User talk:Deesha.chheda

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Deesha.chheda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Media buying automation, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 11:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Media buying automation[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Media buying automation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 11:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 7 steps to make a perfect media plan.[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 7 steps to make a perfect media plan., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VIVEK RAI : Friend? 12:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 7 steps to make a perfect media plan.[edit]

The article 7 steps to make a perfect media plan. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTESSAY, pure original research, suitable for a blogging platform, but not an article for Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 13:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Media Buying Calculations[edit]

The article Media Buying Calculations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTESSAY, pure original research, suitable for a blogging platform, but not an article for Wikipedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiddle Faddle 13:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Private sector PR[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Private sector PR. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Public relations. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Public relations – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 10:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its difficult to understand your policies, i have tried to publish somethinh very informative and usefull, and im being told its not suitable for wikipedia but for a blog, while i know oof people , students who search for such topics on wikipedia. request you to revist these pages of mine and also publish these.

Wikipedia is not a webhost. Whilst your contributions would not look out of place on a marketing blog, this is not the appropriate venue for them. This is an encyclopedia - it provides information about topics, not instructions. If your students would find your writings useful, by all means publish them on the internet - just not here. There are many other outlets for your work, but Wikipedia does not print original research. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying, will keep in mind henceforth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Disha.c (talk • contribs) 10:54, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment, placed by a different username, suggests that you are operating multiple accounts. Since this is not permitted, I have blocked this account; please use only your original account for editing. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Additional evidence has revealed a number of similar accounts to yours, all submitting similarly inappropriate material. I'm assuming that you are all students on some sort of marketing course, and that your professor has set you the task of editing Wikipedia as part of your grade. Since it doesn't appear that you are the same person using multiple accounts, I have unblocked this account.

However, the problems with your contributions and those of your classmates remain. Please could you therefore place a message below linking to your professor's Wikipedia username (not their email or real name) so that we can contact them and help them sort out the issues. Wikipedia has numerous systems in place to help student editors, but it does not appear that your professor has read up on these or followed Wikipedia's guidelines for such work. It's important that we make contact with him before you and your classmates end up permanently blocked from Wikipedia (which might well entail blocking your entire college network as well). Yunshui 雲‍水 13:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]