User talk:CorrTimes

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, CorrTimes! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Alas, there is no nicer way to say this, but it seems like you are following me around. You've made a total of 42 edits to Wikipedia and of the most recent 7, 5 are disagreeing with me in three different places.

You've shown up at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rosemarie_Bryan, then accused me of having a conflict of interest (without first discusisng with me) here, and now you're repeating that allegation, despite my rejection of it, at Talk:Olusola Adeogun.

I think that:

Taking me to a notice board without first discussing the matter with me is not right.
Not notifying me that you did so is also not right.
Showing up in three different places feels like WP:HOUNDING

I am finding this distressing. If you are following me around Wikipedia, please stop. CT55555 (talk) 03:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm not mistaken, Wikipedia relies upon a kind of peer review system to ensure its accuracy. I found patterns in your work which struck me as problematic, so I posted on the conflict of interest page, You denied a conflict of interest. Okay..

What bothers me most is the use of references which look superficially impressive but upon examination do not actually say what they are supposed to support, as well as biased writing for Canadaland podcasters and against people they don’t like, i.e. Rosemarie Bryan. But those problems can be discussed on the relevant talk pages as warranted..CorrTimes (talk) 06:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olusola_Adeogun for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olusola_Adeogun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olusola_Adeogun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hard thoughtful work (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]