User talk:CycloneYoris/Archive 49
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 |
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2023)
Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: East Sussex • Sports science Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Colpo grosso a Berlino unsourced (?)
@CycloneYoris I understand what you mean, but is the link to the film at the end not a source? I think it is actually more reliable than other types of sources, such as reviews of the film. Kind regards 14 novembre (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
- @14 novembre: Yes, but it counts as a primary source. I'll go ahead and change the template to indicate that sources are already present and that only additional sources are needed. CycloneYoris talk! 18:58, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2023)
 Online encyclopedias, also called Internet encyclopedias, are digital encyclopedias accessible through the Internet.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: International trade law • East Sussex Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Had to decline this because it isn't substantially identical, and I think current practice at DRV is overturn ones similar to these when they reach review stage. Definitely a possible candidate for AfD so just flicking you a note as a heads-up. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 00:51, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- No problem. I guess we'll have to wait and see if someone else nominates it at AfD. Thanks for the heads-up. CycloneYoris talk! 01:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2023
- Special report: Did the Chinese Communist Party send astroturfers to sabotage a hacktivist's Wikipedia article?
- News and notes: The Italian Public Domain wars continue, Wikimedia RU set to dissolve, and a recap of WLM 2023
- In the media: Consider the humble fork
- Discussion report: Arabic Wikipedia blackout; Wikimedians discuss SpongeBob, copyrights, and AI
- In focus: Liquidation of Wikimedia RU
- Technology report: Dark mode is coming
- Recent research: "LLMs Know More, Hallucinate Less" with Wikidata
- Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols
- Comix: Lollus lmaois 200C tincture
- Crossword: when the crossword is sus
- Traffic report: What's the big deal? I'm an animal!
- From the editor: A piccy iz worth OVAR 9000!!!11oneone! wordz ^_^
- Humour: Guess the joke contest
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2023)
 Cycle between autotrophs and heterotrophs: autotrophs use light, carbon dioxide, and water to form oxygen and organic compounds, mainly through the process of photosynthesis (green arrow).
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Online encyclopedia • International trade law Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| Congratulations on being among the top three most active pending changes reviewers during the last 30 days. Fantastic job! – DreamRimmer (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC) |
Occupational Health Science (journal)
@CycloneYoris, regarding Occupational Health Science (journal) I followed the previous debate about the notability and worthiness of the article and profited from that debate. Here is some of what I did. (1) I used many sources that are external to the journal. (2) I sourced the databases where the journal is indexed. (3) I obtained the impact factor, which is higher than the impact of other journals in WP. Tell me what more you want. Perhaps I can add to the entry to make more notable. Iss246 (talk) 04:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Iss246: Seems fine to me. I'll go ahead and remove the CSD tag on your behalf, and since it appears that the current version is a lot different to the one that was deleted. CycloneYoris talk! 04:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Would you @CycloneYoris be able to weigh in on the debate around the newly revised Occupational Health Science (journal)? User:Randykitty reposted the An-editor-has-nominated-this-article-for-deletion banner on top of the article and started a discussion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupational_Health_Science_(journal)_(2nd_nomination) . Thank you.Iss246 (talk) 02:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Iss246: Sorry, but sadly I cannot do anything about it. The editor has found reasons for nominating the article at AfD, and we better respect their decision and let the AfD run its course. Also, participating at your request would be a violation of WP:CANVASSING, so it's best if I stay out of it. My apologies. CycloneYoris talk! 03:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2024)
Hello, CycloneYoris. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Carbon source (biology) • Online encyclopedia Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Steve Young
