User talk:DeadlyAssassin/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

thanks

Resolved

i didnt know about the current tag. --TheGreenGorilla (talk) 10:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Au revoir, les enfants

Resolved

Hey. You don't need to request a redirect page to be deleted in order to move an article over it, unless the target page has a history (two or more edits). Anyway, I have now deleted the page so you can perform the move. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 13:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

• Oh, thanks for letting me know. I didn't realise that. Thanks for your help. --Deadly∀ssassin 13:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Galvorn

My only concern is that edit history should be preserved at the "main" redirect (Galvorn), for editors' convenience. (Could you please also delete Galvorn (Middle-earth) and Galvorn (tolkien)? They do not contain any edit history and are unlikely to be entered by a user, so no policies seem to be violated. Thanks.) Súrendil (talk) 16:33, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

• Ah, I see your reasoning now. I've reverted my own edit so that the move can take place. As for the other redirects, they're not hurting anything so there's probably no reason to go to the effort to delete them. --Deadly∀ssassin 00:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Why?

Why have you flagged my topic on my football club?

It is ridiculous!

GROW UP YOU PEICE OF LARD...

IT IS STUPID HOW YOU ARE SO NAIVE!

Let me put it this way, You're a sad sad man. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rosscmullins (talk • contribs) 11:57, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: 21/2/3 SAS merger propsal

Nice one matey, I was just about to propose that myself due to them being a complete copy of whats on the original SAS article anyway. You beat me to it! Happy editing! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 18:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

lol, my pleasure. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 19:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:DoctorWhoEpisodeHead

Template:DoctorWhoEpisodeHead has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 02:15, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Want to add the production codes? I'll go backwards from the Seventh Doctor, you go forwards from season 2. Shouldn't take too long; it's only 75 each. Sceptre ^(talk) 01:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Dr Who ep table

OK... it's set up for the multiple refs now. And the docs are updated.

I'm going to start running through the articles.

- J Greb (talk) 14:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Just an update: Through "The Invasion" have been cleared. If you want to lend a hand, that or prior should serve as a good indication of how the table template needs to be updated. - J Greb (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Good work. I'll start at Survival and work backwards. See you somewhere around Tom Baker! --Deadly∀ssassin 23:07, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

wetube article

Mikeytatelive (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I created the article since it wasn't on here. But I thought that was enough info on here. But okay! If you like, you can do the article instead of me doing it. You can use some of my text and add yours to it. How's that?

• I'm not sure what you mean. At the moment it's a thing they're working on, but we don't know any more. In my opinion having a separate article that says that is a bit pointless. The article is there and just redirected so when new information is released all that has to happen is to edit it in. --Deadly∀ssassin 00:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Mikeytatelive (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

When I was creating the article, this site was saying that the actual article was recently on here and got deleted so I thought I'd try doing that myself. But then as I keep checking on it frequently, it's been staying there so far. And minutes later, I saw that you made the article redirect to youtube.

• I had redirected it, because I saw that there was very little concrete information. Someone else requested it be deleted because they thought it was a hoax which was declined and then I redirected it again. If there's more information than it's an upcoming service from YouTube which allows us to host videos then I've no problem with it. As it stood I felt that it would be better handled in the main YouTube article until more information was available. I have also added weTube information to the YouTube article. --Deadly∀ssassin 22:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Mikeytatelive (talk) 16:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay! Sounds good then! Thank you!

