User talk:Deviloper

April 2010[edit]

In a recent edit, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bakhytbek Baiseitov[edit]

Hello Deviloper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bakhytbek Baiseitov for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Mikhail Lomtadze[edit]

Hello, Deviloper,

Thanks for creating Mikhail Lomtadze! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for your new article on Mikhail Lomtadze, but is should be cleaned up to match Wikipedia's formatting guidelines. Use the links in the notices at the top of the page for pointers.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:"People's Gratitude" medal (Kazakhstan)[edit]

Hello, Deviloper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:"People's Gratitude" medal (Kazakhstan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vyacheslav Kim[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vyacheslav Kim, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have moved your article to Draft:Vyacheslav Kim, where you can work on improving it and submit for review. Deb (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, dear MrsSnoozyTurtle,Deb. Thank you so much for sending the article Draft:Vyacheslav Kim to drafts, I will promote its content according to your and Wikipedia’s recommendations. Ending the edition, it will be sent for your observation Deviloper (talk) 07:50, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In future, please use Wikipedia:Articles for creation when you want to make a new article. Deb (talk) 10:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:"People's Gratitude" medal (Kazakhstan)[edit]

Hello, Deviloper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, ""People's Gratitude" medal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mikhail Lomtadze[edit]

Hello, Deviloper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mikhail Lomtadze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikhail Lomtadze[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mikhail Lomtadze, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JBchrch talk 19:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this article back to draftspace. It is still clearly not ready for mainspace. You can continue to work on it at Draft:Mikhail Lomtadze. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mikheil Lomtadze for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikheil Lomtadze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikheil Lomtadze until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 01:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Hello Deviloper. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Mikheil Lomtadze, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Deviloper. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Deviloper|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 12:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance with finance articles[edit]

Hello Deviloper. I responded to your message on my talk page. I regret that it took me so long to do so! I concur with Wikipedia's decision regarding those particular edits. I visited your page and read the message prior to mine (there is so much mark up that I am having trouble discerning the name). I saw some of the edits you had been making in past. They were updates of information about financial companies in Central Asia, and sometimes in the West. They were good edits. They were small incremental improvements to the articles.

It is important that you do not do any editing if it is a conflict of interest (COI). I have worked with COI editors before. There is a procedure for that. I can give you the Wiki name of a nice man with whom I worked on Wikipedia financial edits in such a situation. He is a productive editor and isn't associated with anything scammy. He would probably be willing to guide you through the instructions you received already um from user scope creep. User scope creep's instructions aren't unduly burdensome, as long as you are editing in good faith.

Generally, I am a deletionist and do not personally like paid editing! For financial companies, and for finance ministries of many nations, it can be difficult to get up to date information. When appropriate procedures are followed, COI editors can be very helpful. I also realize that all COI editors are not paid editors. If I can be of assistance to you in the future, please reply on my talk page.--FeralOink (talk) 22:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]