User talk:Don't Talk With Me

[Note from Jimbo: this user was previously blocked under account User:Brexx for sockpuppeting, copyright violations, and so on but he's promised to behave, so let's give him a chance! Very short leash though.]--Jimbo Wales (talk) 08:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Don't Talk With Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To be able to edit the ip address 68.62.240.86 needs to be unblocked, i ask for the ip address to be unblocked Per Jimbo's request

Accept reason:

I've changed the IP so that the block will not block registered users. You should be able to edit with this account now. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request of the ip of the university i attend, Full Sail University[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Don't Talk With Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The ip address 68.62.240.86 is the ip i use at home. The ip 66.192.104.13 is the ip of the university i attend, Full Sail University. I spend alot of time in the university, so i edit while i'm there, therefore this ip needs to be unblocked as well, per Jimbo's request.

Decline reason:

Given that you're on a "Very short leash", I'm not going to unblock a shared IP address which was presumably blocked for a good reason. Let's see how you go just editing from home. Nick-D (talk) 05:23, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On further investigation, I see that that shared IP address is blocked mainly because you were using it to create sock puppet accounts before you were unblocked. I think that this block can remain in place until you earn the trust of the community. Ask again in a couple of months. Nick-D (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-blocked[edit]

Given what Kww says here, it turns out there was no factual basis for the second-chance ban lifting that was offered to you by Jimbo Wales. You have evidently not learned to understand what the problems with your previous editing were, and thus your second chance is evidently not based on a genuine, realistic plan to edit differently in the future. Also, your edit on Kww's page [1] shows an alarming lack of social competence in addition to the lack of academic competence. If you previously called for Kww to be killed, as he says (and I have no reason to doubt the veracity of what he's saying), then you can't simply go to his page now and tell him "anyway, you want to be friends and help each other or not?" One of the obvious preconditions that should have been required of you before any unban could even be considered, according to basic human decency, would have been a genuine, public apology to Kww and others you have harmed in the past. The fact that this was apparently not done only goes to show that the unban offer was given without due fact-checking and without due consultation with the community; it was therefore never valid in the first place. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]