Image copyright problem with Image:Secretarmy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Secretarmy.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Charles2304

You've had some discussions with Charles2304 (talk · contribs) who's been trying to advertise himself – the latest effort at Charles McDonald (Scottish Entrepreneur and Model) had a whole lot of apparently unrelated external links, and one news item which seemed to give some backing to his existence. Not enough to establish notability, so I've stripped the article down to basics and tagged it for issues. Rather tedious, think it's still appropriate for a speedy deletion? . . dave souza, talk 20:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Dave, thanks for letting me know. There are claims of notability, although I think they are tenuous and no reliable 3rd party sources. Both Charles McDonald and Episode Management fail the google test. I have removed the links on the episode management page because most of them are dead ends or links to unrelated sites with no information. As a result I don't think it qualifies for CSD, but I am going to take it to AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles McDonald (Scottish Entrepreneur and Model). Cheers. --Deadly∀ssassin 21:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

• ETA: It looks like Episode Management has been deleted again. If he recreates I will add it to the AFD nomination. --Deadly∀ssassin 21:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

It's now been deleted for the third time, and this time locked so he can't create it again witout admin assistance. Not a reliable editor, thanks for your work on this. . dave souza, talk 22:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I hadn't noticed that. Thanks. Let's hope we can move on to other things soon! --Deadly∀ssassin 23:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Tarun Tejpal

Please see talk page .-Bharatveer (talk) 11:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Kayzoo

This is about the Kayzoo Speedy deletion, I see it was deleted. I just wanted to say that one of the very first things I wrote to you about the hold on the speedy deletion was. I was not finished writing about it. I would think when someone said they were not finished writing about a subject you would give them a few days to finish. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gehaner (talk • contribs) 18:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

• I marked the article because I had concertns, it's up an administrator to delete the article. In this case User:Ameliorate! made the final decision. If you've got questions about the timetable for deletion rather than the reasons I tagged it for deletion, can I suggest that you contact him? --Deadly∀ssassin 21:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:NOTABILITY of Stagevu

I personally added the article because I felt that the site was notable enough to warrant an article on Wiki along with the many other videos-sharing sites already on here. I think that the article (now) has enough content on it to justify notability, similar to the likes of other similar websites such as StageHD (which has no references whatsoever) and VReel (which isn't even public yet!).

You can take a look at the article now at Stagevu. If you have any further objections or suggestions about the article, please tell me. Otherwise, would it be okay to remove the notability template? - Phsource (talk) 04:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

• Hi Phsource, I believe that the tag should stay for now because none of the sources that are from reliable sources. In fact I'm going to delete one or two of them - those to forums for example. The notability policy requires articles in newspapers, magazines, etc or recognised awards. Thanks for pointing out those other articles, I've added the notability tag to those too. --Deadly∀ssassin 16:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Well thank you for the barn star. Makes it all worth while. When you look at other folks' talk pages you see welcome banners when they first arrive.....I never got one of them.....you also see plaudits for passing 5,000 edits.....I cruised through 5,000 and received nothing....not that I was looking for it, actually I had hit 5,500 before I even noticed myself. The occasional barnstar is nice though. 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 21:01, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

• Well, congratulations on hitting your 5000+ edits. Wikipedia can be pretty unfriendly, and to be honest it's often the people who have made mistakes that get welcome tagged. It's a bit backwards but there you go. I was just surfing around and came across another of your articles and realised all of the work that you put into them, and I remembered that you did wonders with the King Edward VI Humanities College article way back when. Anyway - I'm happy that you appreciated the barnstar, it's definitely well deserved. :D --Deadly∀ssassin 04:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Rando-Comment

Wikipedia is the worst info site on earth why are you even in this???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cjknow (talk • contribs) 15:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

You....

You are awesome.

That is all, good day sir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sotamias (talk • contribs) 06:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

User talk:DeadlyAssassin/March Violets

Why did you request a G6 deletion on this page? If you wanted to move the entire history to the article space, you'd have to ask for a G6 of the articlespace entry for a history merge. Although, I don't see why the history needs to be merged, no one else edited it while it was in your userspace. (Did you perhaps mean to ask for deletion of a userpage no one else edited?) - Mgm|^(talk) 10:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

• Why does it matter? I didn't see the need to keep the history of the page in my user space, so just copied the contents over to the article namespace and asked for deletion of the user page. --Deadly∀ssassin 08:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)