Hi CycloneYoris. That IP user seemed to be correct regarding Steve Young being third in rushing touchdowns. Unfortunately, the 2023 season has one more week before an update could be done. Looks like Young's page is through 2020. Josh Allen passed him and Jalen Hurts will pass him soon. I only bring this up in case the IP user comes back at you. You know the way people are. But like you said, it was unexplained. I'll try to look into those stats when the season ends. Here is what I found so far. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_dual-threat_quarterback_records Thanks for your time and all that you do. Bringingthewood (talk) 06:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Bringingthewood and thanks for the heads-up! I reverted the IP because their edits seemed suspicious, but now I know that they meant no harm. I'll definitely be on the lookout though in case they come around. CycloneYoris talk! 07:07, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Yep, I thought that was your reason and I agree with you 100%. Honestly, I looked up these stats to make sure that IP wouldn't contaminate other pages. Good news is that they meant well, bad news is that Young's stats are a mess to change. Passer rating goes up and down every year and he dropped to 14th already. Oh well. At least we got to meet. Enjoy the New Year! Bringingthewood (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Bringingthewood: Wow, didn't know those stats were such a mess! Let me know anytime if you need any help with that, and thanks again for stopping by. Have an awesome New Year! :) CycloneYoris talk! 07:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Will do. I tried to make this a lot easier for all. I made it 'currently' for the passer rating part, being that it wasn't changed since 2020 and now it won't have to be updated on a yearly basis. If an editor pays attention, before they scream 'what is current', they can click on the reference provided, (PFR) does all the work. I'll leave you alone now, lol. You're welcome and thank you very much! Regards Bringingthewood (talk) 07:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Bringingthewood: Yeah, I noticed, and it does seem a lot better than how it was before. It sucks when something has to be updated manually, but you definitely made it easier for everyone. Thank you so much for that! Kind regards. CycloneYoris talk! 08:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- You got it! :) Happy 2024! Bringingthewood (talk) 08:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Bringingthewood: Yeah, I noticed, and it does seem a lot better than how it was before. It sucks when something has to be updated manually, but you definitely made it easier for everyone. Thank you so much for that! Kind regards. CycloneYoris talk! 08:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Will do. I tried to make this a lot easier for all. I made it 'currently' for the passer rating part, being that it wasn't changed since 2020 and now it won't have to be updated on a yearly basis. If an editor pays attention, before they scream 'what is current', they can click on the reference provided, (PFR) does all the work. I'll leave you alone now, lol. You're welcome and thank you very much! Regards Bringingthewood (talk) 07:44, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Bringingthewood: Wow, didn't know those stats were such a mess! Let me know anytime if you need any help with that, and thanks again for stopping by. Have an awesome New Year! :) CycloneYoris talk! 07:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- You're very welcome. Yep, I thought that was your reason and I agree with you 100%. Honestly, I looked up these stats to make sure that IP wouldn't contaminate other pages. Good news is that they meant well, bad news is that Young's stats are a mess to change. Passer rating goes up and down every year and he dropped to 14th already. Oh well. At least we got to meet. Enjoy the New Year! Bringingthewood (talk) 07:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of The Nun (2018 video game)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on The Nun (2018 video game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Seawolf35 T--C 09:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh no! I hit the tag button at just the right time. Trout me at your will. Seawolf35 T--C 09:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Seawolf35: no worries lol. I should've waited a while before moving the page to draft. Thanks for striking the warning btw. CycloneYoris talk! 09:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi CycloneYoris -- I've declined this A7, as I think a national tour is sufficiently likely to have attracted press attention that time should be given to allow reliable sourcing to be added, which in this case will require a search by someone familiar with Norwegian. I agree it appears borderline given that the non-Norwegian concerts were all cancelled. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Espresso Addict. No problem. I guess we'll have to wait and see how the article evolves, but I do agree the tour seems quite notable. Thank you for notifying me of your decision. Cheers, CycloneYoris talk! 03:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2024)
 An antacid is a substance which neutralizes stomach acidity and is used to relieve heartburn, indigestion or an upset stomach.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Fish slice • Carbon source (biology) Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 January 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
NPP Awards for 2023
|
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
| For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC) |
- @Dr vulpes: Thank you! Glad I've been able to help out. :) CycloneYoris talk! 03:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)