User talk:Dineshkannambadi/Archive8
Greek Play[edit]
Surely,I had that link few months back.I will give it to you.But this whole wikipidia and its rules look bit awkard to me where members ask proof and clarification from us when we are no Linguist or a Indologist to argue about.
I need some time to understand this whole procedure.And I will surely put that Link in Talk page. Nrupatunga 03:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
You have mail[edit]
email --Mattisse 12:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Intercaste marriage[edit]
Previously I removed more statements about inter caste marriage -- not that it clarified the situation (in my mind). Do you want me to restore the two paras that mention it to their previous state? Might help you choose what to do about it. --Mattisse 14:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- O.K. --Mattisse 14:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Court - under Language[edit]
When you say "court" what do you mean? I just realised that I was assuming the court of a judicial or administrative system, but you are referring to the royal court? --Mattisse 18:08, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I still don't know what you mean. Is the royal court and the administrative system one and the same? --Mattisse 18:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Would you mind if I took a look at that and see if I can't make it clearer? Maybe just sticking "royal" in would help. As I recall, in the other articles there were various layers of royal and local/regional administrations in a hierarchy with independent outcropping here and there. Not so in this case? --Mattisse 18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is the sentence that bothers me and I would like to remove it: "The courts of peninsular India (outside of Tamilakam) reflected the interface between the increasingly assertive local language of Kannada and the expanding Sanskritic culture." The reason I don't like it is because it is vague. In my mind the specific examples are better. But the specific examples do not help explain "increaslingly assertive". How is a language "assertive"? --Mattisse 18:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- But in the English language it sounds strange. Is a truck "assertive" because its driver is? Maybe I am wrong here. Would you mind if I ask Tony1? He's the FA expert on this sort of thing. --Mattisse 18:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- This is the sentence that bothers me and I would like to remove it: "The courts of peninsular India (outside of Tamilakam) reflected the interface between the increasingly assertive local language of Kannada and the expanding Sanskritic culture." The reason I don't like it is because it is vague. In my mind the specific examples are better. But the specific examples do not help explain "increaslingly assertive". How is a language "assertive"? --Mattisse 18:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
- Would you mind if I took a look at that and see if I can't make it clearer? Maybe just sticking "royal" in would help. As I recall, in the other articles there were various layers of royal and local/regional administrations in a hierarchy with independent outcropping here and there. Not so in this case? --Mattisse 18:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Just chop #142, move up #144[edit]
What does that mean? I do not see line numbers on my computer. Is there a way of seeing them that I don't know about? The reason I care is because I care about good writing. --Mattisse 19:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
email[edit]
You have mail. I will use your solution if I can make it work. I would like to remove that sentence though. --Mattisse 19:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Status[edit]
Looks like you did a lot of chop on Society and Economy. It looks good. What is your evaluation? --Mattisse 22:29, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Taxes[edit]
You have a line about taxes in the Administration section. Should it be there when there is so much about taxes under Economy? --Mattisse 23:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Footnote for moved sentence?[edit]
I moved this sentence: "The Rashtrakuta government levied a shipping tax of one golden Gadyana on all foreign vessels embarking to any other ports and a fee of one silver Ctharna on vessels travelling locally." I moved it to the section on maritime trade and ports. It was in a general tax section that had a general footnote at the end of several sentences. Should the footnote be copied to the moved sentence also? --Mattisse 00:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I already did it - look at it & change if you want[edit]
I was surprised you were so laid back about it. Glad to see your OC kicking back in. It's the more normal you. --Mattisse 00:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
I think it looks good.[edit]
If you have to cut down on history, maybe those lists at the end when the empire is fragmenting could be generalised without mentioning every single one -- or is that necessary for some reason? --Mattisse 00:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
You have mail too![edit]
--Mattisse 01:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- More mail. --Mattisse 01:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Plus I reworded para 1 of Language[edit]
Better take a look. --Mattisse 01:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
You have mail[edit]
I am sorry. I will not change my mind. --Mattisse 06:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Greek drama charition Link[edit]
J.R.A.S. ,1904,p.399 Dr.hultzsch
Will Try to give you more Links on this.
Nrupatunga 09:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
mail[edit]
You have mail! --Mattisse 17:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
cite 142 link[edit]
goes to "not found" --Mattisse 17:55, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
O.K.[edit]
I took a guess because it wasn't clear so make it the way it should be. I sent you email about a few other changes I made. Sorry! --Mattisse 00:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
mail[edit]
--Mattisse 20:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Want me to try? --Mattisse 20:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)