User talk:Crsvncnt
Original data that consists of? I had just read on your website that science doesnt know where emotions come from. And i waS stateing they come from our fight of humanity in good and evil in good and evil Then why hasnt it been confirmed yet... if that wasnt a topic tbat hasnt been confirmed where are they on it where are on it. You pick up the good feelings or you pick up the bad both have a central power that can give a person a drive. That drive in the end leads you to hell or heaven And i was stating science calls this matter anti matter i call it devine and evil come in us threw our contousness and create emotion. And that sience is led back to being spanked and taght by devine thn i was kicked off because of it. Outside of flesh they dont see each other fragments ignite in us in the figbt for a soul. Iknow this cause my souls actualy burned a verry saveer emotion that opended up the knolege of good and evil to me. What els could it be
The relation between god and evil to matter and anti matter[edit]
Now let's say that matter and anti matter don't realy come in contact with themselves. Let's say that this can't happen because they can't see each other. Lets sag one creates and the other desieves Let's say that we as being the children of god humans wich are exceptible to evil we can feel them both. That the emotions they can't exsplain how we feel how that charge directed where do we get that charge. Where do we get the feelings from What if it was to tell you . And please correct me if I'm wrong here anti matter and matter coming in through our countousness the way we persieve things and creating these emotions..ignititing through our countousness. one wanting a greater contousness the other not so great ...would you say i was wrong. I dont think you would. How would I know that? That you guys have all those micro scopes and I'm really some guy. Relations my friends I have a realy strong countousness and my souls been on fire before. No joke. So emotions definition the relation to science and to the spiritual world I give you this. Matter and anti matter through our countousness are met in our quest to gain a higher countousness evil does not want us to have where we live in heaven where I call creation a spark not a charge. Wisdom Crsvncnt (talk) 11:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
So threw the countousness of us and our eisdom of good and evil and sciences on matter and anti matter knowing there one and the same so we picking fragmeants of the teo in our contousness creating emotions we are the key to science refound faith. God's great leed you guys to look back to yourselves finding him all over again
That's beautifull Crsvncnt (talk) 16:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Crsvncnt[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Crsvncnt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jusdafax (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC. So my book 25000 words you guys won't recognize this
EExcuseme this us a talk page. So talk about it or delete it I do have a book about it )
Yes i dont see how you would do that. You call yourselves what? Scientist knowledge seekers. What kind of site are you then. My philosophy will go down in history I do have allot to say on the matter. And for you to kick me off puts you way behind. And go ahead look for my book. And that wasnt nothing. You guys are to busy trying put damb deffinitions on everything you stay right where I can find you Ill go make a site by damb Your world was based on theory and philosophy and now your scared if it. How many times are going to read the answers. Crsvncnt (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]
|
That there's nothing els it could be...... that's not good enough I mean if it walks and quacks like a duck its a duck. Thank you for the invitation kid have a good night. God bless