't find proof that the first two images used in the article were related to punishment for sheltering Jews; the third one is (and I think it will be possible to find others).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 22:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the sentence in question is "a number of Polish villages and communities worked together in the rescue of Polish Jews from the Nazi occupation." Paulsson discusses instances where individuals and some organizations worked together with Jews, it's not a source for "a number of Polish villages and communities worked together in the rescue of Polish Jews from the Nazi occupation"; Tec discusses instances of support for Jews in the face of hostility from Polish communities,and she asks at one point "What prompted these people to risk their lives in an undertaking that showed little promise of community support?"; Piotrowskilikewise does not supprt the claim "a number of Polish villages and communities worked together in the rescue of Polish Jews from the Nazi occupation," and the cases of the convents are examples of just that, rather than support for the general claim. Boodlesthecat Meow? 00:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Communities only in rare instances worked with other communities. The point is not that they often collaborated with each other – which is not the case – but that they were many. I'd suggest repharsing the sentence to avoid this confusion: "a number of Polish communities (villages and others) attempted to rescue Polish Jews during the Nazi occupation".--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And where are the sources indicating "a number of Polish communities (villages and others) attempted to rescue Polish Jews during the Nazi occupation"? As opposed to individuals or groups within them? Boodlesthecat Meow? 03:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I will fix the citation as time allows, either later today or over the weekend. Again, let's please move on to the remainder of the article. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

The first time I think anyone has simply written with encouragement. Cheers. Orthorhombic (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

I have reviewed the pdf closely with your new version. I made a few smaller changes directly. It looks well revised. There are only a few passages which I think may present a lingering concern for copyright. There are a few things I've suggested to bring the material in line with sources. The whole of it is over here. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Rescue of Jews by Non-Jews in Nazi-Occupied Poland[edit]

I've requested a hardcopy, seems that the thing is not easily find online, even with the resources of my rather big university. Found abstract here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
For your assistance in rescuing Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust from deletion, I award you the The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
this WikiAward was given to Ecoleetage by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk on 15:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you note[edit]

Dear Eco Lee Tage and Dear Piotrus,

I'd like to commend you both on your exemplary work at bringing the article Rescue of Jews by Polish communities during the Holocaust back to its proper place in main-space. I would also like to thank those who took their time to deal with its challenges in a positive, community building manner.

Please be aware that the painting of the Polish nation black is a popular past-time among many a Holocaust ideologues and so the groundbreaking effort of trying to present the full picture here in Wikipedia can be heartrending. I will not dignify with links those writers who claim that there was only a handful of rescuers in all of WWII Poland, but I do have them on my hard-drive to confirm my words. I’m sure there are also those who make a good living as educators by purporting such claims.

In contrast, the editorial effort of Wikipedians like yourself originates from a genuine thirst for knowledge, and it is also free of charge. It is however, not free from morally and psychologically damaging clashes with Wikipedians hidden behind monikers and pushing old stereotypes. That’s why I chose to distance myself from political spin off developing in talk, because for me it was the article that mattered: a collection of facts readily available, presented against the barrage of loaded messages regurgitated online by ignorant bigots. I'm not interested in killing time by bickering with phantoms anyway.

I’m very busy in real life right now, and will remain so for the next week. However, I intent to go back to this article and improve on it further time permitting. For now, please accept my sincere thanks for all you’ve done. --Poeticbent talk 19:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cc.: User:Piotrus

NYC Meetup: You are invited![edit]

New York City Meetup


Next: Sunday November 16th, Columbia University area
Last: 6/01/2008
This box: view  talk  edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wisdoms RFA[edit]

"he's done 2,500 flawless CSD tags ". Please re-read my nomination. I expresly did not say anything like that. I respect your input, but please don't mis-represent my words. Pedro :  Chat  22:22, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Pedro :  Chat  22:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA. Sorry if I instigated a slight bit of drama by questioning your oppose. You, of course, have the right to oppose the candidate. I let my "vehement" support get in the way here, totally my mistake. I really shouldn't have done it; doing so only hurts Wisdom's chance. Again, sorry. Cheers, RockManQ (talk) 23:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

On this article, Acetylcholinesterase, an editor has put in a link (in the actual article) to another Wiki. I was generally under the impression that that is a no-no. However, since I'm not 100% sure I wanted to ask before I removed it or something. Cheers, RockManQ (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks. Cheers, RockManQ (talk) 23:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]